Overcoming Expert Disagreement In A Delphi Process. An Exercise In Reverse Epistemology
Disagreement among experts is a central topic in social epistemology. What should an expert do when confronted with the different opinion of an epistemic peer? Possible answers include the steadfast view (holding to one’s belief), the abstemious view (suspending one’s judgment), and moderate concili...
Main Author: | Elisabetta Lalumera |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Associazione Culturale Humana.Mente
2015-05-01
|
Series: | Humana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.humanamente.eu/index.php/HM/article/view/82 |
Similar Items
-
The Epistemic Value of Deep Disagreements
by: Kirk Lougheed
Published: (2018-06-01) -
Gnostic Disagreement Norms
by: Domingos Faria
Published: (2022-01-01) -
Overcoming Disagreement Through Ordering: Building an Epistemic Hierarchy
by: Hinton Martin
Published: (2018-09-01) -
Contextualist Answers to the Challenge from Disagreement
by: Dan Zeman
Published: (2017-08-01) -
Peer Disagreement, Testimony, and Personal Justification
by: Nicholas D. Smith
Published: (2015-07-01)