Wording effects in moral judgments
As the study of moral judgments grows, it becomes imperative to compare results across studies in order to create unified theories within the field. These efforts are potentially undermined, however, by variations in wording used by different researchers. The current study sought to determine whethe...
Main Authors: | Ross E. O’Hara, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, Nicholas A. Sinnott-Armstrong |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2010-12-01
|
Series: | Judgment and Decision Making |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1930297500001716/type/journal_article |
Similar Items
-
Wording effects in moral judgments
by: Ross E. O'Hara, et al.
Published: (2010-12-01) -
Moral conformity in online interactions: rational justifications increase influence of peer opinions on moral judgments
by: Meagan Kelly, et al.
Published: (2017-07-01) -
Trolley problems in context
by: Christopher Shallow, et al.
Published: (2011-10-01) -
Does autonomous moral reasoning favor consequentialism?
by: Caner Turan
Published: (2022-01-01) -
Trolley problems in context
by: Christopher Shallow, et al.
Published: (2011-10-01)