Risk of Agricultural Practices and Habitat Change to Farmland Birds

Many common bird species have declined as a result of agricultural intensification and this could be mitigated by organic farming. We paired sites for habitat and geographical location on organic and nonorganic farms in Ontario, Canada to test a priori predictions of effects on birds overall, 9 guil...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David Anthony. Kirk, Kathryn E. Lindsay, Rodney W. Brook
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Resilience Alliance 2011-06-01
Series:Avian Conservation and Ecology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ace-eco.org/vol6/iss1/art5/
_version_ 1797971941178474496
author David Anthony. Kirk
Kathryn E. Lindsay
Rodney W. Brook
author_facet David Anthony. Kirk
Kathryn E. Lindsay
Rodney W. Brook
author_sort David Anthony. Kirk
collection DOAJ
description Many common bird species have declined as a result of agricultural intensification and this could be mitigated by organic farming. We paired sites for habitat and geographical location on organic and nonorganic farms in Ontario, Canada to test a priori predictions of effects on birds overall, 9 guilds and 22 species in relation to candidate models for farming practices (13 variables), local habitat features (12 variables), or habitat features that influence susceptibility to predation. We found that: (1) Overall bird abundance, but not richness, was significantly (p < 0.05) higher on organic sites (mean 43.1 individuals per site) than nonorganic sites (35.8 individuals per site). Significantly more species of birds were observed for five guilds, including primary grassland birds, on organic vs. nonorganic sites. No guild had higher richness or abundance on nonorganic farms; (2) Farming practice models were the best (Î"AIC < 4) for abundance of birds overall, primary grassland bird richness, sallier aerial insectivore richness and abundance, and abundance of ground nesters; (3) Habitat models were the best for overall richness, Neotropical migrant abundance, richness and abundance of Ontario-USA-Mexico (short-distance) migrants and resident richness; (4) Predation models were the best for richness of secondary grassland birds and ground feeders; (5) A combination of variables from the model types were best for richness or abundance overall, 13 of 18 guilds (richness and abundance) and 16 of 22 species analyzed. Five of 10 farming practice variables (including herbicide use, organic farm type) and 9 of 13 habitat variables (including hedgerow length, proportion of hay) were significant in best models. Risk modeling indicated that herbicide use could decrease primary grassland birds by one species (35% decline from 3.4 to 2.3 species) per site. Organic farming could benefit species of conservation concern by 49% (an increase from 7.6 to 11.4 grassland birds). An addition of 63 m of hedgerow could increase abundance and richness of short distance migrants by 50% (3.0 to 4.8 and 1.3 to 2.0, respectively). Increasing the proportion of hay on nonorganic farms to 50% could increase abundance of primary grassland bird by 40% (6.7 to 9.4). Our results provide support for alternative farmland designs and agricultural management systems that could enhance select bird species in farmland.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T03:40:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0d205e6c09944b20983fb7ee236f06b0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1712-6568
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T03:40:38Z
publishDate 2011-06-01
publisher Resilience Alliance
record_format Article
series Avian Conservation and Ecology
spelling doaj.art-0d205e6c09944b20983fb7ee236f06b02023-01-02T03:42:36ZengResilience AllianceAvian Conservation and Ecology1712-65682011-06-0161510.5751/ACE-00446-060105446Risk of Agricultural Practices and Habitat Change to Farmland BirdsDavid Anthony. Kirk0Kathryn E. Lindsay1Rodney W. Brook2Aquila Conservation & Environment ConsultingEnvironment CanadaOntario Ministry of Natural ResourcesMany common bird species have declined as a result of agricultural intensification and this could be mitigated by organic farming. We paired sites for habitat and geographical location on organic and nonorganic farms in Ontario, Canada to test a priori predictions of effects on birds overall, 9 guilds and 22 species in relation to candidate models for farming practices (13 variables), local habitat features (12 variables), or habitat features that influence susceptibility to predation. We found that: (1) Overall bird abundance, but not richness, was significantly (p < 0.05) higher on organic sites (mean 43.1 individuals per site) than nonorganic sites (35.8 individuals per site). Significantly more species of birds were observed for five guilds, including primary grassland birds, on organic vs. nonorganic sites. No guild had higher richness or abundance on nonorganic farms; (2) Farming practice models were the best (Î"AIC < 4) for abundance of birds overall, primary grassland bird richness, sallier aerial insectivore richness and abundance, and abundance of ground nesters; (3) Habitat models were the best for overall richness, Neotropical migrant abundance, richness and abundance of Ontario-USA-Mexico (short-distance) migrants and resident richness; (4) Predation models were the best for richness of secondary grassland birds and ground feeders; (5) A combination of variables from the model types were best for richness or abundance overall, 13 of 18 guilds (richness and abundance) and 16 of 22 species analyzed. Five of 10 farming practice variables (including herbicide use, organic farm type) and 9 of 13 habitat variables (including hedgerow length, proportion of hay) were significant in best models. Risk modeling indicated that herbicide use could decrease primary grassland birds by one species (35% decline from 3.4 to 2.3 species) per site. Organic farming could benefit species of conservation concern by 49% (an increase from 7.6 to 11.4 grassland birds). An addition of 63 m of hedgerow could increase abundance and richness of short distance migrants by 50% (3.0 to 4.8 and 1.3 to 2.0, respectively). Increasing the proportion of hay on nonorganic farms to 50% could increase abundance of primary grassland bird by 40% (6.7 to 9.4). Our results provide support for alternative farmland designs and agricultural management systems that could enhance select bird species in farmland.http://www.ace-eco.org/vol6/iss1/art5/agricultural landscapesbirdsfarming practiceshabitatinformation theoretic approachrisk modeling
spellingShingle David Anthony. Kirk
Kathryn E. Lindsay
Rodney W. Brook
Risk of Agricultural Practices and Habitat Change to Farmland Birds
Avian Conservation and Ecology
agricultural landscapes
birds
farming practices
habitat
information theoretic approach
risk modeling
title Risk of Agricultural Practices and Habitat Change to Farmland Birds
title_full Risk of Agricultural Practices and Habitat Change to Farmland Birds
title_fullStr Risk of Agricultural Practices and Habitat Change to Farmland Birds
title_full_unstemmed Risk of Agricultural Practices and Habitat Change to Farmland Birds
title_short Risk of Agricultural Practices and Habitat Change to Farmland Birds
title_sort risk of agricultural practices and habitat change to farmland birds
topic agricultural landscapes
birds
farming practices
habitat
information theoretic approach
risk modeling
url http://www.ace-eco.org/vol6/iss1/art5/
work_keys_str_mv AT davidanthonykirk riskofagriculturalpracticesandhabitatchangetofarmlandbirds
AT kathrynelindsay riskofagriculturalpracticesandhabitatchangetofarmlandbirds
AT rodneywbrook riskofagriculturalpracticesandhabitatchangetofarmlandbirds