Urethral duplication associated with complex chordee: a narrative review of literature and report of a case

Abstract Background Urethral duplication (UD) is reportedly rare. It is rarer in females. Knowledge on this anomaly comes from isolated report of cases. The aim of this review is to summarize information available on this anomaly thereby revealing gaps in knowledge, and to appropriately situate a re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ikenna I. Nnabugwu, Wilson C. Onoh, Francis I. Ukekwe, Ekeoma O. Nwosu, Chukwunonso A. Iwenofu, Ikenna N. Anakebe, Chinwe A. Nnabugwu, Augustine C. Onuh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2022-09-01
Series:African Journal of Urology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-022-00311-9
_version_ 1811297472088113152
author Ikenna I. Nnabugwu
Wilson C. Onoh
Francis I. Ukekwe
Ekeoma O. Nwosu
Chukwunonso A. Iwenofu
Ikenna N. Anakebe
Chinwe A. Nnabugwu
Augustine C. Onuh
author_facet Ikenna I. Nnabugwu
Wilson C. Onoh
Francis I. Ukekwe
Ekeoma O. Nwosu
Chukwunonso A. Iwenofu
Ikenna N. Anakebe
Chinwe A. Nnabugwu
Augustine C. Onuh
author_sort Ikenna I. Nnabugwu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Urethral duplication (UD) is reportedly rare. It is rarer in females. Knowledge on this anomaly comes from isolated report of cases. The aim of this review is to summarize information available on this anomaly thereby revealing gaps in knowledge, and to appropriately situate a recently managed case. Methods Publications on UD in English language from 2001 to 2021 were searched for in the literature. Of importance were age at presentation, class of UD, nature of associated penile deformity and other structural anomalies. Available information was used to synthesize opinions after descriptive analyses using SPSS® version 21 (IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA). In addition, a recently managed case of UD was reported and appropriately situated in the discourse. Result In all, 115 articles met the inclusion criteria. Majority (75.7%) were individual case reports, while the rest were retrospective review of case series. These provided a total of 269 reported cases. Of this lot, 38 cases were excluded because they either had no Effmann’s class or were not described well enough for an Effmann’s class to be assigned. Ultimately, 231 cases formed the basis for this review. Male to female ratio was 12:1. Types III and IIB had more females. Types IIA 2 (26.0%), IIA 2 “Y” (26.4%) and IA (22.5%) were frequently reported. About 61.8% males and 68.4% females had no associated defects. Isolated dorsal chordee was prevalent (7.1%), especially among type IA (16.7%) UD. Reported in 10.4%, vesicoureteric reflux may not be attributable always to high pressure voiding. A boy who presented at the age of 18 years with Effmann type IA UD and an associated complex chordee of the penile shaft was reported. The complex nature of the chordee adds to the challenge of explaining associated penile defects in UD. Conclusion UD is rare, but reported from all parts of the globe. There are a number of associated defects involving the external genitalia and other organs reported in UD in the male. The mechanisms of these defects are yet to be fully understood.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T06:04:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0d03ef010c2448868fabc3e27c0f4640
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1110-5704
1961-9987
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T06:04:48Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series African Journal of Urology
spelling doaj.art-0d03ef010c2448868fabc3e27c0f46402022-12-22T02:59:18ZengSpringerOpenAfrican Journal of Urology1110-57041961-99872022-09-012811610.1186/s12301-022-00311-9Urethral duplication associated with complex chordee: a narrative review of literature and report of a caseIkenna I. Nnabugwu0Wilson C. Onoh1Francis I. Ukekwe2Ekeoma O. Nwosu3Chukwunonso A. Iwenofu4Ikenna N. Anakebe5Chinwe A. Nnabugwu6Augustine C. Onuh7Urology Units, Faculty of Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria Ituku-OzallaUrology Units, Faculty of Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria Ituku-OzallaPathology Units, Faculty of Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria Ituku-OzallaUrology Units, Faculty of Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria Ituku-OzallaUrology Units, Faculty of Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria Ituku-OzallaUrology Units, Faculty of Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria Ituku-OzallaDepartment of Health