CT Hounsfield unit is a reliable parameter for screws loosening or cages subsidence in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

Abstract Retrospective cohort study. To validate computed tomography (CT) radiodensity in Hounsfield units (HU) as a prognostic marker for pedicle screw loosening or cage subsidence in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF). The retrospective study involved 198 patients...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yu-Cheng Yao, Hsien Chao, Kun-Yu Kao, Hsi-Hsien Lin, Shih-Tien Wang, Ming-Chau Chang, Chien-Lin Liu, Po-Hsin Chou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2023-01-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28555-7
_version_ 1811175789418250240
author Yu-Cheng Yao
Hsien Chao
Kun-Yu Kao
Hsi-Hsien Lin
Shih-Tien Wang
Ming-Chau Chang
Chien-Lin Liu
Po-Hsin Chou
author_facet Yu-Cheng Yao
Hsien Chao
Kun-Yu Kao
Hsi-Hsien Lin
Shih-Tien Wang
Ming-Chau Chang
Chien-Lin Liu
Po-Hsin Chou
author_sort Yu-Cheng Yao
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Retrospective cohort study. To validate computed tomography (CT) radiodensity in Hounsfield units (HU) as a prognostic marker for pedicle screw loosening or cage subsidence in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF). The retrospective study involved 198 patients treated with MI-TLIF. Screw loosening (SL), cage subsidence (CS), and fusion status were assessed by plain radiographs. The risk factors of SL and CS were identified using logistic regression. A total of 258 levels and 930 screws were analyzed. During a 2-year follow-up, 16.2% and 24.7% of patients had CS and SL respectively. The cut-off value of L1 HU for predicting SL or CS was 117. The L1 HU < 117 and BMI ≥ 25 were two independent risk factors. The risk of SL or CS was 4.1 fold in patients L1 HU < 117 and 2.6 fold in patients with BMI ≥ 25. For patients concurrently having BMI ≥ 25 and pre-op L1 HU < 117, the risk was 4.3 fold. Fusion rate and clinical outcome were comparable in patients with SL or CS. L1 HU < 117 and BMI > 25 were two independent risk factors that can be screened preoperatively for preventing SL or CS and lead to better management of patients undergoing MI-TLIF.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T19:42:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0d79fc60d0144253a2e3c6c95f15fd90
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T19:42:42Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-0d79fc60d0144253a2e3c6c95f15fd902023-01-29T12:13:12ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222023-01-011311910.1038/s41598-023-28555-7CT Hounsfield unit is a reliable parameter for screws loosening or cages subsidence in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusionYu-Cheng Yao0Hsien Chao1Kun-Yu Kao2Hsi-Hsien Lin3Shih-Tien Wang4Ming-Chau Chang5Chien-Lin Liu6Po-Hsin Chou7Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Taipei Veterans General HospitalSchool of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung UniversitySchool of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung UniversityDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Taipei Veterans General HospitalDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Taipei Veterans General HospitalDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Taipei Veterans General HospitalDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Taipei Veterans General HospitalDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Taipei Veterans General HospitalAbstract Retrospective cohort study. To validate computed tomography (CT) radiodensity in Hounsfield units (HU) as a prognostic marker for pedicle screw loosening or cage subsidence in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF). The retrospective study involved 198 patients treated with MI-TLIF. Screw loosening (SL), cage subsidence (CS), and fusion status were assessed by plain radiographs. The risk factors of SL and CS were identified using logistic regression. A total of 258 levels and 930 screws were analyzed. During a 2-year follow-up, 16.2% and 24.7% of patients had CS and SL respectively. The cut-off value of L1 HU for predicting SL or CS was 117. The L1 HU < 117 and BMI ≥ 25 were two independent risk factors. The risk of SL or CS was 4.1 fold in patients L1 HU < 117 and 2.6 fold in patients with BMI ≥ 25. For patients concurrently having BMI ≥ 25 and pre-op L1 HU < 117, the risk was 4.3 fold. Fusion rate and clinical outcome were comparable in patients with SL or CS. L1 HU < 117 and BMI > 25 were two independent risk factors that can be screened preoperatively for preventing SL or CS and lead to better management of patients undergoing MI-TLIF.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28555-7
spellingShingle Yu-Cheng Yao
Hsien Chao
Kun-Yu Kao
Hsi-Hsien Lin
Shih-Tien Wang
Ming-Chau Chang
Chien-Lin Liu
Po-Hsin Chou
CT Hounsfield unit is a reliable parameter for screws loosening or cages subsidence in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
Scientific Reports
title CT Hounsfield unit is a reliable parameter for screws loosening or cages subsidence in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
title_full CT Hounsfield unit is a reliable parameter for screws loosening or cages subsidence in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
title_fullStr CT Hounsfield unit is a reliable parameter for screws loosening or cages subsidence in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
title_full_unstemmed CT Hounsfield unit is a reliable parameter for screws loosening or cages subsidence in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
title_short CT Hounsfield unit is a reliable parameter for screws loosening or cages subsidence in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
title_sort ct hounsfield unit is a reliable parameter for screws loosening or cages subsidence in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28555-7
work_keys_str_mv AT yuchengyao cthounsfieldunitisareliableparameterforscrewslooseningorcagessubsidenceinminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion
AT hsienchao cthounsfieldunitisareliableparameterforscrewslooseningorcagessubsidenceinminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion
AT kunyukao cthounsfieldunitisareliableparameterforscrewslooseningorcagessubsidenceinminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion
AT hsihsienlin cthounsfieldunitisareliableparameterforscrewslooseningorcagessubsidenceinminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion
AT shihtienwang cthounsfieldunitisareliableparameterforscrewslooseningorcagessubsidenceinminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion
AT mingchauchang cthounsfieldunitisareliableparameterforscrewslooseningorcagessubsidenceinminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion
AT chienlinliu cthounsfieldunitisareliableparameterforscrewslooseningorcagessubsidenceinminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion
AT pohsinchou cthounsfieldunitisareliableparameterforscrewslooseningorcagessubsidenceinminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion