Counterparty Credit Limit: Identifikasi, Pengukuran dan Pemetaan Risiko Bank-Bank di Indonesia

This study aims to carry out risk management planning, identification, qualitative analysis and quantitative risk calculations, establishing counterparty credit limits on banks in Indonesia. The risk identification process utilize 59 expert views from the field of financial institution banks in Indo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Saur Costanius Simamora
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Research Center and Case Clearing House, Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen PPM 2021-06-01
Series:Journal of Management and Business Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jmbr.ppm-school.ac.id/index.php/jmbr/article/view/274
_version_ 1797963331502342144
author Saur Costanius Simamora
author_facet Saur Costanius Simamora
author_sort Saur Costanius Simamora
collection DOAJ
description This study aims to carry out risk management planning, identification, qualitative analysis and quantitative risk calculations, establishing counterparty credit limits on banks in Indonesia. The risk identification process utilize 59 expert views from the field of financial institution banks in Indonesia. Subsequently the qualitative analysis stage employ the two dimension rating schemes method, namely probability and impact. Each included risk is measured in the Low, Medium and High category. The identification process resulted in 18 risks that are facing banks in Indonesia. From that risks, the quantitative analysis using Probability - Impact dimension shows that in the Low - Medium quadrant there is 1 risk. In the Medium - Medium quadrant there are 3 risks. In the Medium-High quadrant there are 8 risks. While the High - High quadrant resulted in 6 risks. The Delphi method output from the probability dimension, indicates the risk of error in analyzing the counterparty's financial performance (balance sheet analysis, cashflow, income statement, financial ratio) and not monitoring and recognizing sanctions or legal cases that occur to counterparties give a value of 2.29. While from the Impact dimension, the risk of error in analyzing the counterparty's financial performance (balance analysis, R / L report, financial ratio) give a value of 2.78. All of these results, the experts have reached convergence or consensus.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T01:26:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0ca4f5ad022f4a9baca2313e46d87f67
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1829-8176
2503-0736
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T01:26:48Z
publishDate 2021-06-01
publisher Research Center and Case Clearing House, Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen PPM
record_format Article
series Journal of Management and Business Review
spelling doaj.art-0ca4f5ad022f4a9baca2313e46d87f672023-01-03T10:10:30ZengResearch Center and Case Clearing House, Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen PPMJournal of Management and Business Review1829-81762503-07362021-06-0118220922210.34149/jmbr.v18i2.274144Counterparty Credit Limit: Identifikasi, Pengukuran dan Pemetaan Risiko Bank-Bank di IndonesiaSaur Costanius Simamora0Universitas Dirgantara Marsekal SuryadarmaThis study aims to carry out risk management planning, identification, qualitative analysis and quantitative risk calculations, establishing counterparty credit limits on banks in Indonesia. The risk identification process utilize 59 expert views from the field of financial institution banks in Indonesia. Subsequently the qualitative analysis stage employ the two dimension rating schemes method, namely probability and impact. Each included risk is measured in the Low, Medium and High category. The identification process resulted in 18 risks that are facing banks in Indonesia. From that risks, the quantitative analysis using Probability - Impact dimension shows that in the Low - Medium quadrant there is 1 risk. In the Medium - Medium quadrant there are 3 risks. In the Medium-High quadrant there are 8 risks. While the High - High quadrant resulted in 6 risks. The Delphi method output from the probability dimension, indicates the risk of error in analyzing the counterparty's financial performance (balance sheet analysis, cashflow, income statement, financial ratio) and not monitoring and recognizing sanctions or legal cases that occur to counterparties give a value of 2.29. While from the Impact dimension, the risk of error in analyzing the counterparty's financial performance (balance analysis, R / L report, financial ratio) give a value of 2.78. All of these results, the experts have reached convergence or consensus.https://jmbr.ppm-school.ac.id/index.php/jmbr/article/view/274credit riskexpert opinionrating schemescounterparty limitsdelphi method
spellingShingle Saur Costanius Simamora
Counterparty Credit Limit: Identifikasi, Pengukuran dan Pemetaan Risiko Bank-Bank di Indonesia
Journal of Management and Business Review
credit risk
expert opinion
rating schemes
counterparty limits
delphi method
title Counterparty Credit Limit: Identifikasi, Pengukuran dan Pemetaan Risiko Bank-Bank di Indonesia
title_full Counterparty Credit Limit: Identifikasi, Pengukuran dan Pemetaan Risiko Bank-Bank di Indonesia
title_fullStr Counterparty Credit Limit: Identifikasi, Pengukuran dan Pemetaan Risiko Bank-Bank di Indonesia
title_full_unstemmed Counterparty Credit Limit: Identifikasi, Pengukuran dan Pemetaan Risiko Bank-Bank di Indonesia
title_short Counterparty Credit Limit: Identifikasi, Pengukuran dan Pemetaan Risiko Bank-Bank di Indonesia
title_sort counterparty credit limit identifikasi pengukuran dan pemetaan risiko bank bank di indonesia
topic credit risk
expert opinion
rating schemes
counterparty limits
delphi method
url https://jmbr.ppm-school.ac.id/index.php/jmbr/article/view/274
work_keys_str_mv AT saurcostaniussimamora counterpartycreditlimitidentifikasipengukurandanpemetaanrisikobankbankdiindonesia