Greenland and Denmark: Arctic Secessionism in a Global Powerplay

Greenland, the biggest island in the world inhabited predominantly by Inuits, was a Danish colony before 1953 and has since then been a part of the Danish realm with a gradually increasing autonomy. Some 2/3 of its population favor a complete secession, but the heavy dependence upon Danish budget su...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: A. A. Krivorotov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ассоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”) 2021-01-01
Series:Контуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ogt-journal.com/jour/article/view/721
_version_ 1797646963238240256
author A. A. Krivorotov
author_facet A. A. Krivorotov
author_sort A. A. Krivorotov
collection DOAJ
description Greenland, the biggest island in the world inhabited predominantly by Inuits, was a Danish colony before 1953 and has since then been a part of the Danish realm with a gradually increasing autonomy. Some 2/3 of its population favor a complete secession, but the heavy dependence upon Danish budget subsidies is the main challenge. The Chinese government and companies have since 2005 maintained a close dialogue with Greenland as an entry point to the Arctic and a rich base of natural resources (including rare earth elements), though there has not been major investments yet. The U.S. have lately tried to halt this cooperation for the reasons of foreign, security and resource policy, and to put Greenland under a tighter American control. President Trump’s purchase offer in 2019 was the most publicized initiative. Denmark, despite its close alliance with the United States, is worried by either American or Chinese involvement and tries to become a good patron for Greenland to prevent its secession. Meanwhile, the Greenlandic authorities confirm their political will to struggle for a complete independence from Denmark. The article suggests three medium-term scenarios, with Greenland remaining in an gradually looser union with Denmark, moving into the U.S. domain and acquiring a full statehood with a subsequent competition of great powers. Whatever the outcome, Russia shall monitor the development closely and play an active role in the Arctic, not taking a part in the US-China rivalry.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T15:10:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0c7dc437bf134b558ef1258301ef8fcb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2542-0240
2587-9324
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T15:10:26Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Ассоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”)
record_format Article
series Контуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право
spelling doaj.art-0c7dc437bf134b558ef1258301ef8fcb2023-10-29T15:55:28ZengАссоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”)Контуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право2542-02402587-93242021-01-0114111813410.23932/2542-0240-2021-14-1-6532Greenland and Denmark: Arctic Secessionism in a Global PowerplayA. A. Krivorotov0Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO University), Odintsovo branchGreenland, the biggest island in the world inhabited predominantly by Inuits, was a Danish colony before 1953 and has since then been a part of the Danish realm with a gradually increasing autonomy. Some 2/3 of its population favor a complete secession, but the heavy dependence upon Danish budget subsidies is the main challenge. The Chinese government and companies have since 2005 maintained a close dialogue with Greenland as an entry point to the Arctic and a rich base of natural resources (including rare earth elements), though there has not been major investments yet. The U.S. have lately tried to halt this cooperation for the reasons of foreign, security and resource policy, and to put Greenland under a tighter American control. President Trump’s purchase offer in 2019 was the most publicized initiative. Denmark, despite its close alliance with the United States, is worried by either American or Chinese involvement and tries to become a good patron for Greenland to prevent its secession. Meanwhile, the Greenlandic authorities confirm their political will to struggle for a complete independence from Denmark. The article suggests three medium-term scenarios, with Greenland remaining in an gradually looser union with Denmark, moving into the U.S. domain and acquiring a full statehood with a subsequent competition of great powers. Whatever the outcome, Russia shall monitor the development closely and play an active role in the Arctic, not taking a part in the US-China rivalry.https://www.ogt-journal.com/jour/article/view/721greenlandself-rulesecessionismdenmarkchina-us confrontationarcticrare earth elementsscenariosrussia
spellingShingle A. A. Krivorotov
Greenland and Denmark: Arctic Secessionism in a Global Powerplay
Контуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право
greenland
self-rule
secessionism
denmark
china-us confrontation
arctic
rare earth elements
scenarios
russia
title Greenland and Denmark: Arctic Secessionism in a Global Powerplay
title_full Greenland and Denmark: Arctic Secessionism in a Global Powerplay
title_fullStr Greenland and Denmark: Arctic Secessionism in a Global Powerplay
title_full_unstemmed Greenland and Denmark: Arctic Secessionism in a Global Powerplay
title_short Greenland and Denmark: Arctic Secessionism in a Global Powerplay
title_sort greenland and denmark arctic secessionism in a global powerplay
topic greenland
self-rule
secessionism
denmark
china-us confrontation
arctic
rare earth elements
scenarios
russia
url https://www.ogt-journal.com/jour/article/view/721
work_keys_str_mv AT aakrivorotov greenlandanddenmarkarcticsecessionisminaglobalpowerplay