Are fire intensity and burn severity associated? Advancing our understanding of FRP and NBR metrics from Himawari-8/9 and Sentinel-2

Burn severity has been widely studied. Typical approaches use spectral differencing indices from remotely sensed data to extrapolate in-situ severity assessments. Next generation geostationary data offer near-continuous fire behaviour information, which has been used for fire detection and monitorin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Konstantinos Chatzopoulos-Vouzoglanis, Karin J. Reinke, Mariela Soto-Berelov, Simon D. Jones
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-03-01
Series:International Journal of Applied Earth Observations and Geoinformation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S156984322400027X
_version_ 1827347509856436224
author Konstantinos Chatzopoulos-Vouzoglanis
Karin J. Reinke
Mariela Soto-Berelov
Simon D. Jones
author_facet Konstantinos Chatzopoulos-Vouzoglanis
Karin J. Reinke
Mariela Soto-Berelov
Simon D. Jones
author_sort Konstantinos Chatzopoulos-Vouzoglanis
collection DOAJ
description Burn severity has been widely studied. Typical approaches use spectral differencing indices from remotely sensed data to extrapolate in-situ severity assessments. Next generation geostationary data offer near-continuous fire behaviour information, which has been used for fire detection and monitoring but remains underutilized for fire impact estimation. Here, we explore the association between remotely sensed fire intensity metrics and spectral differencing severity indices to understand whether and where they describe similar wildfire effects. The commonly used Differenced Normalised Burn Ratio (dNBR) severity index was calculated for Advanced Himawari Imager (AHI − 2 km) and Sentinel-2 (20 m) data and compared to different Fire Radiative Power (FRP) metrics derived from fire hotspot detections from AHI data across Australia. The comparison was implemented through different stratifications based on biogeographical region, land cover, fire type, and percentage of AHI pixel burned (fire fractional cover). The results indicate that FRP and dNBR metrics do not correlate in most scenarios, noting correlations being marginally stronger for hotter fires. However, correlations become significantly stronger when data are grouped using fire type information and fire fractional cover, with correlations peaking (R = 0.75) for large fires that burned 41–60 % of an AHI pixel. In conclusion, remotely sensed fire intensity and severity proxies capture different aspects of wildfire impact, that only correlate with each other after using auxiliary data. Spectral differencing severity metrics have been used extensively during the past decades, however high-frequency fire intensity estimations have the potential to augment the existing information and reveal new ways of characterizing wildfire impact over large areas.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T23:51:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0d6b6aa9dc734c1f8c4697469dc08316
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1569-8432
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T23:51:40Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series International Journal of Applied Earth Observations and Geoinformation
spelling doaj.art-0d6b6aa9dc734c1f8c4697469dc083162024-02-19T04:13:13ZengElsevierInternational Journal of Applied Earth Observations and Geoinformation1569-84322024-03-01127103673Are fire intensity and burn severity associated? Advancing our understanding of FRP and NBR metrics from Himawari-8/9 and Sentinel-2Konstantinos Chatzopoulos-Vouzoglanis0Karin J. Reinke1Mariela Soto-Berelov2Simon D. Jones3Corresponding author at: Geospatial Science, School of Science, STEM College, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.; Geospatial Science, School of Science, STEM College, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; SmartSat Cooperative Research Centre, Eleanor Harrald Building, Lot Fourteen, Frome Road, Adelaide, SA 5000, AustraliaGeospatial Science, School of Science, STEM College, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; SmartSat Cooperative Research Centre, Eleanor Harrald Building, Lot Fourteen, Frome Road, Adelaide, SA 5000, AustraliaGeospatial Science, School of Science, STEM College, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; SmartSat Cooperative Research Centre, Eleanor Harrald Building, Lot Fourteen, Frome Road, Adelaide, SA 5000, AustraliaGeospatial Science, School of Science, STEM College, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; SmartSat Cooperative Research Centre, Eleanor Harrald Building, Lot Fourteen, Frome Road, Adelaide, SA 5000, AustraliaBurn severity has been widely studied. Typical approaches use spectral differencing indices from remotely sensed data to extrapolate in-situ severity assessments. Next generation geostationary data offer near-continuous fire behaviour information, which has been used for fire detection and monitoring but remains underutilized for fire impact estimation. Here, we explore the association between remotely sensed fire intensity metrics and spectral differencing severity indices to understand whether and where they describe similar wildfire effects. The commonly used Differenced Normalised Burn Ratio (dNBR) severity index was calculated for Advanced Himawari Imager (AHI − 2 km) and Sentinel-2 (20 m) data and compared to different Fire Radiative Power (FRP) metrics derived from fire hotspot detections from AHI data across Australia. The comparison was implemented through different stratifications based on biogeographical region, land cover, fire type, and percentage of AHI pixel burned (fire fractional cover). The results indicate that FRP and dNBR metrics do not correlate in most scenarios, noting correlations being marginally stronger for hotter fires. However, correlations become significantly stronger when data are grouped using fire type information and fire fractional cover, with correlations peaking (R = 0.75) for large fires that burned 41–60 % of an AHI pixel. In conclusion, remotely sensed fire intensity and severity proxies capture different aspects of wildfire impact, that only correlate with each other after using auxiliary data. Spectral differencing severity metrics have been used extensively during the past decades, however high-frequency fire intensity estimations have the potential to augment the existing information and reveal new ways of characterizing wildfire impact over large areas.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S156984322400027XFire radiative powerGeostationaryFire intensityBurn severityHimawariSentinel-2
spellingShingle Konstantinos Chatzopoulos-Vouzoglanis
Karin J. Reinke
Mariela Soto-Berelov
Simon D. Jones
Are fire intensity and burn severity associated? Advancing our understanding of FRP and NBR metrics from Himawari-8/9 and Sentinel-2
International Journal of Applied Earth Observations and Geoinformation
Fire radiative power
Geostationary
Fire intensity
Burn severity
Himawari
Sentinel-2
title Are fire intensity and burn severity associated? Advancing our understanding of FRP and NBR metrics from Himawari-8/9 and Sentinel-2
title_full Are fire intensity and burn severity associated? Advancing our understanding of FRP and NBR metrics from Himawari-8/9 and Sentinel-2
title_fullStr Are fire intensity and burn severity associated? Advancing our understanding of FRP and NBR metrics from Himawari-8/9 and Sentinel-2
title_full_unstemmed Are fire intensity and burn severity associated? Advancing our understanding of FRP and NBR metrics from Himawari-8/9 and Sentinel-2
title_short Are fire intensity and burn severity associated? Advancing our understanding of FRP and NBR metrics from Himawari-8/9 and Sentinel-2
title_sort are fire intensity and burn severity associated advancing our understanding of frp and nbr metrics from himawari 8 9 and sentinel 2
topic Fire radiative power
Geostationary
Fire intensity
Burn severity
Himawari
Sentinel-2
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S156984322400027X
work_keys_str_mv AT konstantinoschatzopoulosvouzoglanis arefireintensityandburnseverityassociatedadvancingourunderstandingoffrpandnbrmetricsfromhimawari89andsentinel2
AT karinjreinke arefireintensityandburnseverityassociatedadvancingourunderstandingoffrpandnbrmetricsfromhimawari89andsentinel2
AT marielasotoberelov arefireintensityandburnseverityassociatedadvancingourunderstandingoffrpandnbrmetricsfromhimawari89andsentinel2
AT simondjones arefireintensityandburnseverityassociatedadvancingourunderstandingoffrpandnbrmetricsfromhimawari89andsentinel2