Ventilatory efficiency in pulmonary vascular diseases

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is a frequently used tool in the differential diagnosis of dyspnoea. Ventilatory inefficiency, defined as high minute ventilation (V′E) relative to carbon dioxide output (V′CO2), is a hallmark characteristic of pulmonary vascular diseases, which contributes to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jason Weatherald, Brianne Philipenko, David Montani, Pierantonio Laveneziana
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: European Respiratory Society 2021-07-01
Series:European Respiratory Review
Online Access:http://err.ersjournals.com/content/30/161/200214.full
_version_ 1819147742309515264
author Jason Weatherald
Brianne Philipenko
David Montani
Pierantonio Laveneziana
author_facet Jason Weatherald
Brianne Philipenko
David Montani
Pierantonio Laveneziana
author_sort Jason Weatherald
collection DOAJ
description Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is a frequently used tool in the differential diagnosis of dyspnoea. Ventilatory inefficiency, defined as high minute ventilation (V′E) relative to carbon dioxide output (V′CO2), is a hallmark characteristic of pulmonary vascular diseases, which contributes to exercise intolerance and disability in these patients. The mechanisms of ventilatory inefficiency are multiple and include high physiologic dead space, abnormal chemosensitivity and an altered carbon dioxide (CO2) set-point. A normal V′E/V′CO2 makes a pulmonary vascular disease such as pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) unlikely. The finding of high V′E/V′CO2 without an alternative explanation should prompt further diagnostic testing to exclude PAH or CTEPH, particularly in patients with risk factors, such as prior venous thromboembolism, systemic sclerosis or a family history of PAH. In patients with established PAH or CTEPH, the V′E/V′CO2 may improve with interventions and is a prognostic marker. However, further studies are needed to clarify the added value of assessing ventilatory inefficiency in the longitudinal follow-up of patients.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T13:34:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0d6fb816d9564e86ad94b9ac104a00d4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0905-9180
1600-0617
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T13:34:39Z
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher European Respiratory Society
record_format Article
series European Respiratory Review
spelling doaj.art-0d6fb816d9564e86ad94b9ac104a00d42022-12-21T18:24:04ZengEuropean Respiratory SocietyEuropean Respiratory Review0905-91801600-06172021-07-013016110.1183/16000617.0214-20200214-2020Ventilatory efficiency in pulmonary vascular diseasesJason Weatherald0Brianne Philipenko1David Montani2Pierantonio Laveneziana3 Dept of Medicine, Division of Respirology, University of Calgary, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Canada Dept of Medicine, Division of Respirology, University of Calgary, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Canada Faculty of Medicine, Université Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMRS1158 Neurophysiologie respiratoire expérimentale et clinique, Paris, France Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is a frequently used tool in the differential diagnosis of dyspnoea. Ventilatory inefficiency, defined as high minute ventilation (V′E) relative to carbon dioxide output (V′CO2), is a hallmark characteristic of pulmonary vascular diseases, which contributes to exercise intolerance and disability in these patients. The mechanisms of ventilatory inefficiency are multiple and include high physiologic dead space, abnormal chemosensitivity and an altered carbon dioxide (CO2) set-point. A normal V′E/V′CO2 makes a pulmonary vascular disease such as pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) unlikely. The finding of high V′E/V′CO2 without an alternative explanation should prompt further diagnostic testing to exclude PAH or CTEPH, particularly in patients with risk factors, such as prior venous thromboembolism, systemic sclerosis or a family history of PAH. In patients with established PAH or CTEPH, the V′E/V′CO2 may improve with interventions and is a prognostic marker. However, further studies are needed to clarify the added value of assessing ventilatory inefficiency in the longitudinal follow-up of patients.http://err.ersjournals.com/content/30/161/200214.full
spellingShingle Jason Weatherald
Brianne Philipenko
David Montani
Pierantonio Laveneziana
Ventilatory efficiency in pulmonary vascular diseases
European Respiratory Review
title Ventilatory efficiency in pulmonary vascular diseases
title_full Ventilatory efficiency in pulmonary vascular diseases
title_fullStr Ventilatory efficiency in pulmonary vascular diseases
title_full_unstemmed Ventilatory efficiency in pulmonary vascular diseases
title_short Ventilatory efficiency in pulmonary vascular diseases
title_sort ventilatory efficiency in pulmonary vascular diseases
url http://err.ersjournals.com/content/30/161/200214.full
work_keys_str_mv AT jasonweatherald ventilatoryefficiencyinpulmonaryvasculardiseases
AT briannephilipenko ventilatoryefficiencyinpulmonaryvasculardiseases
AT davidmontani ventilatoryefficiencyinpulmonaryvasculardiseases
AT pierantoniolaveneziana ventilatoryefficiencyinpulmonaryvasculardiseases