Accuracy and self-validation of automated bone age determination
Abstract The BoneXpert method for automated determination of bone age from hand X-rays was introduced in 2009 and is currently running in over 200 hospitals. The aim of this work is to present version 3 of the method and validate its accuracy and self-validation mechanism that automatically rejects...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2022-04-01
|
| Series: | Scientific Reports |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10292-y |
| _version_ | 1818274095426437120 |
|---|---|
| author | D. D. Martin A. D. Calder M. B. Ranke G. Binder H. H. Thodberg |
| author_facet | D. D. Martin A. D. Calder M. B. Ranke G. Binder H. H. Thodberg |
| author_sort | D. D. Martin |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract The BoneXpert method for automated determination of bone age from hand X-rays was introduced in 2009 and is currently running in over 200 hospitals. The aim of this work is to present version 3 of the method and validate its accuracy and self-validation mechanism that automatically rejects an image if it is at risk of being analysed incorrectly. The training set included 14,036 images from the 2017 Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) Bone Age Challenge, 1642 images of normal Dutch and Californian children, and 8250 images from Tübingen from patients with Short Stature, Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia and Precocious Puberty. The study resulted in a cross-validated root mean square (RMS) error in the Tübingen images of 0.62 y, compared to 0.72 y in the previous version. The RMS error on the RSNA test set of 200 images was 0.45 y relative to the average of six manual ratings. The self-validation mechanism rejected 0.4% of the RSNA images. 121 outliers among the self-validated images of the Tübingen study were rerated, resulting in 6 cases where BoneXpert deviated more than 1.5 years from the average of the three re-ratings, compared to 72 such cases for the original manual ratings. The accuracy of BoneXpert is clearly better than the accuracy of a single manual rating. The self-validation mechanism rejected very few images, typically with abnormal anatomy, and among the accepted images, there were 12 times fewer severe bone age errors than in manual ratings, suggesting that BoneXpert could be safer than manual rating. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-12T22:08:24Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-0d1299e747ad494cbd8d9c9adc2d5800 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2045-2322 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-12T22:08:24Z |
| publishDate | 2022-04-01 |
| publisher | Nature Portfolio |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Scientific Reports |
| spelling | doaj.art-0d1299e747ad494cbd8d9c9adc2d58002022-12-22T00:10:18ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222022-04-0112111210.1038/s41598-022-10292-yAccuracy and self-validation of automated bone age determinationD. D. Martin0A. D. Calder1M. B. Ranke2G. Binder3H. H. Thodberg4University of Witten/HerdeckeGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation TrustPediatric Endocrinology, University Children’s HospitalPediatric Endocrinology, University Children’s HospitalVisianaAbstract The BoneXpert method for automated determination of bone age from hand X-rays was introduced in 2009 and is currently running in over 200 hospitals. The aim of this work is to present version 3 of the method and validate its accuracy and self-validation mechanism that automatically rejects an image if it is at risk of being analysed incorrectly. The training set included 14,036 images from the 2017 Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) Bone Age Challenge, 1642 images of normal Dutch and Californian children, and 8250 images from Tübingen from patients with Short Stature, Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia and Precocious Puberty. The study resulted in a cross-validated root mean square (RMS) error in the Tübingen images of 0.62 y, compared to 0.72 y in the previous version. The RMS error on the RSNA test set of 200 images was 0.45 y relative to the average of six manual ratings. The self-validation mechanism rejected 0.4% of the RSNA images. 121 outliers among the self-validated images of the Tübingen study were rerated, resulting in 6 cases where BoneXpert deviated more than 1.5 years from the average of the three re-ratings, compared to 72 such cases for the original manual ratings. The accuracy of BoneXpert is clearly better than the accuracy of a single manual rating. The self-validation mechanism rejected very few images, typically with abnormal anatomy, and among the accepted images, there were 12 times fewer severe bone age errors than in manual ratings, suggesting that BoneXpert could be safer than manual rating.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10292-y |
| spellingShingle | D. D. Martin A. D. Calder M. B. Ranke G. Binder H. H. Thodberg Accuracy and self-validation of automated bone age determination Scientific Reports |
| title | Accuracy and self-validation of automated bone age determination |
| title_full | Accuracy and self-validation of automated bone age determination |
| title_fullStr | Accuracy and self-validation of automated bone age determination |
| title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy and self-validation of automated bone age determination |
| title_short | Accuracy and self-validation of automated bone age determination |
| title_sort | accuracy and self validation of automated bone age determination |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10292-y |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ddmartin accuracyandselfvalidationofautomatedboneagedetermination AT adcalder accuracyandselfvalidationofautomatedboneagedetermination AT mbranke accuracyandselfvalidationofautomatedboneagedetermination AT gbinder accuracyandselfvalidationofautomatedboneagedetermination AT hhthodberg accuracyandselfvalidationofautomatedboneagedetermination |