Do Online Voting Patterns Reflect Evolved Features of Human Cognition? An Exploratory Empirical Investigation.
Online votes or ratings can assist internet users in evaluating the credibility and appeal of the information which they encounter. For example, aggregator websites such as Reddit allow users to up-vote submitted content to make it more prominent, and down-vote content to make it less prominent. Her...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2015-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129703 |
| _version_ | 1819148440887623680 |
|---|---|
| author | Maria Priestley Alex Mesoudi |
| author_facet | Maria Priestley Alex Mesoudi |
| author_sort | Maria Priestley |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Online votes or ratings can assist internet users in evaluating the credibility and appeal of the information which they encounter. For example, aggregator websites such as Reddit allow users to up-vote submitted content to make it more prominent, and down-vote content to make it less prominent. Here we argue that decisions over what to up- or down-vote may be guided by evolved features of human cognition. We predict that internet users should be more likely to up-vote content that others have also up-voted (social influence), content that has been submitted by particularly liked or respected users (model-based bias), content that constitutes evolutionarily salient or relevant information (content bias), and content that follows group norms and, in particular, prosocial norms. 489 respondents from the online social voting community Reddit rated the extent to which they felt different traits influenced their voting. Statistical analyses confirmed that norm-following and prosociality, as well as various content biases such as emotional content and originality, were rated as important motivators of voting. Social influence had a smaller effect than expected, while attitudes towards the submitter had little effect. This exploratory empirical investigation suggests that online voting communities can provide an important test-bed for evolutionary theories of human social information use, and that evolved features of human cognition may guide online behaviour just as it guides behaviour in the offline world. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-22T13:45:45Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-0ca5b08a196f4428a654adec28f2fd08 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-22T13:45:45Z |
| publishDate | 2015-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-0ca5b08a196f4428a654adec28f2fd082022-12-21T18:23:47ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01106e012970310.1371/journal.pone.0129703Do Online Voting Patterns Reflect Evolved Features of Human Cognition? An Exploratory Empirical Investigation.Maria PriestleyAlex MesoudiOnline votes or ratings can assist internet users in evaluating the credibility and appeal of the information which they encounter. For example, aggregator websites such as Reddit allow users to up-vote submitted content to make it more prominent, and down-vote content to make it less prominent. Here we argue that decisions over what to up- or down-vote may be guided by evolved features of human cognition. We predict that internet users should be more likely to up-vote content that others have also up-voted (social influence), content that has been submitted by particularly liked or respected users (model-based bias), content that constitutes evolutionarily salient or relevant information (content bias), and content that follows group norms and, in particular, prosocial norms. 489 respondents from the online social voting community Reddit rated the extent to which they felt different traits influenced their voting. Statistical analyses confirmed that norm-following and prosociality, as well as various content biases such as emotional content and originality, were rated as important motivators of voting. Social influence had a smaller effect than expected, while attitudes towards the submitter had little effect. This exploratory empirical investigation suggests that online voting communities can provide an important test-bed for evolutionary theories of human social information use, and that evolved features of human cognition may guide online behaviour just as it guides behaviour in the offline world.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129703 |
| spellingShingle | Maria Priestley Alex Mesoudi Do Online Voting Patterns Reflect Evolved Features of Human Cognition? An Exploratory Empirical Investigation. PLoS ONE |
| title | Do Online Voting Patterns Reflect Evolved Features of Human Cognition? An Exploratory Empirical Investigation. |
| title_full | Do Online Voting Patterns Reflect Evolved Features of Human Cognition? An Exploratory Empirical Investigation. |
| title_fullStr | Do Online Voting Patterns Reflect Evolved Features of Human Cognition? An Exploratory Empirical Investigation. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Do Online Voting Patterns Reflect Evolved Features of Human Cognition? An Exploratory Empirical Investigation. |
| title_short | Do Online Voting Patterns Reflect Evolved Features of Human Cognition? An Exploratory Empirical Investigation. |
| title_sort | do online voting patterns reflect evolved features of human cognition an exploratory empirical investigation |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129703 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mariapriestley doonlinevotingpatternsreflectevolvedfeaturesofhumancognitionanexploratoryempiricalinvestigation AT alexmesoudi doonlinevotingpatternsreflectevolvedfeaturesofhumancognitionanexploratoryempiricalinvestigation |