Comparison of Bishop score and cervical length measurement through transvaginal ultrasound as prediction against labor induction

Objective: To compare the Bishop score and cervical length measured by transvaginal ultrasound concerned with prediction over the success of labor induction. Methods: This cross-sectional observational analytical study was conducted from May 2017 to October 2017 at several teaching hospitals of Obst...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Finianty Raynelda, Efendi Lukas, Sriwijaya Qadar, Maisuri T Chalid
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2018-01-01
Series:Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.apjr.net/article.asp?issn=2305-0500;year=2018;volume=7;issue=6;spage=280;epage=284;aulast=Raynelda
_version_ 1828823194379747328
author Finianty Raynelda
Efendi Lukas
Sriwijaya Qadar
Maisuri T Chalid
author_facet Finianty Raynelda
Efendi Lukas
Sriwijaya Qadar
Maisuri T Chalid
author_sort Finianty Raynelda
collection DOAJ
description Objective: To compare the Bishop score and cervical length measured by transvaginal ultrasound concerned with prediction over the success of labor induction. Methods: This cross-sectional observational analytical study was conducted from May 2017 to October 2017 at several teaching hospitals of Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Faculty of Medicine Hasanuddin University of Makassar, India. There were 110 samples of pregnant women undergoing labor induction process including 79 samples of successful induction and 31 samples of induction failure. The data analysis used Pearson Chi-square test and multivariate logistic regression to see the effect of Bishop score and measurement of cervical length with successful induction of labor. Results: Number of samples with successful labor induction with Bishop score ⩾3 was 25 (31.6%) and Bishop score was 54 (68.4%), with rate ratio=3.714 and P=0.000. With measurement of cervical length (cut-off point 2.98 cm), number of samples with successful labor induction with cervical length ⩽2.98 cm was 12 (15.2%) and cervical length >2.98 cm was 67 (84.8%), with rate ratio=3.124 and P=0.000. Multivahate analysis of logistic regression was found to be more influential in the predicted success of labor induction (P=0.014 with Bishop score <3, odds ratio=1.000 and Bishop score ⩾3, odds ratio=3.779. Conclusions: Bishop score is better in predicting the success of labor induction compared to the measurement of cervical length through transvaginal ultrasound.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T13:30:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0c7d46308aee49e794f68fb0fb521237
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2305-0500
2305-0519
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T13:30:20Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction
spelling doaj.art-0c7d46308aee49e794f68fb0fb5212372022-12-22T00:23:05ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsAsian Pacific Journal of Reproduction2305-05002305-05192018-01-017628028410.4103/2305-0500.246348Comparison of Bishop score and cervical length measurement through transvaginal ultrasound as prediction against labor inductionFinianty RayneldaEfendi LukasSriwijaya QadarMaisuri T ChalidObjective: To compare the Bishop score and cervical length measured by transvaginal ultrasound concerned with prediction over the success of labor induction. Methods: This cross-sectional observational analytical study was conducted from May 2017 to October 2017 at several teaching hospitals of Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Faculty of Medicine Hasanuddin University of Makassar, India. There were 110 samples of pregnant women undergoing labor induction process including 79 samples of successful induction and 31 samples of induction failure. The data analysis used Pearson Chi-square test and multivariate logistic regression to see the effect of Bishop score and measurement of cervical length with successful induction of labor. Results: Number of samples with successful labor induction with Bishop score ⩾3 was 25 (31.6%) and Bishop score was 54 (68.4%), with rate ratio=3.714 and P=0.000. With measurement of cervical length (cut-off point 2.98 cm), number of samples with successful labor induction with cervical length ⩽2.98 cm was 12 (15.2%) and cervical length >2.98 cm was 67 (84.8%), with rate ratio=3.124 and P=0.000. Multivahate analysis of logistic regression was found to be more influential in the predicted success of labor induction (P=0.014 with Bishop score <3, odds ratio=1.000 and Bishop score ⩾3, odds ratio=3.779. Conclusions: Bishop score is better in predicting the success of labor induction compared to the measurement of cervical length through transvaginal ultrasound.http://www.apjr.net/article.asp?issn=2305-0500;year=2018;volume=7;issue=6;spage=280;epage=284;aulast=RayneldaBishop scoreCervical lengthLabor inductionTransvaginal ultrasound
spellingShingle Finianty Raynelda
Efendi Lukas
Sriwijaya Qadar
Maisuri T Chalid
Comparison of Bishop score and cervical length measurement through transvaginal ultrasound as prediction against labor induction
Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction
Bishop score
Cervical length
Labor induction
Transvaginal ultrasound
title Comparison of Bishop score and cervical length measurement through transvaginal ultrasound as prediction against labor induction
title_full Comparison of Bishop score and cervical length measurement through transvaginal ultrasound as prediction against labor induction
title_fullStr Comparison of Bishop score and cervical length measurement through transvaginal ultrasound as prediction against labor induction
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Bishop score and cervical length measurement through transvaginal ultrasound as prediction against labor induction
title_short Comparison of Bishop score and cervical length measurement through transvaginal ultrasound as prediction against labor induction
title_sort comparison of bishop score and cervical length measurement through transvaginal ultrasound as prediction against labor induction
topic Bishop score
Cervical length
Labor induction
Transvaginal ultrasound
url http://www.apjr.net/article.asp?issn=2305-0500;year=2018;volume=7;issue=6;spage=280;epage=284;aulast=Raynelda
work_keys_str_mv AT finiantyraynelda comparisonofbishopscoreandcervicallengthmeasurementthroughtransvaginalultrasoundaspredictionagainstlaborinduction
AT efendilukas comparisonofbishopscoreandcervicallengthmeasurementthroughtransvaginalultrasoundaspredictionagainstlaborinduction
AT sriwijayaqadar comparisonofbishopscoreandcervicallengthmeasurementthroughtransvaginalultrasoundaspredictionagainstlaborinduction
AT maisuritchalid comparisonofbishopscoreandcervicallengthmeasurementthroughtransvaginalultrasoundaspredictionagainstlaborinduction