Bacteria in Normal Canine Milk Analyzed by Blood Agar Medium

Studies of microbiota in normal canine milk from healthy dams are sparse. As is the case with blood and urine, it was considered that milk contains no microbiota. Any discovery of bacteria in canine milk is, therefore, often noted to be a result of contamination during sampling or interpreted as mas...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sabina Sibcic Kolasinac, Lars Moe, Vibeke Rootwelt, Henning Sørum
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-07-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/13/13/2206
_version_ 1797592175100297216
author Sabina Sibcic Kolasinac
Lars Moe
Vibeke Rootwelt
Henning Sørum
author_facet Sabina Sibcic Kolasinac
Lars Moe
Vibeke Rootwelt
Henning Sørum
author_sort Sabina Sibcic Kolasinac
collection DOAJ
description Studies of microbiota in normal canine milk from healthy dams are sparse. As is the case with blood and urine, it was considered that milk contains no microbiota. Any discovery of bacteria in canine milk is, therefore, often noted to be a result of contamination during sampling or interpreted as mastitis and treated with antibiotics. Milk was collected twice within 19 days after natural parturition from 11 lactating dams, with no general or local clinical signs of mastitis or other disease. The skin and teats were prepared with an antimicrobial protocol prior to each milk sampling. In total, 210 milk samples were collected and assessed for a number of bacterial colonies grown on each plate. Bacterial growth was detected in 180 samples (86%). <i>Staphylococcus pseudintermedius</i>, <i>Enterococcus</i> spp., <i>Clostridium</i> spp., Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci (CoNS), <i>Streptococcus</i> spp., <i>Streptococcus canis</i>, <i>Bacillus</i> spp., <i>Pasteurella</i> spp., and <i>Escherichia coli</i> were identified from pure and/or mixed bacterial growth, listed in descending order of occurrence. Despite the small sample size, the consistent occurrence of bacteria in early postpartum dams indicates a genuine occurrence of bacteria in canine milk, rather than random contamination. The finding of bacteria in the milk of dams should not, therefore, be the sole argument for the diagnosis of mastitis.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T01:47:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0cdf1bbacf814771b7d7695b84f39521
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-2615
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T01:47:43Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Animals
spelling doaj.art-0cdf1bbacf814771b7d7695b84f395212023-11-18T16:04:33ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152023-07-011313220610.3390/ani13132206Bacteria in Normal Canine Milk Analyzed by Blood Agar MediumSabina Sibcic Kolasinac0Lars Moe1Vibeke Rootwelt2Henning Sørum3Department of Companion Animal Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Elizabeth Stephansens vei 15, 1433 Ås, NorwayDepartment of Companion Animal Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Elizabeth Stephansens vei 15, 1433 Ås, NorwayDepartment of Companion Animal Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Elizabeth Stephansens vei 15, 1433 Ås, NorwayDepartment of Paraclinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Elizabeth Stephansens vei 15, 1433 Ås, NorwayStudies of microbiota in normal canine milk from healthy dams are sparse. As is the case with blood and urine, it was considered that milk contains no microbiota. Any discovery of bacteria in canine milk is, therefore, often noted to be a result of contamination during sampling or interpreted as mastitis and treated with antibiotics. Milk was collected twice within 19 days after natural parturition from 11 lactating dams, with no general or local clinical signs of mastitis or other disease. The skin and teats were prepared with an antimicrobial protocol prior to each milk sampling. In total, 210 milk samples were collected and assessed for a number of bacterial colonies grown on each plate. Bacterial growth was detected in 180 samples (86%). <i>Staphylococcus pseudintermedius</i>, <i>Enterococcus</i> spp., <i>Clostridium</i> spp., Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci (CoNS), <i>Streptococcus</i> spp., <i>Streptococcus canis</i>, <i>Bacillus</i> spp., <i>Pasteurella</i> spp., and <i>Escherichia coli</i> were identified from pure and/or mixed bacterial growth, listed in descending order of occurrence. Despite the small sample size, the consistent occurrence of bacteria in early postpartum dams indicates a genuine occurrence of bacteria in canine milk, rather than random contamination. The finding of bacteria in the milk of dams should not, therefore, be the sole argument for the diagnosis of mastitis.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/13/13/2206culturable microbiomedoglactationmammary glandcanine milk bacteriome
spellingShingle Sabina Sibcic Kolasinac
Lars Moe
Vibeke Rootwelt
Henning Sørum
Bacteria in Normal Canine Milk Analyzed by Blood Agar Medium
Animals
culturable microbiome
dog
lactation
mammary gland
canine milk bacteriome
title Bacteria in Normal Canine Milk Analyzed by Blood Agar Medium
title_full Bacteria in Normal Canine Milk Analyzed by Blood Agar Medium
title_fullStr Bacteria in Normal Canine Milk Analyzed by Blood Agar Medium
title_full_unstemmed Bacteria in Normal Canine Milk Analyzed by Blood Agar Medium
title_short Bacteria in Normal Canine Milk Analyzed by Blood Agar Medium
title_sort bacteria in normal canine milk analyzed by blood agar medium
topic culturable microbiome
dog
lactation
mammary gland
canine milk bacteriome
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/13/13/2206
work_keys_str_mv AT sabinasibcickolasinac bacteriainnormalcaninemilkanalyzedbybloodagarmedium
AT larsmoe bacteriainnormalcaninemilkanalyzedbybloodagarmedium
AT vibekerootwelt bacteriainnormalcaninemilkanalyzedbybloodagarmedium
AT henningsørum bacteriainnormalcaninemilkanalyzedbybloodagarmedium