Validation of the Whooley questions for antenatal depression and anxiety among low-income women in urban South Africa

Background/objective: In South Africa, approximately 40% of women suffer from depression during pregnancy. Although perinatal depression and anxiety are significant public health problems impacting maternal and infant morbidity and mortality, no routine mental health screening programmes exist in th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carina Marsay, Lenore Manderson, Ugasvaree Subramaney
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AOSIS 2017-04-01
Series:South African Journal of Psychiatry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://sajp.org.za/index.php/sajp/article/view/1013
_version_ 1811291424523550720
author Carina Marsay
Lenore Manderson
Ugasvaree Subramaney
author_facet Carina Marsay
Lenore Manderson
Ugasvaree Subramaney
author_sort Carina Marsay
collection DOAJ
description Background/objective: In South Africa, approximately 40% of women suffer from depression during pregnancy. Although perinatal depression and anxiety are significant public health problems impacting maternal and infant morbidity and mortality, no routine mental health screening programmes exist in the country. A practical, accurate screening tool is needed to identify cases in these busy, resource-scarce settings. Method: A convenience sample of 145 women between 22 and 28 weeks gestation was recruited from Rahima Moosa Hospital antenatal clinic in Johannesburg. All women completed a biographical interview, the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), the Whooley questions and a structured clinical interview. Results: The results demonstrate the sensitivity and specificity of the Whooley questions and the EPDS in identifying depression, anxiety and stress disorders of varying severity. The importance of personal, social and cultural context in influencing the content and expression of these common perinatal conditions was also identified. Discussion and conclusion: The validity of the Whooley questions in the context of urban South Africa, and the importance of ensuring clinical interviews to supplement any screening tools, is emphasised.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T04:29:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0ccfcb31880142e4a57a4cbb3e0757c5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1608-9685
2078-6786
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T04:29:10Z
publishDate 2017-04-01
publisher AOSIS
record_format Article
series South African Journal of Psychiatry
spelling doaj.art-0ccfcb31880142e4a57a4cbb3e0757c52022-12-22T03:02:23ZengAOSISSouth African Journal of Psychiatry1608-96852078-67862017-04-0123010.4102/sajpsychiatry.v23i0.1013366Validation of the Whooley questions for antenatal depression and anxiety among low-income women in urban South AfricaCarina Marsay0Lenore Manderson1Ugasvaree Subramaney2Department of Psychiatry, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the WitwatersrandSchool of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand,Department of Psychiatry, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa and Sterkfontein HospitalBackground/objective: In South Africa, approximately 40% of women suffer from depression during pregnancy. Although perinatal depression and anxiety are significant public health problems impacting maternal and infant morbidity and mortality, no routine mental health screening programmes exist in the country. A practical, accurate screening tool is needed to identify cases in these busy, resource-scarce settings. Method: A convenience sample of 145 women between 22 and 28 weeks gestation was recruited from Rahima Moosa Hospital antenatal clinic in Johannesburg. All women completed a biographical interview, the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), the Whooley questions and a structured clinical interview. Results: The results demonstrate the sensitivity and specificity of the Whooley questions and the EPDS in identifying depression, anxiety and stress disorders of varying severity. The importance of personal, social and cultural context in influencing the content and expression of these common perinatal conditions was also identified. Discussion and conclusion: The validity of the Whooley questions in the context of urban South Africa, and the importance of ensuring clinical interviews to supplement any screening tools, is emphasised.https://sajp.org.za/index.php/sajp/article/view/1013perinatal depressionscreeningSouth Africa
spellingShingle Carina Marsay
Lenore Manderson
Ugasvaree Subramaney
Validation of the Whooley questions for antenatal depression and anxiety among low-income women in urban South Africa
South African Journal of Psychiatry
perinatal depression
screening
South Africa
title Validation of the Whooley questions for antenatal depression and anxiety among low-income women in urban South Africa
title_full Validation of the Whooley questions for antenatal depression and anxiety among low-income women in urban South Africa
title_fullStr Validation of the Whooley questions for antenatal depression and anxiety among low-income women in urban South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the Whooley questions for antenatal depression and anxiety among low-income women in urban South Africa
title_short Validation of the Whooley questions for antenatal depression and anxiety among low-income women in urban South Africa
title_sort validation of the whooley questions for antenatal depression and anxiety among low income women in urban south africa
topic perinatal depression
screening
South Africa
url https://sajp.org.za/index.php/sajp/article/view/1013
work_keys_str_mv AT carinamarsay validationofthewhooleyquestionsforantenataldepressionandanxietyamonglowincomewomeninurbansouthafrica
AT lenoremanderson validationofthewhooleyquestionsforantenataldepressionandanxietyamonglowincomewomeninurbansouthafrica
AT ugasvareesubramaney validationofthewhooleyquestionsforantenataldepressionandanxietyamonglowincomewomeninurbansouthafrica