Repeated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Improving Cognition in Alzheimer Disease: Protocol for an Interim Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

BackgroundMany clinical trials investigating treatment efficacy require an interim analysis. Recently we have been running a large, multisite, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial investigating the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zahra Moussavi, Lisa Koski, Paul B Fitzgerald, Colleen Millikin, Brian Lithgow, Mohammad Jafari-Jozani, Xikui Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2021-08-01
Series:JMIR Research Protocols
Online Access:https://www.researchprotocols.org/2021/8/e31183
_version_ 1797735779660726272
author Zahra Moussavi
Lisa Koski
Paul B Fitzgerald
Colleen Millikin
Brian Lithgow
Mohammad Jafari-Jozani
Xikui Wang
author_facet Zahra Moussavi
Lisa Koski
Paul B Fitzgerald
Colleen Millikin
Brian Lithgow
Mohammad Jafari-Jozani
Xikui Wang
author_sort Zahra Moussavi
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundMany clinical trials investigating treatment efficacy require an interim analysis. Recently we have been running a large, multisite, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial investigating the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment for improving or stabilizing the cognition of patients diagnosed with Alzheimer disease. ObjectiveThe objectives of this paper are to report on recruitment, adherence, and adverse events (AEs) to date, and to describe in detail the protocol for interim analysis of the clinical trial data. The protocol will investigate whether the trial is likely to reach its objectives if continued to the planned maximum sample size. MethodsThe specific requirements of the analytic protocol are to (1) ensure the double-blind nature of the data while doing the analysis, (2) estimate the predictive probabilities of success (PPoSs), (3) estimate the numbers needed to treat, (4) re-estimate the initial required sample size. The initial estimate of sample size was 208. The interim analysis will be based on 150 patients who will be enrolled in the study and finish at least 8 weeks of the study. Our protocol for interim analysis, at the very first stage, is to determine the response rate for each participant to the treatment (either sham or active), while ensuring the double-blind nature of the data. The blinded data will be analyzed by a statistician to investigate the treatment efficacy. We will use Bayesian PPoS to predict the success rate and determine whether the study should continue. ResultsThe enrollment has been slowed significantly due to the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown. Nevertheless, so far 133 participants have been enrolled, while 22 of these have been withdrawn or dropped out for various reasons. In general, rTMS has been found tolerable with no serious AE. Only 2 patients dropped out of the study due to their intolerability to rTMS pulses. ConclusionsOverall, the study with the same protocol is going as expected with no serious AE or any major protocol deviation. Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02908815; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02908815 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)DERR1-10.2196/31183
first_indexed 2024-03-12T13:04:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0cd5189d4939416dac097efbe301771f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1929-0748
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T13:04:02Z
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format Article
series JMIR Research Protocols
spelling doaj.art-0cd5189d4939416dac097efbe301771f2023-08-28T18:28:46ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Research Protocols1929-07482021-08-01108e3118310.2196/31183Repeated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Improving Cognition in Alzheimer Disease: Protocol for an Interim Analysis of a Randomized Controlled TrialZahra Moussavihttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9202-949XLisa Koskihttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4135-5567Paul B Fitzgeraldhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4217-8096Colleen Millikinhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3228-308XBrian Lithgowhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4631-9485Mohammad Jafari-Jozanihttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2147-6337Xikui Wanghttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4157-396X BackgroundMany clinical trials investigating treatment efficacy require an interim analysis. Recently we have been running a large, multisite, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial investigating the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment for improving or stabilizing the cognition of patients diagnosed with Alzheimer disease. ObjectiveThe objectives of this paper are to report on recruitment, adherence, and adverse events (AEs) to date, and to describe in detail the protocol for interim analysis of the clinical trial data. The protocol will investigate whether the trial is likely to reach its objectives if continued to the planned maximum sample size. MethodsThe specific requirements of the analytic protocol are to (1) ensure the double-blind nature of the data while doing the analysis, (2) estimate the predictive probabilities of success (PPoSs), (3) estimate the numbers needed to treat, (4) re-estimate the initial required sample size. The initial estimate of sample size was 208. The interim analysis will be based on 150 patients who will be enrolled in the study and finish at least 8 weeks of the study. Our protocol for interim analysis, at the very first stage, is to determine the response rate for each participant to the treatment (either sham or active), while ensuring the double-blind nature of the data. The blinded data will be analyzed by a statistician to investigate the treatment efficacy. We will use Bayesian PPoS to predict the success rate and determine whether the study should continue. ResultsThe enrollment has been slowed significantly due to the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown. Nevertheless, so far 133 participants have been enrolled, while 22 of these have been withdrawn or dropped out for various reasons. In general, rTMS has been found tolerable with no serious AE. Only 2 patients dropped out of the study due to their intolerability to rTMS pulses. ConclusionsOverall, the study with the same protocol is going as expected with no serious AE or any major protocol deviation. Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02908815; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02908815 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)DERR1-10.2196/31183https://www.researchprotocols.org/2021/8/e31183
spellingShingle Zahra Moussavi
Lisa Koski
Paul B Fitzgerald
Colleen Millikin
Brian Lithgow
Mohammad Jafari-Jozani
Xikui Wang
Repeated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Improving Cognition in Alzheimer Disease: Protocol for an Interim Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial
JMIR Research Protocols
title Repeated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Improving Cognition in Alzheimer Disease: Protocol for an Interim Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Repeated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Improving Cognition in Alzheimer Disease: Protocol for an Interim Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Repeated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Improving Cognition in Alzheimer Disease: Protocol for an Interim Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Repeated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Improving Cognition in Alzheimer Disease: Protocol for an Interim Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Repeated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Improving Cognition in Alzheimer Disease: Protocol for an Interim Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation for improving cognition in alzheimer disease protocol for an interim analysis of a randomized controlled trial
url https://www.researchprotocols.org/2021/8/e31183
work_keys_str_mv AT zahramoussavi repeatedtranscranialmagneticstimulationforimprovingcognitioninalzheimerdiseaseprotocolforaninterimanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lisakoski repeatedtranscranialmagneticstimulationforimprovingcognitioninalzheimerdiseaseprotocolforaninterimanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT paulbfitzgerald repeatedtranscranialmagneticstimulationforimprovingcognitioninalzheimerdiseaseprotocolforaninterimanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT colleenmillikin repeatedtranscranialmagneticstimulationforimprovingcognitioninalzheimerdiseaseprotocolforaninterimanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT brianlithgow repeatedtranscranialmagneticstimulationforimprovingcognitioninalzheimerdiseaseprotocolforaninterimanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mohammadjafarijozani repeatedtranscranialmagneticstimulationforimprovingcognitioninalzheimerdiseaseprotocolforaninterimanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT xikuiwang repeatedtranscranialmagneticstimulationforimprovingcognitioninalzheimerdiseaseprotocolforaninterimanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial