Long-Term Evaluation and Calibration of Low-Cost Particulate Matter (PM) Sensor

Low-cost light scattering particulate matter (PM) sensors have been widely researched and deployed in order to overcome the limitations of low spatio-temporal resolution of government-operated beta attenuation monitor (BAM). However, the accuracy of low-cost sensors has been questioned, thus impedin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hoochang Lee, Jiseock Kang, Sungjung Kim, Yunseok Im, Seungsung Yoo, Dongjun Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-06-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/13/3617
Description
Summary:Low-cost light scattering particulate matter (PM) sensors have been widely researched and deployed in order to overcome the limitations of low spatio-temporal resolution of government-operated beta attenuation monitor (BAM). However, the accuracy of low-cost sensors has been questioned, thus impeding their wide adoption in practice. To evaluate the accuracy of low-cost PM sensors in the field, a multi-sensor platform has been developed and co-located with BAM in Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Korea from 15 January 2019 to 4 September 2019. In this paper, a sample variation of low-cost sensors has been analyzed while using three commercial low-cost PM sensors. Influences on PM sensor by environmental conditions, such as humidity, temperature, and ambient light, have also been described. Based on this information, we developed a novel combined calibration algorithm, which selectively applies multiple calibration models and statistically reduces residuals, while using a prebuilt parameter lookup table where each cell records statistical parameters of each calibration model at current input parameters. As our proposed framework significantly improves the accuracy of the low-cost PM sensors (e.g., RMSE: 23.94 → 4.70 <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">μ</mi> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula>g/m<inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msup> <mrow></mrow> <mn>3</mn> </msup> </mrow> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula>) and increases the correlation (e.g., R<inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <msup> <mrow></mrow> <mn>2</mn> </msup> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula>: 0.41 → 0.89), this calibration model can be transferred to all sensor nodes through the sensor network.
ISSN:1424-8220