The utility of margin-reflex distance in determining the type of surgical intervention for congenital blepharoptosis

Aims: To evaluate the utility of margin-reflex distance (MRD) as an alternative to levator function (LF) in choosing the appropriate surgical procedure for congenital blepharoptosis. Settings and Design: This was a retrospective, observational study. Subjects and Methods: Records of patients with si...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ozlem Ural, Mehmet Cem Mocan, Anıl Dolgun, Ugur Erdener
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2016-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2016;volume=64;issue=10;spage=752;epage=755;aulast=Ural
_version_ 1811253912576983040
author Ozlem Ural
Mehmet Cem Mocan
Anıl Dolgun
Ugur Erdener
author_facet Ozlem Ural
Mehmet Cem Mocan
Anıl Dolgun
Ugur Erdener
author_sort Ozlem Ural
collection DOAJ
description Aims: To evaluate the utility of margin-reflex distance (MRD) as an alternative to levator function (LF) in choosing the appropriate surgical procedure for congenital blepharoptosis. Settings and Design: This was a retrospective, observational study. Subjects and Methods: Records of patients with simple (dystrophic) congenital ptosis who were operated and followed for ≥6 months postoperatively and whose outcomes were deemed as successful were evaluated in the study. Success was defined as a MRD at the last postoperative visit of ≥3 mm. In all cases, levator resection was performed when LF was >4 mm and frontalis suspension when LF was ≤4 mm. Statistical Analysis Used: For statistical evaluations, LF was accepted as the gold standard parameter for deciding on the surgical intervention, and the optimum cutoff point for initial MRD was determined as the point at which sensitivity and specificity was highest at the receiving operating curve for the selection of surgical procedure. Results: Of one hundred and three eyes of ninety patients (44 female/46 male), levator resection was used in 44.7% and frontalis suspension in 55.3%. When the optimum cutoff point for MRD was determined as 0.5 mm, the sensitivity was 71%, specificity was 86%, and the area under the curve that represented the discriminative power of this parameter was found to be 0.826. Conclusion: The MRD at the cutoff point of 0.5 mm may be used as an alternative to LF to determine the type of surgical intervention in patients with congenital blepharoptosis whose LF cannot be reliably obtained in clinical evaluations.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T16:59:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0caff23c8dcd4abda67d22e8848d069e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0301-4738
1998-3689
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T16:59:14Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj.art-0caff23c8dcd4abda67d22e8848d069e2022-12-22T03:24:07ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Ophthalmology0301-47381998-36892016-01-01641075275510.4103/0301-4738.195016The utility of margin-reflex distance in determining the type of surgical intervention for congenital blepharoptosisOzlem UralMehmet Cem MocanAnıl DolgunUgur ErdenerAims: To evaluate the utility of margin-reflex distance (MRD) as an alternative to levator function (LF) in choosing the appropriate surgical procedure for congenital blepharoptosis. Settings and Design: This was a retrospective, observational study. Subjects and Methods: Records of patients with simple (dystrophic) congenital ptosis who were operated and followed for ≥6 months postoperatively and whose outcomes were deemed as successful were evaluated in the study. Success was defined as a MRD at the last postoperative visit of ≥3 mm. In all cases, levator resection was performed when LF was >4 mm and frontalis suspension when LF was ≤4 mm. Statistical Analysis Used: For statistical evaluations, LF was accepted as the gold standard parameter for deciding on the surgical intervention, and the optimum cutoff point for initial MRD was determined as the point at which sensitivity and specificity was highest at the receiving operating curve for the selection of surgical procedure. Results: Of one hundred and three eyes of ninety patients (44 female/46 male), levator resection was used in 44.7% and frontalis suspension in 55.3%. When the optimum cutoff point for MRD was determined as 0.5 mm, the sensitivity was 71%, specificity was 86%, and the area under the curve that represented the discriminative power of this parameter was found to be 0.826. Conclusion: The MRD at the cutoff point of 0.5 mm may be used as an alternative to LF to determine the type of surgical intervention in patients with congenital blepharoptosis whose LF cannot be reliably obtained in clinical evaluations.http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2016;volume=64;issue=10;spage=752;epage=755;aulast=UralCongenital ptosislevator functionmargin-reflex distance
spellingShingle Ozlem Ural
Mehmet Cem Mocan
Anıl Dolgun
Ugur Erdener
The utility of margin-reflex distance in determining the type of surgical intervention for congenital blepharoptosis
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Congenital ptosis
levator function
margin-reflex distance
title The utility of margin-reflex distance in determining the type of surgical intervention for congenital blepharoptosis
title_full The utility of margin-reflex distance in determining the type of surgical intervention for congenital blepharoptosis
title_fullStr The utility of margin-reflex distance in determining the type of surgical intervention for congenital blepharoptosis
title_full_unstemmed The utility of margin-reflex distance in determining the type of surgical intervention for congenital blepharoptosis
title_short The utility of margin-reflex distance in determining the type of surgical intervention for congenital blepharoptosis
title_sort utility of margin reflex distance in determining the type of surgical intervention for congenital blepharoptosis
topic Congenital ptosis
levator function
margin-reflex distance
url http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2016;volume=64;issue=10;spage=752;epage=755;aulast=Ural
work_keys_str_mv AT ozlemural theutilityofmarginreflexdistanceindeterminingthetypeofsurgicalinterventionforcongenitalblepharoptosis
AT mehmetcemmocan theutilityofmarginreflexdistanceindeterminingthetypeofsurgicalinterventionforcongenitalblepharoptosis
AT anıldolgun theutilityofmarginreflexdistanceindeterminingthetypeofsurgicalinterventionforcongenitalblepharoptosis
AT ugurerdener theutilityofmarginreflexdistanceindeterminingthetypeofsurgicalinterventionforcongenitalblepharoptosis
AT ozlemural utilityofmarginreflexdistanceindeterminingthetypeofsurgicalinterventionforcongenitalblepharoptosis
AT mehmetcemmocan utilityofmarginreflexdistanceindeterminingthetypeofsurgicalinterventionforcongenitalblepharoptosis
AT anıldolgun utilityofmarginreflexdistanceindeterminingthetypeofsurgicalinterventionforcongenitalblepharoptosis
AT ugurerdener utilityofmarginreflexdistanceindeterminingthetypeofsurgicalinterventionforcongenitalblepharoptosis