Positioning Evaluation of Single and Dual-Frequency Low-Cost GNSS Receivers Signals Using PPP and Static Relative Methods in Urban Areas

A positional accuracy obtained by the Precise Point Positioning and static relative methods was compared and analyzed. Test data was collected using low-cost GNSS receivers of single- and dual-frequency in urban areas. The data was analyzed for quality using the TEQC program to determine the degree...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rosendo Romero-Andrade, Manuel E. Trejo-Soto, Alejandro Vega-Ayala, Daniel Hernández-Andrade, Jesús R. Vázquez-Ontiveros, Gopal Sharma
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-11-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/22/10642
_version_ 1797511331337732096
author Rosendo Romero-Andrade
Manuel E. Trejo-Soto
Alejandro Vega-Ayala
Daniel Hernández-Andrade
Jesús R. Vázquez-Ontiveros
Gopal Sharma
author_facet Rosendo Romero-Andrade
Manuel E. Trejo-Soto
Alejandro Vega-Ayala
Daniel Hernández-Andrade
Jesús R. Vázquez-Ontiveros
Gopal Sharma
author_sort Rosendo Romero-Andrade
collection DOAJ
description A positional accuracy obtained by the Precise Point Positioning and static relative methods was compared and analyzed. Test data was collected using low-cost GNSS receivers of single- and dual-frequency in urban areas. The data was analyzed for quality using the TEQC program to determine the degree of affectation of the signal in the urban area. Low-cost GNSS receivers were found to be sensitive to the multipath effect, which impacts positioning. The horizontal and vertical accuracy was evaluated with respect to Mexican regulations for the GNSS establishment criteria. Probable Error Circle (CEP) and Vertical Positioning Accuracy (EPV) were performed on low cost GNSS receiver observation data. The results show that low-cost dual-frequency GNSS receivers can be used in urban areas. The precision was obtained in the order of 0.013 m in the static relative method. The results obtained are comparable to a geodetic receiver in a geodetic baseline of <20 km. The study does not recommend using single and dual frequencies low cost GNSS receivers based on results obtained by the Precise Point Positioning (PPP) method in urban areas. The inclusion of the GGM10 model reduces the vertical precision obtained by using low cost GNSS receivers in both methods, conforming to the regulations only in the horizontal component.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T05:43:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0c993d2c3e164bc998072bab443522ae
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3417
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T05:43:49Z
publishDate 2021-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Applied Sciences
spelling doaj.art-0c993d2c3e164bc998072bab443522ae2023-11-22T22:16:42ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172021-11-0111221064210.3390/app112210642Positioning Evaluation of Single and Dual-Frequency Low-Cost GNSS Receivers Signals Using PPP and Static Relative Methods in Urban AreasRosendo Romero-Andrade0Manuel E. Trejo-Soto1Alejandro Vega-Ayala2Daniel Hernández-Andrade3Jesús R. Vázquez-Ontiveros4Gopal Sharma5 Faculty of Earth and Space Sciences, Autonomous University of Sinaloa, Culiacán 80040, Mexico Faculty of Earth and Space Sciences, Autonomous University of Sinaloa, Culiacán 80040, Mexico Faculty of Earth and Space Sciences, Autonomous University of Sinaloa, Culiacán 80040, Mexico Faculty of Earth and Space Sciences, Autonomous University of Sinaloa, Culiacán 80040, Mexico Faculty of Earth and Space Sciences, Autonomous University of Sinaloa, Culiacán 80040, Mexico North Eastern Space Applications Centre, Umiam 793103, IndiaA positional accuracy obtained by the Precise Point Positioning and static relative methods was compared and analyzed. Test data was collected using low-cost GNSS receivers of single- and dual-frequency in urban areas. The data was analyzed for quality using the TEQC program to determine the degree of affectation of the signal in the urban area. Low-cost GNSS receivers were found to be sensitive to the multipath effect, which impacts positioning. The horizontal and vertical accuracy was evaluated with respect to Mexican regulations for the GNSS establishment criteria. Probable Error Circle (CEP) and Vertical Positioning Accuracy (EPV) were performed on low cost GNSS receiver observation data. The results show that low-cost dual-frequency GNSS receivers can be used in urban areas. The precision was obtained in the order of 0.013 m in the static relative method. The results obtained are comparable to a geodetic receiver in a geodetic baseline of <20 km. The study does not recommend using single and dual frequencies low cost GNSS receivers based on results obtained by the Precise Point Positioning (PPP) method in urban areas. The inclusion of the GGM10 model reduces the vertical precision obtained by using low cost GNSS receivers in both methods, conforming to the regulations only in the horizontal component.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/22/10642Precise Point Positioningstatic relativeurban areasGNSSlow-cost receivers
spellingShingle Rosendo Romero-Andrade
Manuel E. Trejo-Soto
Alejandro Vega-Ayala
Daniel Hernández-Andrade
Jesús R. Vázquez-Ontiveros
Gopal Sharma
Positioning Evaluation of Single and Dual-Frequency Low-Cost GNSS Receivers Signals Using PPP and Static Relative Methods in Urban Areas
Applied Sciences
Precise Point Positioning
static relative
urban areas
GNSS
low-cost receivers
title Positioning Evaluation of Single and Dual-Frequency Low-Cost GNSS Receivers Signals Using PPP and Static Relative Methods in Urban Areas
title_full Positioning Evaluation of Single and Dual-Frequency Low-Cost GNSS Receivers Signals Using PPP and Static Relative Methods in Urban Areas
title_fullStr Positioning Evaluation of Single and Dual-Frequency Low-Cost GNSS Receivers Signals Using PPP and Static Relative Methods in Urban Areas
title_full_unstemmed Positioning Evaluation of Single and Dual-Frequency Low-Cost GNSS Receivers Signals Using PPP and Static Relative Methods in Urban Areas
title_short Positioning Evaluation of Single and Dual-Frequency Low-Cost GNSS Receivers Signals Using PPP and Static Relative Methods in Urban Areas
title_sort positioning evaluation of single and dual frequency low cost gnss receivers signals using ppp and static relative methods in urban areas
topic Precise Point Positioning
static relative
urban areas
GNSS
low-cost receivers
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/22/10642
work_keys_str_mv AT rosendoromeroandrade positioningevaluationofsingleanddualfrequencylowcostgnssreceiverssignalsusingpppandstaticrelativemethodsinurbanareas
AT manueletrejosoto positioningevaluationofsingleanddualfrequencylowcostgnssreceiverssignalsusingpppandstaticrelativemethodsinurbanareas
AT alejandrovegaayala positioningevaluationofsingleanddualfrequencylowcostgnssreceiverssignalsusingpppandstaticrelativemethodsinurbanareas
AT danielhernandezandrade positioningevaluationofsingleanddualfrequencylowcostgnssreceiverssignalsusingpppandstaticrelativemethodsinurbanareas
AT jesusrvazquezontiveros positioningevaluationofsingleanddualfrequencylowcostgnssreceiverssignalsusingpppandstaticrelativemethodsinurbanareas
AT gopalsharma positioningevaluationofsingleanddualfrequencylowcostgnssreceiverssignalsusingpppandstaticrelativemethodsinurbanareas