Comparison of the Hemocompatibility of an Axial and a Centrifugal Left Ventricular Assist Device in an In Vitro Test Circuit

Background: Hemocompatibility of left ventricular assist devices is essential for preventing adverse events. In this study, we compared the hemocompatibility of an axial-flow (Sputnik) to a centrifugal-flow (HeartMate 3) pump. Methods: Both pumps were integrated into identical in vitro test circuits...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Patrick Borchers, Patrick Winnersbach, Sandra Kraemer, Christian Beckers, Eva Miriam Buhl, Steffen Leonhardt, Rolf Rossaint, Marian Walter, Thomas Breuer, Christian Bleilevens
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-06-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/12/3431
_version_ 1797486003729989632
author Patrick Borchers
Patrick Winnersbach
Sandra Kraemer
Christian Beckers
Eva Miriam Buhl
Steffen Leonhardt
Rolf Rossaint
Marian Walter
Thomas Breuer
Christian Bleilevens
author_facet Patrick Borchers
Patrick Winnersbach
Sandra Kraemer
Christian Beckers
Eva Miriam Buhl
Steffen Leonhardt
Rolf Rossaint
Marian Walter
Thomas Breuer
Christian Bleilevens
author_sort Patrick Borchers
collection DOAJ
description Background: Hemocompatibility of left ventricular assist devices is essential for preventing adverse events. In this study, we compared the hemocompatibility of an axial-flow (Sputnik) to a centrifugal-flow (HeartMate 3) pump. Methods: Both pumps were integrated into identical in vitro test circuits, each filled with 75 mL heparinized human blood of the same donor. During each experiment (n = 7), the pumps were operated with equal flow for six hours. Blood sampling and analysis were performed on a regular schedule. The analytes were indicators of hemolysis, coagulation activation, platelet count and activation, as well as extracellular vesicles. Results: Sputnik induced higher hemolysis compared to the HeartMate 3 after 360 min. Furthermore, platelet activation was higher for Sputnik after 120 min onward. In the HeartMate 3 circuit, the platelet count was reduced within the first hour. Furthermore, Sputnik triggered a more pronounced increase in extracellular vesicles, a potential trigger for adverse events in left ventricular assist device application. Activation of coagulation showed a time-dependent increase, with no differences between both groups. Conclusions: This experimental study confirms the hypothesis that axial-flow pumps may induce stronger hemolysis compared to centrifugal pumps, coming along with larger amounts of circulating extracellular vesicles and a stronger PLT activation.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T23:26:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0d286ba855e6465182beee582f25b77c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T23:26:58Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-0d286ba855e6465182beee582f25b77c2023-11-23T17:15:55ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832022-06-011112343110.3390/jcm11123431Comparison of the Hemocompatibility of an Axial and a Centrifugal Left Ventricular Assist Device in an In Vitro Test CircuitPatrick Borchers0Patrick Winnersbach1Sandra Kraemer2Christian Beckers3Eva Miriam Buhl4Steffen Leonhardt5Rolf Rossaint6Marian Walter7Thomas Breuer8Christian Bleilevens9Medical Information Technology, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstraße 20, 52074 Aachen, GermanyDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074 Aachen, GermanyDepartment of Intensive Care and Intermediate Care, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074 Aachen, GermanyDepartment of Intensive Care and Intermediate Care, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074 Aachen, GermanyInstitute of Pathology, Electron Microscopy Facility, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074 Aachen, GermanyMedical Information Technology, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstraße 20, 52074 Aachen, GermanyDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074 Aachen, GermanyMedical Information Technology, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstraße 20, 52074 Aachen, GermanyDepartment of Intensive Care and Intermediate Care, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074 