Immunohistochemical HER2 Status Evaluation in Breast Cancer Pathology Samples: A Multicenter, Parallel-Design Concordance Study

Objective: As patients with increased human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) overexpression are more likely to benefit from trastuzumab treatment, the accuracy of HER2 receptor status in breast cancer patients is significant for appropriate disease management. However, this assessment is not...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tülay Canda, Ekrem Yavuz, Necmettin Özdemir, Sennur İlvan, Serpil Sak Dizbay, Merih Güray Durak, Sıtkı Tuzlalı, Osman Zekioğlu, Atakan Demir, Handan Onur, Kasım Üstündağ, Burçe Göktaş
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Galenos Publishing House 2018-07-01
Series:European Journal of Breast Health
Subjects:
Online Access: http://www.eurjbreasthealth.com/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/mmunohistochemical-her2-status-evaluation-in-breas/42039
_version_ 1797910422327656448
author Tülay Canda
Ekrem Yavuz
Necmettin Özdemir
Sennur İlvan
Serpil Sak Dizbay
Merih Güray Durak
Sıtkı Tuzlalı
Osman Zekioğlu
Atakan Demir
Handan Onur
Kasım Üstündağ
Burçe Göktaş
author_facet Tülay Canda
Ekrem Yavuz
Necmettin Özdemir
Sennur İlvan
Serpil Sak Dizbay
Merih Güray Durak
Sıtkı Tuzlalı
Osman Zekioğlu
Atakan Demir
Handan Onur
Kasım Üstündağ
Burçe Göktaş
author_sort Tülay Canda
collection DOAJ
description Objective: As patients with increased human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) overexpression are more likely to benefit from trastuzumab treatment, the accuracy of HER2 receptor status in breast cancer patients is significant for appropriate disease management. However, this assessment is not harmonized and results may be highly variable between centers. The aim of this study was to investigate the degree of interlaboratory variability in the results of HER2 expression reported by 5 participating centers and to assess the concordance between these centers and a reference laboratory.Materials and Methods: A total of 30 breast cancer samples were tested and scored for HER2 expression using immunohistochemical method in 5 centers from Turkey and in a reference laboratory from Netherlands (Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam). All the participating centers had an experience of more than 10 years regarding the HER2 testing. The results were compared both among the centers and with the reference laboratory.Results: When the concordance of participating centers and the reference laboratory was evaluated regarding negative (0-1+), equivocal 2(+) and positive 3(+) classification of HER2 immunostaining, the highest concordance was found in Center-A, and the lowest in Center-C (Kendall's tau-b concordance coefficient 0.911 and 0.724, respectively). The concordance of the centers with reference laboratory was 80.0% both in equivocal and positive samples, while it increased up to 91.8% in negative samples.Conclusions: This study showed that in general there is sufficiently good agreement between the reference laboratory and the participating centers for immunohistochemical HER2 assessment.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T11:24:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0ce1214ddc9f43f8aa5dbf4aada0330f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2587-0831
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T11:24:05Z
publishDate 2018-07-01
publisher Galenos Publishing House
record_format Article
series European Journal of Breast Health
spelling doaj.art-0ce1214ddc9f43f8aa5dbf4aada0330f2023-02-15T16:18:30ZengGalenos Publishing HouseEuropean Journal of Breast Health2587-08312018-07-0114316016510.5152/ejbh.2018.396113049054Immunohistochemical HER2 Status Evaluation in Breast Cancer Pathology Samples: A Multicenter, Parallel-Design Concordance StudyTülay Canda0Ekrem Yavuz1Necmettin Özdemir2Sennur İlvan3Serpil Sak Dizbay4Merih Güray Durak5Sıtkı Tuzlalı6Osman Zekioğlu7Atakan Demir8Handan Onur9Kasım Üstündağ10Burçe Göktaş11 Department of Pathology, Dokuz Eylül University School of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey Department of Pathology, İstanbul University, İstanbul School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey Department of Pathology, Ege University School of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey Department of Pathology, İstanbul University, Cerrahpaşa School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey Department of Pathology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey Department of Pathology, Dokuz Eylül University School of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey Department of Pathology, İstanbul University, İstanbul School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey Department of Pathology, Ege University School of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey Department of Pathology, İstanbul University, Cerrahpaşa School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey Department of Pathology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey