Three-dimensional evaluation of interradicular areas and cortical bone thickness for orthodontic miniscrew implant placement using cone-beam computed tomography
Background: Factors that influence anchorage of the orthodontic miniscrew implants are interradicular areas and cortical bone thickness. Aims and Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the three-dimensional interradicular areas and the buccal cortical bone thickness in Indian patients usi...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2020;volume=12;issue=5;spage=99;epage=104;aulast=Dharmadeep |
_version_ | 1818514567900168192 |
---|---|
author | Garadappagari Dharmadeep Moode Kaladhar Naik Yellampalli Muralidhar Reddy Sreekanth Cheruluri Kranthi Praveen Raj Badepalli Reddeppa Reddy |
author_facet | Garadappagari Dharmadeep Moode Kaladhar Naik Yellampalli Muralidhar Reddy Sreekanth Cheruluri Kranthi Praveen Raj Badepalli Reddeppa Reddy |
author_sort | Garadappagari Dharmadeep |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background: Factors that influence anchorage of the orthodontic miniscrew implants are interradicular areas and cortical bone thickness. Aims and Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the three-dimensional interradicular areas and the buccal cortical bone thickness in Indian patients using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images, and to find the suitable and safe sites for orthodontic miniscrew implant placement. Materials and Methods: CBCT images of 20 patients were divided into three planes as axial, coronal, and sagittal. Measurements, that is, mesiodistal distance and buccal cortical bone thickness were taken at five different heights from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) toward apical region. Results: In the maxilla, the safe sites for placing miniscrew implant were between the second premolar and first molar at 10-mm height, whereas in the mandible, the safe sites for placing miniscrew implant were between the first and second premolar at 6-, 8-, and 10-mm height, between the second premolar and first molar at 10-mm height, and between the first and second molar at 8- and 10-mm height. Conclusion: CBCT can be effectively used to evaluate interradicular areas and cortical bone thickness in predicting the safe and suitable sites for placing orthodontic miniscrew implants. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-11T00:17:34Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-0cf62118601548668e22862b1dbdc257 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0975-7406 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-11T00:17:34Z |
publishDate | 2020-01-01 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences |
spelling | doaj.art-0cf62118601548668e22862b1dbdc2572022-12-22T01:27:52ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences0975-74062020-01-011259910410.4103/jpbs.JPBS_36_20Three-dimensional evaluation of interradicular areas and cortical bone thickness for orthodontic miniscrew implant placement using cone-beam computed tomographyGaradappagari DharmadeepMoode Kaladhar NaikYellampalli Muralidhar ReddySreekanth CheruluriKranthi Praveen RajBadepalli Reddeppa ReddyBackground: Factors that influence anchorage of the orthodontic miniscrew implants are interradicular areas and cortical bone thickness. Aims and Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the three-dimensional interradicular areas and the buccal cortical bone thickness in Indian patients using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images, and to find the suitable and safe sites for orthodontic miniscrew implant placement. Materials and Methods: CBCT images of 20 patients were divided into three planes as axial, coronal, and sagittal. Measurements, that is, mesiodistal distance and buccal cortical bone thickness were taken at five different heights from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) toward apical region. Results: In the maxilla, the safe sites for placing miniscrew implant were between the second premolar and first molar at 10-mm height, whereas in the mandible, the safe sites for placing miniscrew implant were between the first and second premolar at 6-, 8-, and 10-mm height, between the second premolar and first molar at 10-mm height, and between the first and second molar at 8- and 10-mm height. Conclusion: CBCT can be effectively used to evaluate interradicular areas and cortical bone thickness in predicting the safe and suitable sites for placing orthodontic miniscrew implants.http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2020;volume=12;issue=5;spage=99;epage=104;aulast=Dharmadeepanchoragecone beam computed tomographycortical bone thicknessinterradicular areaorthodontic miniscrew implant |
spellingShingle | Garadappagari Dharmadeep Moode Kaladhar Naik Yellampalli Muralidhar Reddy Sreekanth Cheruluri Kranthi Praveen Raj Badepalli Reddeppa Reddy Three-dimensional evaluation of interradicular areas and cortical bone thickness for orthodontic miniscrew implant placement using cone-beam computed tomography Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences anchorage cone beam computed tomography cortical bone thickness interradicular area orthodontic miniscrew implant |
title | Three-dimensional evaluation of interradicular areas and cortical bone thickness for orthodontic miniscrew implant placement using cone-beam computed tomography |
title_full | Three-dimensional evaluation of interradicular areas and cortical bone thickness for orthodontic miniscrew implant placement using cone-beam computed tomography |
title_fullStr | Three-dimensional evaluation of interradicular areas and cortical bone thickness for orthodontic miniscrew implant placement using cone-beam computed tomography |
title_full_unstemmed | Three-dimensional evaluation of interradicular areas and cortical bone thickness for orthodontic miniscrew implant placement using cone-beam computed tomography |
title_short | Three-dimensional evaluation of interradicular areas and cortical bone thickness for orthodontic miniscrew implant placement using cone-beam computed tomography |
title_sort | three dimensional evaluation of interradicular areas and cortical bone thickness for orthodontic miniscrew implant placement using cone beam computed tomography |
topic | anchorage cone beam computed tomography cortical bone thickness interradicular area orthodontic miniscrew implant |
url | http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2020;volume=12;issue=5;spage=99;epage=104;aulast=Dharmadeep |
work_keys_str_mv | AT garadappagaridharmadeep threedimensionalevaluationofinterradicularareasandcorticalbonethicknessfororthodonticminiscrewimplantplacementusingconebeamcomputedtomography AT moodekaladharnaik threedimensionalevaluationofinterradicularareasandcorticalbonethicknessfororthodonticminiscrewimplantplacementusingconebeamcomputedtomography AT yellampallimuralidharreddy threedimensionalevaluationofinterradicularareasandcorticalbonethicknessfororthodonticminiscrewimplantplacementusingconebeamcomputedtomography AT sreekanthcheruluri threedimensionalevaluationofinterradicularareasandcorticalbonethicknessfororthodonticminiscrewimplantplacementusingconebeamcomputedtomography AT kranthipraveenraj threedimensionalevaluationofinterradicularareasandcorticalbonethicknessfororthodonticminiscrewimplantplacementusingconebeamcomputedtomography AT badepallireddeppareddy threedimensionalevaluationofinterradicularareasandcorticalbonethicknessfororthodonticminiscrewimplantplacementusingconebeamcomputedtomography |