Randomized controlled trials on promoting self-care behaviors among informal caregivers of older patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background Informal caregivers of older patients often neglect their self-care, despite the mental and physical health effects of caregiving. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on self-care interventions for informal caregivers are lacking, making it difficult to determine effective strate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Huanran Liu, Vivian W. Q. Lou, Shicheng Xu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-01-01
Series:BMC Geriatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04614-6
_version_ 1797276309949251584
author Huanran Liu
Vivian W. Q. Lou
Shicheng Xu
author_facet Huanran Liu
Vivian W. Q. Lou
Shicheng Xu
author_sort Huanran Liu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Informal caregivers of older patients often neglect their self-care, despite the mental and physical health effects of caregiving. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on self-care interventions for informal caregivers are lacking, making it difficult to determine effective strategies. This systematic review explored the definition and categories of self-care RCTs for informal caregivers and a meta-analysis was conducted to determine the effectiveness of these interventions. Methods Seven databases (Scopus, Web of Science, MEDLINE, PubMed, ProQuest, CINAHL, and Embase) were searched for articles in English reporting on self-care intervention outcomes for informal caregivers of patients aged 60 years or older. Standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. Subgroup, sensitivity, and publication bias analyses were conducted. Results Eighteen studies were included in the systematic review, of which fifteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. RCTs lacked a clear definition of self-care, mainly focused on promoting physical and mental health and individual capacity, and neglected disease prevention. The interventions focused on self-management for health and individual agency, with less attention on health literacy, decision-making capacity, self-monitoring for health status, and linkage to the health system. Meta-analysis results showed that RCTs had a small effect on reducing anxiety (SMD = -0.142, 95% CI [-0.302, 0.017], p = .081) but a significant effect on reducing depression (SMD = -0.214, 95% CI [-0.353, -0.076], p = .002). Country and type of caregiver significantly contributed to the effect of reducing caregivers’ depression in subgroup analysis. Conclusions Studies on caregiver-centered self-care interventions are limited, resulting in a lack of a clear definition and comprehensive intervention. RCTs indicated a small effect on informal caregivers’ mental health, and interventions should consider both mental and physical health. More evidence is needed on the effectiveness of self-care interventions for informal caregivers’ anxiety and physical health.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T15:26:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0d30f309631f462a984487d8f8fe739b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2318
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T15:26:25Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Geriatrics
spelling doaj.art-0d30f309631f462a984487d8f8fe739b2024-03-05T16:41:59ZengBMCBMC Geriatrics1471-23182024-01-0124111710.1186/s12877-023-04614-6Randomized controlled trials on promoting self-care behaviors among informal caregivers of older patients: a systematic review and meta-analysisHuanran Liu0Vivian W. Q. Lou1Shicheng Xu2Department of Social Work & Social Administration, The University of Hong KongDepartment of Social Work & Social Administration, The University of Hong KongDepartment of Social Work & Social Administration, The University of Hong KongAbstract Background Informal caregivers of older patients often neglect their self-care, despite the mental and physical health effects of caregiving. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on self-care interventions for informal caregivers are lacking, making it difficult to determine effective strategies. This systematic review explored the definition and categories of self-care RCTs for informal caregivers and a meta-analysis was conducted to determine the effectiveness of these interventions. Methods Seven databases (Scopus, Web of Science, MEDLINE, PubMed, ProQuest, CINAHL, and Embase) were searched for articles in English reporting on self-care intervention outcomes for informal caregivers of patients aged 60 years or older. Standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. Subgroup, sensitivity, and publication bias analyses were conducted. Results Eighteen studies were included in the systematic review, of which fifteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. RCTs lacked a clear definition of self-care, mainly focused on promoting physical and mental health and individual capacity, and neglected disease prevention. The interventions focused on self-management for health and individual agency, with less attention on health literacy, decision-making capacity, self-monitoring for health status, and linkage to the health system. Meta-analysis results showed that RCTs had a small effect on reducing anxiety (SMD = -0.142, 95% CI [-0.302, 0.017], p = .081) but a significant effect on reducing depression (SMD = -0.214, 95% CI [-0.353, -0.076], p = .002). Country and type of caregiver significantly contributed to the effect of reducing caregivers’ depression in subgroup analysis. Conclusions Studies on caregiver-centered self-care interventions are limited, resulting in a lack of a clear definition and comprehensive intervention. RCTs indicated a small effect on informal caregivers’ mental health, and interventions should consider both mental and physical health. More evidence is needed on the effectiveness of self-care interventions for informal caregivers’ anxiety and physical health.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04614-6Self-careSelf-managementInformal caregiversRandomized controlled trialMeta-analysis
spellingShingle Huanran Liu
Vivian W. Q. Lou
Shicheng Xu
Randomized controlled trials on promoting self-care behaviors among informal caregivers of older patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BMC Geriatrics
Self-care
Self-management
Informal caregivers
Randomized controlled trial
Meta-analysis
title Randomized controlled trials on promoting self-care behaviors among informal caregivers of older patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Randomized controlled trials on promoting self-care behaviors among informal caregivers of older patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Randomized controlled trials on promoting self-care behaviors among informal caregivers of older patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Randomized controlled trials on promoting self-care behaviors among informal caregivers of older patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Randomized controlled trials on promoting self-care behaviors among informal caregivers of older patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort randomized controlled trials on promoting self care behaviors among informal caregivers of older patients a systematic review and meta analysis
topic Self-care
Self-management
Informal caregivers
Randomized controlled trial
Meta-analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04614-6
work_keys_str_mv AT huanranliu randomizedcontrolledtrialsonpromotingselfcarebehaviorsamonginformalcaregiversofolderpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vivianwqlou randomizedcontrolledtrialsonpromotingselfcarebehaviorsamonginformalcaregiversofolderpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shichengxu randomizedcontrolledtrialsonpromotingselfcarebehaviorsamonginformalcaregiversofolderpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis