Soil Quality Assessment of Acid Sulfate Paddy Soils with Different Productivities in Guangdong Province, China

Land conversion is considered an effective measure to ensure national food security in China, but little information is available on the quality of low productivity soils, in particular those in acid sulfate soil regions. In our study, acid sulfate paddy soils were divided into soils with high, medi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhan-jun LIU, Wei ZHOU, Jian-bo SHEN, Shu-tian LI, Guo-qing LIANG, Xiu-bin WANG, Jing-wen SUN, Chao AI
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2014-01-01
Series:Journal of Integrative Agriculture
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095311913605948
_version_ 1818865379520282624
author Zhan-jun LIU
Wei ZHOU
Jian-bo SHEN
Shu-tian LI
Guo-qing LIANG
Xiu-bin WANG
Jing-wen SUN
Chao AI
author_facet Zhan-jun LIU
Wei ZHOU
Jian-bo SHEN
Shu-tian LI
Guo-qing LIANG
Xiu-bin WANG
Jing-wen SUN
Chao AI
author_sort Zhan-jun LIU
collection DOAJ
description Land conversion is considered an effective measure to ensure national food security in China, but little information is available on the quality of low productivity soils, in particular those in acid sulfate soil regions. In our study, acid sulfate paddy soils were divided into soils with high, medium and low levels based on local rice productivity, and 60 soil samples were collected for analysis. Twenty soil variables including physical, chemical and biochemical properties were determined. Those variables that were significantly different between the high, medium and low productivity soils were selected for principal component analysis, and microbial biomass carbon (MBC), total nitrogen (TN), available silicon (ASi), pH and available zinc (AZn) were retained in the minimum data set (MDS). After scoring the MDS variables, they were integrated to calculate a soil quality index (SQI), and the high, medium and low productivity paddy soils received mean SQI scores of 0.95, 0.83 and 0.60, respectively. Low productivity paddy soils showed worse soil quality, and a large discrepancy was observed between the low and high productivity paddy soils. Lower MBC, TN, ASi, pH and available K (AK) were considered as the primary limiting factors. Additionally, all the soil samples collected were rich in available P and AZn, but deficient in AK and ASi. The results suggest that soil AK and ASi deficiencies were the main limiting factors for all the studied acid sulfate paddy soil regions. The application of K and Si on a national basis and other sustainable management approaches are suggested to improve rice productivity, especially for low productivity paddy soils. Our results indicated that there is a large potential for increasing productivity and producing more cereals in acid sulfate paddy soil regions.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T10:46:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0d44e3aba08845e6a4b2c18d7455c154
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2095-3119
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T10:46:37Z
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Integrative Agriculture
spelling doaj.art-0d44e3aba08845e6a4b2c18d7455c1542022-12-21T20:25:15ZengElsevierJournal of Integrative Agriculture2095-31192014-01-01131177186Soil Quality Assessment of Acid Sulfate Paddy Soils with Different Productivities in Guangdong Province, ChinaZhan-jun LIU0Wei ZHOU1Jian-bo SHEN2Shu-tian LI3Guo-qing LIANG4Xiu-bin WANG5Jing-wen SUN6Chao AI7Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and Fertilization, Ministry of Agriculture/Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, P.R.ChinaKey Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and Fertilization, Ministry of Agriculture/Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, P.R.China; Correspondence ZHOU Wei, Tel: +86-10-82108671College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, P.R.ChinaKey Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and Fertilization, Ministry of Agriculture/Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, P.R.ChinaKey Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and Fertilization, Ministry of Agriculture/Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, P.R.ChinaKey Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and Fertilization, Ministry of Agriculture/Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, P.R.ChinaKey Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and Fertilization, Ministry of Agriculture/Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, P.R.ChinaKey Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and Fertilization, Ministry of Agriculture/Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, P.R.ChinaLand conversion is considered an effective measure to ensure national food security in China, but little information is available on the quality of low productivity soils, in particular those in acid sulfate soil regions. In our study, acid sulfate paddy soils were divided into soils with high, medium and low levels based on local rice productivity, and 60 soil samples were collected for analysis. Twenty soil variables including physical, chemical and biochemical properties were determined. Those variables that were significantly different between the high, medium and low productivity soils were selected for principal component analysis, and microbial biomass carbon (MBC), total nitrogen (TN), available silicon (ASi), pH and available zinc (AZn) were retained in the minimum data set (MDS). After scoring the MDS variables, they were integrated to calculate a soil quality index (SQI), and the high, medium and low productivity paddy soils received mean SQI scores of 0.95, 0.83 and 0.60, respectively. Low productivity paddy soils showed worse soil quality, and a large discrepancy was observed between the low and high productivity paddy soils. Lower MBC, TN, ASi, pH and available K (AK) were considered as the primary limiting factors. Additionally, all the soil samples collected were rich in available P and AZn, but deficient in AK and ASi. The results suggest that soil AK and ASi deficiencies were the main limiting factors for all the studied acid sulfate paddy soil regions. The application of K and Si on a national basis and other sustainable management approaches are suggested to improve rice productivity, especially for low productivity paddy soils. Our results indicated that there is a large potential for increasing productivity and producing more cereals in acid sulfate paddy soil regions.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095311913605948soil quality assessmentacid sulfate paddy soilsoil quality indexdifferent productivity
spellingShingle Zhan-jun LIU
Wei ZHOU
Jian-bo SHEN
Shu-tian LI
Guo-qing LIANG
Xiu-bin WANG
Jing-wen SUN
Chao AI
Soil Quality Assessment of Acid Sulfate Paddy Soils with Different Productivities in Guangdong Province, China
Journal of Integrative Agriculture
soil quality assessment
acid sulfate paddy soil
soil quality index
different productivity
title Soil Quality Assessment of Acid Sulfate Paddy Soils with Different Productivities in Guangdong Province, China
title_full Soil Quality Assessment of Acid Sulfate Paddy Soils with Different Productivities in Guangdong Province, China
title_fullStr Soil Quality Assessment of Acid Sulfate Paddy Soils with Different Productivities in Guangdong Province, China
title_full_unstemmed Soil Quality Assessment of Acid Sulfate Paddy Soils with Different Productivities in Guangdong Province, China
title_short Soil Quality Assessment of Acid Sulfate Paddy Soils with Different Productivities in Guangdong Province, China
title_sort soil quality assessment of acid sulfate paddy soils with different productivities in guangdong province china
topic soil quality assessment
acid sulfate paddy soil
soil quality index
different productivity
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095311913605948
work_keys_str_mv AT zhanjunliu soilqualityassessmentofacidsulfatepaddysoilswithdifferentproductivitiesinguangdongprovincechina
AT weizhou soilqualityassessmentofacidsulfatepaddysoilswithdifferentproductivitiesinguangdongprovincechina
AT jianboshen soilqualityassessmentofacidsulfatepaddysoilswithdifferentproductivitiesinguangdongprovincechina
AT shutianli soilqualityassessmentofacidsulfatepaddysoilswithdifferentproductivitiesinguangdongprovincechina
AT guoqingliang soilqualityassessmentofacidsulfatepaddysoilswithdifferentproductivitiesinguangdongprovincechina
AT xiubinwang soilqualityassessmentofacidsulfatepaddysoilswithdifferentproductivitiesinguangdongprovincechina
AT jingwensun soilqualityassessmentofacidsulfatepaddysoilswithdifferentproductivitiesinguangdongprovincechina
AT chaoai soilqualityassessmentofacidsulfatepaddysoilswithdifferentproductivitiesinguangdongprovincechina