Natural statistics support a rational account of confidence biases

Abstract Previous work has sought to understand decision confidence as a prediction of the probability that a decision will be correct, leading to debate over whether these predictions are optimal, and whether they rely on the same decision variable as decisions themselves. This work has generally r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Taylor W. Webb, Kiyofumi Miyoshi, Tsz Yan So, Sivananda Rajananda, Hakwan Lau
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2023-07-01
Series:Nature Communications
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39737-2
_version_ 1797784535114448896
author Taylor W. Webb
Kiyofumi Miyoshi
Tsz Yan So
Sivananda Rajananda
Hakwan Lau
author_facet Taylor W. Webb
Kiyofumi Miyoshi
Tsz Yan So
Sivananda Rajananda
Hakwan Lau
author_sort Taylor W. Webb
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Previous work has sought to understand decision confidence as a prediction of the probability that a decision will be correct, leading to debate over whether these predictions are optimal, and whether they rely on the same decision variable as decisions themselves. This work has generally relied on idealized, low-dimensional models, necessitating strong assumptions about the representations over which confidence is computed. To address this, we used deep neural networks to develop a model of decision confidence that operates directly over high-dimensional, naturalistic stimuli. The model accounts for a number of puzzling dissociations between decisions and confidence, reveals a rational explanation of these dissociations in terms of optimization for the statistics of sensory inputs, and makes the surprising prediction that, despite these dissociations, decisions and confidence depend on a common decision variable.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T00:41:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0d0ce14b85ec49c6b10e8f5781e6a146
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2041-1723
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T00:41:17Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Nature Communications
spelling doaj.art-0d0ce14b85ec49c6b10e8f5781e6a1462023-07-09T11:17:35ZengNature PortfolioNature Communications2041-17232023-07-0114111810.1038/s41467-023-39737-2Natural statistics support a rational account of confidence biasesTaylor W. Webb0Kiyofumi Miyoshi1Tsz Yan So2Sivananda Rajananda3Hakwan Lau4University of CaliforniaKyoto UniversityThe University of Hong KongHarvard UniversityLaboratory for Consciousness, RIKEN Center for Brain ScienceAbstract Previous work has sought to understand decision confidence as a prediction of the probability that a decision will be correct, leading to debate over whether these predictions are optimal, and whether they rely on the same decision variable as decisions themselves. This work has generally relied on idealized, low-dimensional models, necessitating strong assumptions about the representations over which confidence is computed. To address this, we used deep neural networks to develop a model of decision confidence that operates directly over high-dimensional, naturalistic stimuli. The model accounts for a number of puzzling dissociations between decisions and confidence, reveals a rational explanation of these dissociations in terms of optimization for the statistics of sensory inputs, and makes the surprising prediction that, despite these dissociations, decisions and confidence depend on a common decision variable.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39737-2
spellingShingle Taylor W. Webb
Kiyofumi Miyoshi
Tsz Yan So
Sivananda Rajananda
Hakwan Lau
Natural statistics support a rational account of confidence biases
Nature Communications
title Natural statistics support a rational account of confidence biases
title_full Natural statistics support a rational account of confidence biases
title_fullStr Natural statistics support a rational account of confidence biases
title_full_unstemmed Natural statistics support a rational account of confidence biases
title_short Natural statistics support a rational account of confidence biases
title_sort natural statistics support a rational account of confidence biases
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39737-2
work_keys_str_mv AT taylorwwebb naturalstatisticssupportarationalaccountofconfidencebiases
AT kiyofumimiyoshi naturalstatisticssupportarationalaccountofconfidencebiases
AT tszyanso naturalstatisticssupportarationalaccountofconfidencebiases
AT sivanandarajananda naturalstatisticssupportarationalaccountofconfidencebiases
AT hakwanlau naturalstatisticssupportarationalaccountofconfidencebiases