Kidney volume measurement methods for clinical studies on autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND:In autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), total kidney volume (TKV) is regarded as an important biomarker of disease progression and different methods are available to assess kidney volume. The purpose of this study was to identify the most efficient kidney volume computati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kanishka Sharma, Anna Caroli, Le Van Quach, Katja Petzold, Michela Bozzetto, Andreas L Serra, Giuseppe Remuzzi, Andrea Remuzzi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5448775?pdf=render
_version_ 1818295050942021632
author Kanishka Sharma
Anna Caroli
Le Van Quach
Katja Petzold
Michela Bozzetto
Andreas L Serra
Giuseppe Remuzzi
Andrea Remuzzi
author_facet Kanishka Sharma
Anna Caroli
Le Van Quach
Katja Petzold
Michela Bozzetto
Andreas L Serra
Giuseppe Remuzzi
Andrea Remuzzi
author_sort Kanishka Sharma
collection DOAJ
description BACKGROUND:In autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), total kidney volume (TKV) is regarded as an important biomarker of disease progression and different methods are available to assess kidney volume. The purpose of this study was to identify the most efficient kidney volume computation method to be used in clinical studies evaluating the effectiveness of treatments on ADPKD progression. METHODS AND FINDINGS:We measured single kidney volume (SKV) on two series of MR and CT images from clinical studies on ADPKD (experimental dataset) by two independent operators (expert and beginner), twice, using all of the available methods: polyline manual tracing (reference method), free-hand manual tracing, semi-automatic tracing, Stereology, Mid-slice and Ellipsoid method. Additionally, the expert operator also measured the kidney length. We compared different methods for reproducibility, accuracy, precision, and time required. In addition, we performed a validation study to evaluate the sensitivity of these methods to detect the between-treatment group difference in TKV change over one year, using MR images from a previous clinical study. Reproducibility was higher on CT than MR for all methods, being highest for manual and semiautomatic contouring methods (planimetry). On MR, planimetry showed highest accuracy and precision, while on CT accuracy and precision of both planimetry and Stereology methods were comparable. Mid-slice and Ellipsoid method, as well as kidney length were fast but provided only a rough estimate of kidney volume. The results of the validation study indicated that planimetry and Stereology allow using an importantly lower number of patients to detect changes in kidney volume induced by drug treatment as compared to other methods. CONCLUSIONS:Planimetry should be preferred over fast and simplified methods for accurately monitoring ADPKD progression and assessing drug treatment effects. Expert operators, especially on MR images, are required for performing reliable estimation of kidney volume. The use of efficient TKV quantification methods considerably reduces the number of patients to enrol in clinical investigations, making them more feasible and significant.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T03:41:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0cdb10102de84b71a657ed62b01fc023
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T03:41:29Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-0cdb10102de84b71a657ed62b01fc0232022-12-22T00:00:56ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01125e017848810.1371/journal.pone.0178488Kidney volume measurement methods for clinical studies on autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.Kanishka SharmaAnna CaroliLe Van QuachKatja PetzoldMichela BozzettoAndreas L SerraGiuseppe RemuzziAndrea RemuzziBACKGROUND:In autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), total kidney volume (TKV) is regarded as an important biomarker of disease progression and different methods are available to assess kidney volume. The purpose of this study was to identify the most efficient kidney volume computation method to be used in clinical studies evaluating the effectiveness of treatments on ADPKD progression. METHODS AND FINDINGS:We measured single kidney volume (SKV) on two series of MR and CT images from clinical studies on ADPKD (experimental dataset) by two independent operators (expert and beginner), twice, using all of the available methods: polyline manual tracing (reference method), free-hand manual tracing, semi-automatic tracing, Stereology, Mid-slice and Ellipsoid method. Additionally, the expert operator also measured the kidney length. We compared different methods for reproducibility, accuracy, precision, and time required. In addition, we performed a validation study to evaluate the sensitivity of these methods to detect the between-treatment group difference in TKV change over one year, using MR images from a previous clinical study. Reproducibility was higher on CT than MR for all methods, being highest for manual and semiautomatic contouring methods (planimetry). On MR, planimetry showed highest accuracy and precision, while on CT accuracy and precision of both planimetry and Stereology methods were comparable. Mid-slice and Ellipsoid method, as well as kidney length were fast but provided only a rough estimate of kidney volume. The results of the validation study indicated that planimetry and Stereology allow using an importantly lower number of patients to detect changes in kidney volume induced by drug treatment as compared to other methods. CONCLUSIONS:Planimetry should be preferred over fast and simplified methods for accurately monitoring ADPKD progression and assessing drug treatment effects. Expert operators, especially on MR images, are required for performing reliable estimation of kidney volume. The use of efficient TKV quantification methods considerably reduces the number of patients to enrol in clinical investigations, making them more feasible and significant.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5448775?pdf=render
spellingShingle Kanishka Sharma
Anna Caroli
Le Van Quach
Katja Petzold
Michela Bozzetto
Andreas L Serra
Giuseppe Remuzzi
Andrea Remuzzi
Kidney volume measurement methods for clinical studies on autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.
PLoS ONE
title Kidney volume measurement methods for clinical studies on autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.
title_full Kidney volume measurement methods for clinical studies on autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.
title_fullStr Kidney volume measurement methods for clinical studies on autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.
title_full_unstemmed Kidney volume measurement methods for clinical studies on autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.
title_short Kidney volume measurement methods for clinical studies on autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.
title_sort kidney volume measurement methods for clinical studies on autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5448775?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT kanishkasharma kidneyvolumemeasurementmethodsforclinicalstudiesonautosomaldominantpolycystickidneydisease
AT annacaroli kidneyvolumemeasurementmethodsforclinicalstudiesonautosomaldominantpolycystickidneydisease
AT levanquach kidneyvolumemeasurementmethodsforclinicalstudiesonautosomaldominantpolycystickidneydisease
AT katjapetzold kidneyvolumemeasurementmethodsforclinicalstudiesonautosomaldominantpolycystickidneydisease
AT michelabozzetto kidneyvolumemeasurementmethodsforclinicalstudiesonautosomaldominantpolycystickidneydisease
AT andreaslserra kidneyvolumemeasurementmethodsforclinicalstudiesonautosomaldominantpolycystickidneydisease
AT giusepperemuzzi kidneyvolumemeasurementmethodsforclinicalstudiesonautosomaldominantpolycystickidneydisease
AT andrearemuzzi kidneyvolumemeasurementmethodsforclinicalstudiesonautosomaldominantpolycystickidneydisease