Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0.
Improving the reproducibility of biomedical research is a major challenge. Transparent and accurate reporting is vital to this process; it allows readers to assess the reliability of the findings and repeat or build upon the work of other researchers. The ARRIVE guidelines (Animal Research: Reportin...
Main Authors: | Nathalie Percie du Sert, Amrita Ahluwalia, Sabina Alam, Marc T Avey, Monya Baker, William J Browne, Alejandra Clark, Innes C Cuthill, Ulrich Dirnagl, Michael Emerson, Paul Garner, Stephen T Holgate, David W Howells, Viki Hurst, Natasha A Karp, Stanley E Lazic, Katie Lidster, Catriona J MacCallum, Malcolm Macleod, Esther J Pearl, Ole H Petersen, Frances Rawle, Penny Reynolds, Kieron Rooney, Emily S Sena, Shai D Silberberg, Thomas Steckler, Hanno Würbel |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2020-07-01
|
Series: | PLoS Biology |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000411 |
Similar Items
-
The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research.
by: Nathalie Percie du Sert, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01) -
Revision of the ARRIVE guidelines: rationale and scope
by: du Sert, N, et al.
Published: (2018) -
A qualitative study of the barriers to using blinding in in vivo experiments and suggestions for improvement.
by: Natasha A Karp, et al.
Published: (2022-11-01) -
Improving the reporting of animal research: when will we ARRIVE?
by: Nathalie Percie du Sert
Published: (2011-05-01) -
Why Is More Than 5.
by: Catriona J. MacCallum
Published: (2011-12-01)