Comparison of different quantification methods for 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography studies in rat brains

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate several methods to estimate glucose consumption in the male Wister rat brain as measured by PET. METHODS: Fourteen male Wistar normoglycemic rats were studied. The input function consisted of seventeen blood samples drawn manually from the femoral artery. Gl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Silvana Prando, Camila de Godoi Carneiro, Cecil Chow Robilotta, Marcelo Tatit Sapienza
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier España
Series:Clinics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322019000100277&lng=en&tlng=en
_version_ 1818522270161698816
author Silvana Prando
Camila de Godoi Carneiro
Cecil Chow Robilotta
Marcelo Tatit Sapienza
author_facet Silvana Prando
Camila de Godoi Carneiro
Cecil Chow Robilotta
Marcelo Tatit Sapienza
author_sort Silvana Prando
collection DOAJ
description OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate several methods to estimate glucose consumption in the male Wister rat brain as measured by PET. METHODS: Fourteen male Wistar normoglycemic rats were studied. The input function consisted of seventeen blood samples drawn manually from the femoral artery. Glucose uptake values were calculated using the input function resulting from the arterial blood samples and the tissue time-activity curve derived from the PET images. The estimated glucose consumption rate (Ki) based on the 2-tissue compartment model (2TCM) served as the standard for comparisons with the values calculated by the Patlak analysis and with the fractional uptake rate (FUR), standardized uptake value (SUV) and glucose corrected SUV (SUVglu). RESULTS: No significant difference between the standard Ki and the Patlak Ki was observed. The standard Ki was also found to have strong correlations and concordance with the Ki value estimated by the Patlak analysis. The FUR method presented an excellent correlation with the Ki value obtained by the 2TCM/Patlak analyses, in contrast to the SUV or SUVglu. CONCLUSIONS: From a methodological point of view, the present findings confirm the theoretical limitations of the cerebral SUV and SUVglu as a substitute for Ki in the estimation of glucose consumption in the brain. Our data suggest that the FUR is the surrogate to Ki.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T05:31:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0c9c3bc89a9045a9ae5770633f29859b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1980-5322
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T05:31:02Z
publisher Elsevier España
record_format Article
series Clinics
spelling doaj.art-0c9c3bc89a9045a9ae5770633f29859b2022-12-22T01:19:25ZengElsevier EspañaClinics1980-53227410.6061/clinics/2019/e1273S1807-59322019000100277Comparison of different quantification methods for 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography studies in rat brainsSilvana PrandoCamila de Godoi CarneiroCecil Chow RobilottaMarcelo Tatit SapienzaOBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate several methods to estimate glucose consumption in the male Wister rat brain as measured by PET. METHODS: Fourteen male Wistar normoglycemic rats were studied. The input function consisted of seventeen blood samples drawn manually from the femoral artery. Glucose uptake values were calculated using the input function resulting from the arterial blood samples and the tissue time-activity curve derived from the PET images. The estimated glucose consumption rate (Ki) based on the 2-tissue compartment model (2TCM) served as the standard for comparisons with the values calculated by the Patlak analysis and with the fractional uptake rate (FUR), standardized uptake value (SUV) and glucose corrected SUV (SUVglu). RESULTS: No significant difference between the standard Ki and the Patlak Ki was observed. The standard Ki was also found to have strong correlations and concordance with the Ki value estimated by the Patlak analysis. The FUR method presented an excellent correlation with the Ki value obtained by the 2TCM/Patlak analyses, in contrast to the SUV or SUVglu. CONCLUSIONS: From a methodological point of view, the present findings confirm the theoretical limitations of the cerebral SUV and SUVglu as a substitute for Ki in the estimation of glucose consumption in the brain. Our data suggest that the FUR is the surrogate to Ki.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322019000100277&lng=en&tlng=enQuantification[18F]FDGSUVFURKi
spellingShingle Silvana Prando
Camila de Godoi Carneiro
Cecil Chow Robilotta
Marcelo Tatit Sapienza
Comparison of different quantification methods for 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography studies in rat brains
Clinics
Quantification
[18F]FDG
SUV
FUR
Ki
title Comparison of different quantification methods for 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography studies in rat brains
title_full Comparison of different quantification methods for 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography studies in rat brains
title_fullStr Comparison of different quantification methods for 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography studies in rat brains
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of different quantification methods for 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography studies in rat brains
title_short Comparison of different quantification methods for 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography studies in rat brains
title_sort comparison of different quantification methods for 18f fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography studies in rat brains
topic Quantification
[18F]FDG
SUV
FUR
Ki
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322019000100277&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT silvanaprando comparisonofdifferentquantificationmethodsfor18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographystudiesinratbrains
AT camiladegodoicarneiro comparisonofdifferentquantificationmethodsfor18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographystudiesinratbrains
AT cecilchowrobilotta comparisonofdifferentquantificationmethodsfor18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographystudiesinratbrains
AT marcelotatitsapienza comparisonofdifferentquantificationmethodsfor18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographystudiesinratbrains