Gore-tex® versus resolut adapt® GTR membranes with perioglas® in periodontal regeneration
Background: Successful reconstruction of periodontal tissues destroyed due to periodontitis has been an evasive goal for the periodontists. Several GTR materials and bone grafts have been tried with varied success rates. Aims and Objectives: The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare t...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2012-01-01
|
| Series: | Contemporary Clinical Dentistry |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.contempclindent.org/article.asp?issn=0976-237X;year=2012;volume=3;issue=4;spage=406;epage=411;aulast=Wadhawan |
| _version_ | 1818147385300221952 |
|---|---|
| author | Amit Wadhawan Triveni Mavinakote Gowda Dhoom Singh Mehta |
| author_facet | Amit Wadhawan Triveni Mavinakote Gowda Dhoom Singh Mehta |
| author_sort | Amit Wadhawan |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background: Successful reconstruction of periodontal tissues destroyed due to periodontitis has been an evasive goal for the periodontists. Several GTR materials and bone grafts have been tried with varied success rates. Aims and Objectives: The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of non-resorbable (GoreTex® ) and bioabsorbable (Resolut Adapt® ) membranes in combination with bioactive glass (PerioGlas® ) in the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects. Materials and Methods: Ten chronic periodontitis patients having bilateral matched intrabony defects were treated with non-resorbable membrane (GoreTex® ) and bioactive glass or the bioresorbable membrane (Resolut Adapt® ) and bioactive glass in split mouth design. Clinical parameters like plaque index, gingival index, probing pocket depth, clinical attachment level, and gingival recession were recorded at baseline and 9 months post-operatively. Similarly, radiographic (linear CADIA) and intra-surgical (re-entry) measurements were evaluated at baseline and 9 months post-operatively). Results: Both the membrane groups showed clinically and statistically significant improvement in clinical parameters i.e., reduction in probing depth (4.6 ± 1.4 mm) vs. 3.7 ± 1.3 mm) and gain in clinical attachment level (4.6 + 1.6 vs. 3.2 ± 1.5 mm) for non-resorbable and bioresorbable membrane groups, respectively. Similar trend was observed when radiographical and intra-surgical (re-entry) measurements were evaluated and compared, pre- and post-operatively at 9 months. However, on comparison between the two groups, the difference was statistically not significant. Conclusion: Both the barrier membranes i.e., non-resorbable (Gore-Tex® ) and bioabsorbable (Resolut Adapt® ) membranes in combination with bioactive glass (PerioGlas® ) were equally effective in enhancing the periodontal regeneration. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-11T12:34:24Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-0d47ffbb68aa4b7ebf900fa214afa7cb |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0976-237X 0976-2361 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-11T12:34:24Z |
| publishDate | 2012-01-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Contemporary Clinical Dentistry |
| spelling | doaj.art-0d47ffbb68aa4b7ebf900fa214afa7cb2022-12-22T01:07:10ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsContemporary Clinical Dentistry0976-237X0976-23612012-01-013440641110.4103/0976-237X.107427Gore-tex® versus resolut adapt® GTR membranes with perioglas® in periodontal regenerationAmit WadhawanTriveni Mavinakote GowdaDhoom Singh MehtaBackground: Successful reconstruction of periodontal tissues destroyed due to periodontitis has been an evasive goal for the periodontists. Several GTR materials and bone grafts have been tried with varied success rates. Aims and Objectives: The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of non-resorbable (GoreTex® ) and bioabsorbable (Resolut Adapt® ) membranes in combination with bioactive glass (PerioGlas® ) in the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects. Materials and Methods: Ten chronic periodontitis patients having bilateral matched intrabony defects were treated with non-resorbable membrane (GoreTex® ) and bioactive glass or the bioresorbable membrane (Resolut Adapt® ) and bioactive glass in split mouth design. Clinical parameters like plaque index, gingival index, probing pocket depth, clinical attachment level, and gingival recession were recorded at baseline and 9 months post-operatively. Similarly, radiographic (linear CADIA) and intra-surgical (re-entry) measurements were evaluated at baseline and 9 months post-operatively). Results: Both the membrane groups showed clinically and statistically significant improvement in clinical parameters i.e., reduction in probing depth (4.6 ± 1.4 mm) vs. 3.7 ± 1.3 mm) and gain in clinical attachment level (4.6 + 1.6 vs. 3.2 ± 1.5 mm) for non-resorbable and bioresorbable membrane groups, respectively. Similar trend was observed when radiographical and intra-surgical (re-entry) measurements were evaluated and compared, pre- and post-operatively at 9 months. However, on comparison between the two groups, the difference was statistically not significant. Conclusion: Both the barrier membranes i.e., non-resorbable (Gore-Tex® ) and bioabsorbable (Resolut Adapt® ) membranes in combination with bioactive glass (PerioGlas® ) were equally effective in enhancing the periodontal regeneration.http://www.contempclindent.org/article.asp?issn=0976-237X;year=2012;volume=3;issue=4;spage=406;epage=411;aulast=WadhawanBioactive glassguided tissue regenerationperiodontal intrabony defects |
| spellingShingle | Amit Wadhawan Triveni Mavinakote Gowda Dhoom Singh Mehta Gore-tex® versus resolut adapt® GTR membranes with perioglas® in periodontal regeneration Contemporary Clinical Dentistry Bioactive glass guided tissue regeneration periodontal intrabony defects |
| title | Gore-tex® versus resolut adapt® GTR membranes with perioglas® in periodontal regeneration |
| title_full | Gore-tex® versus resolut adapt® GTR membranes with perioglas® in periodontal regeneration |
| title_fullStr | Gore-tex® versus resolut adapt® GTR membranes with perioglas® in periodontal regeneration |
| title_full_unstemmed | Gore-tex® versus resolut adapt® GTR membranes with perioglas® in periodontal regeneration |
| title_short | Gore-tex® versus resolut adapt® GTR membranes with perioglas® in periodontal regeneration |
| title_sort | gore tex r versus resolut adapt r gtr membranes with perioglas r in periodontal regeneration |
| topic | Bioactive glass guided tissue regeneration periodontal intrabony defects |
| url | http://www.contempclindent.org/article.asp?issn=0976-237X;year=2012;volume=3;issue=4;spage=406;epage=411;aulast=Wadhawan |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT amitwadhawan goretexversusresolutadaptgtrmembraneswithperioglasinperiodontalregeneration AT trivenimavinakotegowda goretexversusresolutadaptgtrmembraneswithperioglasinperiodontalregeneration AT dhoomsinghmehta goretexversusresolutadaptgtrmembraneswithperioglasinperiodontalregeneration |