Aachen, GermanyDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074 Aachen, GermanyBackground: Hemocompatibility of left ventricular assist devices is essential for preventing adverse events. In this study, we compared the hemocompatibility of an axial-flow (Sputnik) to a centrifugal-flow (HeartMate 3) pump. Methods: Both pumps were integrated into identical in vitro test circuits, each filled with 75 mL heparinized human blood of the same donor. During each experiment (n = 7), the pumps were operated with equal flow for six hours. Blood sampling and analysis were performed on a regular schedule. The analytes were indicators of hemolysis, coagulation activation, platelet count and activation, as well as extracellular vesicles. Results: Sputnik induced higher hemolysis compared to the HeartMate 3 after 360 min. Furthermore, platelet activation was higher for Sputnik after 120 min onward. In the HeartMate 3 circuit, the platelet count was reduced within the first hour. Furthermore, Sputnik triggered a more pronounced increase in extracellular vesicles, a potential trigger for adverse events in left ventricular assist device application. Activation of coagulation showed a time-dependent increase, with no differences between both groups. Conclusions: This experimental study confirms the hypothesis that axial-flow pumps may induce stronger hemolysis compared to centrifugal pumps, coming along with larger amounts of circulating extracellular vesicles and a stronger PLT activation.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/12/3431left ventricular assist devicein vitro test circuitSputnikHeartMate 3hemocompatibilityhemolysis
spellingShingle Patrick Borchers
Patrick Winnersbach
Sandra Kraemer
Christian Beckers
Eva Miriam Buhl
Steffen Leonhardt
Rolf Rossaint
Marian Walter
Thomas Breuer
Christian Bleilevens
Comparison of the Hemocompatibility of an Axial and a Centrifugal Left Ventricular Assist Device in an In Vitro Test Circuit
Journal of Clinical Medicine
left ventricular assist device
in vitro test circuit
Sputnik
HeartMate 3
hemocompatibility
hemolysis
title Comparison of the Hemocompatibility of an Axial and a Centrifugal Left Ventricular Assist Device in an In Vitro Test Circuit
title_full Comparison of the Hemocompatibility of an Axial and a Centrifugal Left Ventricular Assist Device in an In Vitro Test Circuit
title_fullStr Comparison of the Hemocompatibility of an Axial and a Centrifugal Left Ventricular Assist Device in an In Vitro Test Circuit
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Hemocompatibility of an Axial and a Centrifugal Left Ventricular Assist Device in an In Vitro Test Circuit
title_short Comparison of the Hemocompatibility of an Axial and a Centrifugal Left Ventricular Assist Device in an In Vitro Test Circuit
title_sort comparison of the hemocompatibility of an axial and a centrifugal left ventricular assist device in an in vitro test circuit
topic left ventricular assist device
in vitro test circuit
Sputnik
HeartMate 3
hemocompatibility
hemolysis
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/12/3431
work_keys_str_mv AT patrickborchers comparisonofthehemocompatibilityofanaxialandacentrifugalleftventricularassistdeviceinaninvitrotestcircuit
AT patrickwinnersbach comparisonofthehemocompatibilityofanaxialandacentrifugalleftventricularassistdeviceinaninvitrotestcircuit
AT sandrakraemer comparisonofthehemocompatibilityofanaxialandacentrifugalleftventricularassistdeviceinaninvitrotestcircuit
AT christianbeckers comparisonofthehemocompatibilityofanaxialandacentrifugalleftventricularassistdeviceinaninvitrotestcircuit
AT evamiriambuhl comparisonofthehemocompatibilityofanaxialandacentrifugalleftventricularassistdeviceinaninvitrotestcircuit
AT steffenleonhardt comparisonofthehemocompatibilityofanaxialandacentrifugalleftventricularassistdeviceinaninvitrotestcircuit
AT rolfrossaint comparisonofthehemocompatibilityofanaxialandacentrifugalleftventricularassistdeviceinaninvitrotestcircuit
AT marianwalter comparisonofthehemocompatibilityofanaxialandacentrifugalleftventricularassistdeviceinaninvitrotestcircuit
AT thomasbreuer comparisonofthehemocompatibilityofanaxialandacentrifugalleftventricularassistdeviceinaninvitrotestcircuit
AT christianbleilevens comparisonofthehemocompatibilityofanaxialandacentrifugalleftventricularassistdeviceinaninvitrotestcircuit