New Narrative Depths?

The article aims to tease out an implicit, possibly even instinctive, assumption about why big-budget blockbuster storylines come up short compared to other kinds of culturally sanctioned narratives. Briefly, the assumption is that there is a distinct difference between stories that are simply a pre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lavik Erlend
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2009-11-01
Series:Nordicom Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2017-0156
_version_ 1797712515299278848
author Lavik Erlend
author_facet Lavik Erlend
author_sort Lavik Erlend
collection DOAJ
description The article aims to tease out an implicit, possibly even instinctive, assumption about why big-budget blockbuster storylines come up short compared to other kinds of culturally sanctioned narratives. Briefly, the assumption is that there is a distinct difference between stories that are simply a pretext for a series of isolated attractions and stories that are guided by some greater predefined purpose or guiding idea. If we look more closely at it, this presumption throws up some surprising and paradoxical findings. My hypothesis is that this line of reasoning has tended to seep into the debate about classical and postclassical Hollywood cinema. The article argues that we should not take this assumption for granted, and that it has confused the debate about historical changes in Hollywood films. However, by restating the opposition between blockbuster narratives and more prestigious story-types in different terms, we can study blockbuster cinema from a more productive perspective than has been the case so far.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T07:22:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0c93ac48456f4c308715209d3fd9c0bd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2001-5119
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T07:22:54Z
publishDate 2009-11-01
publisher Sciendo
record_format Article
series Nordicom Review
spelling doaj.art-0c93ac48456f4c308715209d3fd9c0bd2023-09-02T22:16:44ZengSciendoNordicom Review2001-51192009-11-0130214115710.1515/nor-2017-0156New Narrative Depths?Lavik Erlend0Ph.D., Associate Professor, Department of Information Science and Media Studies, University of Bergen, NorwayThe article aims to tease out an implicit, possibly even instinctive, assumption about why big-budget blockbuster storylines come up short compared to other kinds of culturally sanctioned narratives. Briefly, the assumption is that there is a distinct difference between stories that are simply a pretext for a series of isolated attractions and stories that are guided by some greater predefined purpose or guiding idea. If we look more closely at it, this presumption throws up some surprising and paradoxical findings. My hypothesis is that this line of reasoning has tended to seep into the debate about classical and postclassical Hollywood cinema. The article argues that we should not take this assumption for granted, and that it has confused the debate about historical changes in Hollywood films. However, by restating the opposition between blockbuster narratives and more prestigious story-types in different terms, we can study blockbuster cinema from a more productive perspective than has been the case so far.https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2017-0156narrativeblockbuster cinemaspectaclefilm historypostclassicismhollywood
spellingShingle Lavik Erlend
New Narrative Depths?
Nordicom Review
narrative
blockbuster cinema
spectacle
film history
postclassicism
hollywood
title New Narrative Depths?
title_full New Narrative Depths?
title_fullStr New Narrative Depths?
title_full_unstemmed New Narrative Depths?
title_short New Narrative Depths?
title_sort new narrative depths
topic narrative
blockbuster cinema
spectacle
film history
postclassicism
hollywood
url https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2017-0156
work_keys_str_mv AT lavikerlend newnarrativedepths