Three-dimensional evaluation of interradicular areas and cortical bone thickness for orthodontic miniscrew implant placement using cone-beam computed tomography

Background: Factors that influence anchorage of the orthodontic miniscrew implants are interradicular areas and cortical bone thickness. Aims and Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the three-dimensional interradicular areas and the buccal cortical bone thickness in Indian patients usi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Garadappagari Dharmadeep, Moode Kaladhar Naik, Yellampalli Muralidhar Reddy, Sreekanth Cheruluri, Kranthi Praveen Raj, Badepalli Reddeppa Reddy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2020-01-01
Series:Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2020;volume=12;issue=5;spage=99;epage=104;aulast=Dharmadeep
_version_ 1818514567900168192
author Garadappagari Dharmadeep
Moode Kaladhar Naik
Yellampalli Muralidhar Reddy
Sreekanth Cheruluri
Kranthi Praveen Raj
Badepalli Reddeppa Reddy
author_facet Garadappagari Dharmadeep
Moode Kaladhar Naik
Yellampalli Muralidhar Reddy
Sreekanth Cheruluri
Kranthi Praveen Raj
Badepalli Reddeppa Reddy
author_sort Garadappagari Dharmadeep
collection DOAJ
description Background: Factors that influence anchorage of the orthodontic miniscrew implants are interradicular areas and cortical bone thickness. Aims and Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the three-dimensional interradicular areas and the buccal cortical bone thickness in Indian patients using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images, and to find the suitable and safe sites for orthodontic miniscrew implant placement. Materials and Methods: CBCT images of 20 patients were divided into three planes as axial, coronal, and sagittal. Measurements, that is, mesiodistal distance and buccal cortical bone thickness were taken at five different heights from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) toward apical region. Results: In the maxilla, the safe sites for placing miniscrew implant were between the second premolar and first molar at 10-mm height, whereas in the mandible, the safe sites for placing miniscrew implant were between the first and second premolar at 6-, 8-, and 10-mm height, between the second premolar and first molar at 10-mm height, and between the first and second molar at 8- and 10-mm height. Conclusion: CBCT can be effectively used to evaluate interradicular areas and cortical bone thickness in predicting the safe and suitable sites for placing orthodontic miniscrew implants.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T00:17:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0cf62118601548668e22862b1dbdc257
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0975-7406
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T00:17:34Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
spelling doaj.art-0cf62118601548668e22862b1dbdc2572022-12-22T01:27:52ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences0975-74062020-01-011259910410.4103/jpbs.JPBS_36_20Three-dimensional evaluation of interradicular areas and cortical bone thickness for orthodontic miniscrew implant placement using cone-beam computed tomographyGaradappagari DharmadeepMoode Kaladhar NaikYellampalli Muralidhar ReddySreekanth CheruluriKranthi Praveen RajBadepalli Reddeppa ReddyBackground: Factors that influence anchorage of the orthodontic miniscrew implants are interradicular areas and cortical bone thickness. Aims and Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the three-dimensional interradicular areas and the buccal cortical bone thickness in Indian patients using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images, and to find the suitable and safe sites for orthodontic miniscrew implant placement. Materials and Methods: CBCT images of 20 patients were divided into three planes as axial, coronal, and sagittal. Measurements, that is, mesiodistal distance and buccal cortical bone thickness were taken at five different heights from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) toward apical region. Results: In the maxilla, the safe sites for placing miniscrew implant were between the second premolar and first molar at 10-mm height, whereas in the mandible, the safe sites for placing miniscrew implant were between the first and second premolar at 6-, 8-, and 10-mm height, between the second premolar and first molar at 10-mm height, and between the first and second molar at 8- and 10-mm height. Conclusion: CBCT can be effectively used to evaluate interradicular areas and cortical bone thickness in predicting the safe and suitable sites for placing orthodontic miniscrew implants.http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2020;volume=12;issue=5;spage=99;epage=104;aulast=Dharmadeepanchoragecone beam computed tomographycortical bone thicknessinterradicular areaorthodontic miniscrew implant
spellingShingle Garadappagari Dharmadeep
Moode Kaladhar Naik
Yellampalli Muralidhar Reddy
Sreekanth Cheruluri
Kranthi Praveen Raj
Badepalli Reddeppa Reddy
Three-dimensional evaluation of interradicular areas and cortical bone thickness for orthodontic miniscrew implant placement using cone-beam computed tomography
Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
anchorage
cone beam computed tomography
cortical bone thickness
interradicular area
orthodontic miniscrew implant
title Three-dimensional evaluation of interradicular areas and cortical bone thickness for orthodontic miniscrew implant placement using cone-beam computed tomography
title_full Three-dimensional evaluation of interradicular areas and cortical bone thickness for orthodontic miniscrew implant placement using cone-beam computed tomography
title_fullStr Three-dimensional evaluation of interradicular areas and cortical bone thickness for orthodontic miniscrew implant placement using cone-beam computed tomography
title_full_unstemmed Three-dimensional evaluation of interradicular areas and cortical bone thickness for orthodontic miniscrew implant placement using cone-beam computed tomography
title_short Three-dimensional evaluation of interradicular areas and cortical bone thickness for orthodontic miniscrew implant placement using cone-beam computed tomography
title_sort three dimensional evaluation of interradicular areas and cortical bone thickness for orthodontic miniscrew implant placement using cone beam computed tomography
topic anchorage
cone beam computed tomography
cortical bone thickness
interradicular area
orthodontic miniscrew implant
url http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2020;volume=12;issue=5;spage=99;epage=104;aulast=Dharmadeep
work_keys_str_mv AT garadappagaridharmadeep threedimensionalevaluationofinterradicularareasandcorticalbonethicknessfororthodonticminiscrewimplantplacementusingconebeamcomputedtomography
AT moodekaladharnaik threedimensionalevaluationofinterradicularareasandcorticalbonethicknessfororthodonticminiscrewimplantplacementusingconebeamcomputedtomography
AT yellampallimuralidharreddy threedimensionalevaluationofinterradicularareasandcorticalbonethicknessfororthodonticminiscrewimplantplacementusingconebeamcomputedtomography
AT sreekanthcheruluri threedimensionalevaluationofinterradicularareasandcorticalbonethicknessfororthodonticminiscrewimplantplacementusingconebeamcomputedtomography
AT kranthipraveenraj threedimensionalevaluationofinterradicularareasandcorticalbonethicknessfororthodonticminiscrewimplantplacementusingconebeamcomputedtomography
AT badepallireddeppareddy threedimensionalevaluationofinterradicularareasandcorticalbonethicknessfororthodonticminiscrewimplantplacementusingconebeamcomputedtomography