Clinical Research, Roche Preparations San. Inc., İstanbul, Turkey Clinical Research, Roche Preparations San. Inc., İstanbul, Turkey Objective: As patients with increased human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) overexpression are more likely to benefit from trastuzumab treatment, the accuracy of HER2 receptor status in breast cancer patients is significant for appropriate disease management. However, this assessment is not harmonized and results may be highly variable between centers. The aim of this study was to investigate the degree of interlaboratory variability in the results of HER2 expression reported by 5 participating centers and to assess the concordance between these centers and a reference laboratory.Materials and Methods: A total of 30 breast cancer samples were tested and scored for HER2 expression using immunohistochemical method in 5 centers from Turkey and in a reference laboratory from Netherlands (Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam). All the participating centers had an experience of more than 10 years regarding the HER2 testing. The results were compared both among the centers and with the reference laboratory.Results: When the concordance of participating centers and the reference laboratory was evaluated regarding negative (0-1+), equivocal 2(+) and positive 3(+) classification of HER2 immunostaining, the highest concordance was found in Center-A, and the lowest in Center-C (Kendall's tau-b concordance coefficient 0.911 and 0.724, respectively). The concordance of the centers with reference laboratory was 80.0% both in equivocal and positive samples, while it increased up to 91.8% in negative samples.Conclusions: This study showed that in general there is sufficiently good agreement between the reference laboratory and the participating centers for immunohistochemical HER2 assessment. http://www.eurjbreasthealth.com/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/mmunohistochemical-her2-status-evaluation-in-breas/42039 immunohistochemistrybreast cancerdiagnosisher2
spellingShingle Tülay Canda
Ekrem Yavuz
Necmettin Özdemir
Sennur İlvan
Serpil Sak Dizbay
Merih Güray Durak
Sıtkı Tuzlalı
Osman Zekioğlu
Atakan Demir
Handan Onur
Kasım Üstündağ
Burçe Göktaş
Immunohistochemical HER2 Status Evaluation in Breast Cancer Pathology Samples: A Multicenter, Parallel-Design Concordance Study
European Journal of Breast Health
immunohistochemistry
breast cancer
diagnosis
her2
title Immunohistochemical HER2 Status Evaluation in Breast Cancer Pathology Samples: A Multicenter, Parallel-Design Concordance Study
title_full Immunohistochemical HER2 Status Evaluation in Breast Cancer Pathology Samples: A Multicenter, Parallel-Design Concordance Study
title_fullStr Immunohistochemical HER2 Status Evaluation in Breast Cancer Pathology Samples: A Multicenter, Parallel-Design Concordance Study
title_full_unstemmed Immunohistochemical HER2 Status Evaluation in Breast Cancer Pathology Samples: A Multicenter, Parallel-Design Concordance Study
title_short Immunohistochemical HER2 Status Evaluation in Breast Cancer Pathology Samples: A Multicenter, Parallel-Design Concordance Study
title_sort immunohistochemical her2 status evaluation in breast cancer pathology samples a multicenter parallel design concordance study
topic immunohistochemistry
breast cancer
diagnosis
her2
url http://www.eurjbreasthealth.com/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/mmunohistochemical-her2-status-evaluation-in-breas/42039
work_keys_str_mv AT tulaycanda immunohistochemicalher2statusevaluationinbreastcancerpathologysamplesamulticenterparalleldesignconcordancestudy
AT ekremyavuz immunohistochemicalher2statusevaluationinbreastcancerpathologysamplesamulticenterparalleldesignconcordancestudy
AT necmettinozdemir immunohistochemicalher2statusevaluationinbreastcancerpathologysamplesamulticenterparalleldesignconcordancestudy
AT sennurilvan immunohistochemicalher2statusevaluationinbreastcancerpathologysamplesamulticenterparalleldesignconcordancestudy
AT serpilsakdizbay immunohistochemicalher2statusevaluationinbreastcancerpathologysamplesamulticenterparalleldesignconcordancestudy
AT merihguraydurak immunohistochemicalher2statusevaluationinbreastcancerpathologysamplesamulticenterparalleldesignconcordancestudy
AT sıtkıtuzlalı immunohistochemicalher2statusevaluationinbreastcancerpathologysamplesamulticenterparalleldesignconcordancestudy
AT osmanzekioglu immunohistochemicalher2statusevaluationinbreastcancerpathologysamplesamulticenterparalleldesignconcordancestudy
AT atakandemir immunohistochemicalher2statusevaluationinbreastcancerpathologysamplesamulticenterparalleldesignconcordancestudy
AT handanonur immunohistochemicalher2statusevaluationinbreastcancerpathologysamplesamulticenterparalleldesignconcordancestudy
AT kasımustundag immunohistochemicalher2statusevaluationinbreastcancerpathologysamplesamulticenterparalleldesignconcordancestudy
AT burcegoktas immunohistochemicalher2statusevaluationinbreastcancerpathologysamplesamulticenterparalleldesignconcordancestudy