FORENSIC ISSUES OF CATEGORIZING CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AS PERMANENT STRUCTURES: METHODOLOGICAL GUIDELINES FOR FORENSIC EXAMINERS
The article addresses the issue of subsuming construction projects under the category of permanent (non-permanent) structures. The authors offer detailed criteria for successful resolution of this issue, and present the appropriate course of inquiry for this line of forensic engineering investigatio...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Russian |
| Published: |
Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation, Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science
2018-03-01
|
| Series: | Теория и практика судебной экспертизы |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.tipse.ru/jour/article/view/387 |
| _version_ | 1797872462535327744 |
|---|---|
| author | Andrei R. Chudievich Andrei Yu. Butyrin Dar'ya V. Khamidova |
| author_facet | Andrei R. Chudievich Andrei Yu. Butyrin Dar'ya V. Khamidova |
| author_sort | Andrei R. Chudievich |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The article addresses the issue of subsuming construction projects under the category of permanent (non-permanent) structures. The authors offer detailed criteria for successful resolution of this issue, and present the appropriate course of inquiry for this line of forensic engineering investigation. Special emphasis is placed on the resolution of complex forensic situations. The paper incorporates a systematic overview of primary and secondary indicators for identifying buildings, structures and facilities as permanent or non-permanent. Recommendations draw on extensive regulatory resources, as well as generalization, systematization and analysis of current forensic practices, and are illustrated with specific examples. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T01:00:15Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-0d36d657829d41f8bca87876e44161c8 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1819-2785 2587-7275 |
| language | Russian |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T01:00:15Z |
| publishDate | 2018-03-01 |
| publisher | Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation, Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Теория и практика судебной экспертизы |
| spelling | doaj.art-0d36d657829d41f8bca87876e44161c82023-03-13T10:00:18ZrusMinistry of Justice of the Russian Federation, Russian Federal Centre of Forensic ScienceТеория и практика судебной экспертизы1819-27852587-72752018-03-01131415110.30764/1819-2785-2018-13-1-41-51376FORENSIC ISSUES OF CATEGORIZING CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AS PERMANENT STRUCTURES: METHODOLOGICAL GUIDELINES FOR FORENSIC EXAMINERSAndrei R. Chudievich0Andrei Yu. Butyrin1Dar'ya V. Khamidova2Федеральное бюджетное учреждение Российский федеральный центр судебной экспертизы при Министерстве юстиции Российской ФедерацииФедеральное бюджетное учреждение Российский федеральный центр судебной экспертизы при Министерстве юстиции Российской Федерации; ФГБОУ ВО Национальный исследовательский Московский государственный строительный университетФедеральное бюджетное учреждение Российский федеральный центр судебной экспертизы при Министерстве юстиции Российской ФедерацииThe article addresses the issue of subsuming construction projects under the category of permanent (non-permanent) structures. The authors offer detailed criteria for successful resolution of this issue, and present the appropriate course of inquiry for this line of forensic engineering investigation. Special emphasis is placed on the resolution of complex forensic situations. The paper incorporates a systematic overview of primary and secondary indicators for identifying buildings, structures and facilities as permanent or non-permanent. Recommendations draw on extensive regulatory resources, as well as generalization, systematization and analysis of current forensic practices, and are illustrated with specific examples.https://www.tipse.ru/jour/article/view/387капитальное строениевременное сооружениеглубина заложения фундаментасборно-разборные элементы зданиясрок эксплуатации строительного объектаинженерные коммуникациилинейные объектыподземные сооружения |
| spellingShingle | Andrei R. Chudievich Andrei Yu. Butyrin Dar'ya V. Khamidova FORENSIC ISSUES OF CATEGORIZING CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AS PERMANENT STRUCTURES: METHODOLOGICAL GUIDELINES FOR FORENSIC EXAMINERS Теория и практика судебной экспертизы капитальное строение временное сооружение глубина заложения фундамента сборно-разборные элементы здания срок эксплуатации строительного объекта инженерные коммуникации линейные объекты подземные сооружения |
| title | FORENSIC ISSUES OF CATEGORIZING CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AS PERMANENT STRUCTURES: METHODOLOGICAL GUIDELINES FOR FORENSIC EXAMINERS |
| title_full | FORENSIC ISSUES OF CATEGORIZING CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AS PERMANENT STRUCTURES: METHODOLOGICAL GUIDELINES FOR FORENSIC EXAMINERS |
| title_fullStr | FORENSIC ISSUES OF CATEGORIZING CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AS PERMANENT STRUCTURES: METHODOLOGICAL GUIDELINES FOR FORENSIC EXAMINERS |
| title_full_unstemmed | FORENSIC ISSUES OF CATEGORIZING CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AS PERMANENT STRUCTURES: METHODOLOGICAL GUIDELINES FOR FORENSIC EXAMINERS |
| title_short | FORENSIC ISSUES OF CATEGORIZING CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AS PERMANENT STRUCTURES: METHODOLOGICAL GUIDELINES FOR FORENSIC EXAMINERS |
| title_sort | forensic issues of categorizing construction projects as permanent structures methodological guidelines for forensic examiners |
| topic | капитальное строение временное сооружение глубина заложения фундамента сборно-разборные элементы здания срок эксплуатации строительного объекта инженерные коммуникации линейные объекты подземные сооружения |
| url | https://www.tipse.ru/jour/article/view/387 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT andreirchudievich forensicissuesofcategorizingconstructionprojectsaspermanentstructuresmethodologicalguidelinesforforensicexaminers AT andreiyubutyrin forensicissuesofcategorizingconstructionprojectsaspermanentstructuresmethodologicalguidelinesforforensicexaminers AT daryavkhamidova forensicissuesofcategorizingconstructionprojectsaspermanentstructuresmethodologicalguidelinesforforensicexaminers |