Administration and Management, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria Ituku-OzallaRadiology Units, Faculty of Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria Ituku-OzallaAbstract Background Urethral duplication (UD) is reportedly rare. It is rarer in females. Knowledge on this anomaly comes from isolated report of cases. The aim of this review is to summarize information available on this anomaly thereby revealing gaps in knowledge, and to appropriately situate a recently managed case. Methods Publications on UD in English language from 2001 to 2021 were searched for in the literature. Of importance were age at presentation, class of UD, nature of associated penile deformity and other structural anomalies. Available information was used to synthesize opinions after descriptive analyses using SPSS® version 21 (IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA). In addition, a recently managed case of UD was reported and appropriately situated in the discourse. Result In all, 115 articles met the inclusion criteria. Majority (75.7%) were individual case reports, while the rest were retrospective review of case series. These provided a total of 269 reported cases. Of this lot, 38 cases were excluded because they either had no Effmann’s class or were not described well enough for an Effmann’s class to be assigned. Ultimately, 231 cases formed the basis for this review. Male to female ratio was 12:1. Types III and IIB had more females. Types IIA 2 (26.0%), IIA 2 “Y” (26.4%) and IA (22.5%) were frequently reported. About 61.8% males and 68.4% females had no associated defects. Isolated dorsal chordee was prevalent (7.1%), especially among type IA (16.7%) UD. Reported in 10.4%, vesicoureteric reflux may not be attributable always to high pressure voiding. A boy who presented at the age of 18 years with Effmann type IA UD and an associated complex chordee of the penile shaft was reported. The complex nature of the chordee adds to the challenge of explaining associated penile defects in UD. Conclusion UD is rare, but reported from all parts of the globe. There are a number of associated defects involving the external genitalia and other organs reported in UD in the male. The mechanisms of these defects are yet to be fully understood.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-022-00311-9Complex chordeeUrethral duplicationEffmann classificationUrethrographyUrethral excisionCase report
spellingShingle Ikenna I. Nnabugwu
Wilson C. Onoh
Francis I. Ukekwe
Ekeoma O. Nwosu
Chukwunonso A. Iwenofu
Ikenna N. Anakebe
Chinwe A. Nnabugwu
Augustine C. Onuh
Urethral duplication associated with complex chordee: a narrative review of literature and report of a case
African Journal of Urology
Complex chordee
Urethral duplication
Effmann classification
Urethrography
Urethral excision
Case report
title Urethral duplication associated with complex chordee: a narrative review of literature and report of a case
title_full Urethral duplication associated with complex chordee: a narrative review of literature and report of a case
title_fullStr Urethral duplication associated with complex chordee: a narrative review of literature and report of a case
title_full_unstemmed Urethral duplication associated with complex chordee: a narrative review of literature and report of a case
title_short Urethral duplication associated with complex chordee: a narrative review of literature and report of a case
title_sort urethral duplication associated with complex chordee a narrative review of literature and report of a case
topic Complex chordee
Urethral duplication
Effmann classification
Urethrography
Urethral excision
Case report
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-022-00311-9
work_keys_str_mv AT ikennainnabugwu urethralduplicationassociatedwithcomplexchordeeanarrativereviewofliteratureandreportofacase
AT wilsonconoh urethralduplicationassociatedwithcomplexchordeeanarrativereviewofliteratureandreportofacase
AT francisiukekwe urethralduplicationassociatedwithcomplexchordeeanarrativereviewofliteratureandreportofacase
AT ekeomaonwosu urethralduplicationassociatedwithcomplexchordeeanarrativereviewofliteratureandreportofacase
AT chukwunonsoaiwenofu urethralduplicationassociatedwithcomplexchordeeanarrativereviewofliteratureandreportofacase
AT ikennananakebe urethralduplicationassociatedwithcomplexchordeeanarrativereviewofliteratureandreportofacase
AT chinweannabugwu urethralduplicationassociatedwithcomplexchordeeanarrativereviewofliteratureandreportofacase
AT augustineconuh urethralduplicationassociatedwithcomplexchordeeanarrativereviewofliteratureandreportofacase