The Relationship between Theory of Mind and Intelligence: A Formative <i>g</i> Approach

Theory of Mind (ToM) is the ability understand that other people’s mental states may be different from one’s own. Psychometric models have shown that individual differences in ToM can largely be attributed to general intelligence (<i>g</i>) (Coyle et al. 2018). Most psychometric models s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ester Navarro, Sara Anne Goring, Andrew R. A. Conway
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-02-01
Series:Journal of Intelligence
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/9/1/11
_version_ 1797396025576521728
author Ester Navarro
Sara Anne Goring
Andrew R. A. Conway
author_facet Ester Navarro
Sara Anne Goring
Andrew R. A. Conway
author_sort Ester Navarro
collection DOAJ
description Theory of Mind (ToM) is the ability understand that other people’s mental states may be different from one’s own. Psychometric models have shown that individual differences in ToM can largely be attributed to general intelligence (<i>g</i>) (Coyle et al. 2018). Most psychometric models specify <i>g</i> as a reflective latent variable, which is interpreted as a general ability that plays a causal role in a broad range of cognitive tasks, including ToM tasks. However, an alternative approach is to specify <i>g</i> as a formative latent variable, that is, an overall index of cognitive ability that does not represent a psychological attribute (Kovacs and Conway 2016). Here we consider a formative <i>g</i> approach to the relationship between ToM and intelligence. First, we conducted an SEM with reflective <i>g</i> to test the hypothesis that ToM is largely accounted for by a general ability. Next, we conducted a model with formative <i>g</i> to determine whether the relationship between ToM and intelligence is influenced by domain-specific tasks. Finally, we conducted a redundancy analysis to examine the contribution of each <i>g</i> variable. Results suggest that the relationship between ToM and intelligence in this study was influenced by language-based tasks, rather than solely a general ability.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T00:44:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0d8d3ebcbdd14cfa93920a46cc1a1d63
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2079-3200
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T00:44:21Z
publishDate 2021-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Intelligence
spelling doaj.art-0d8d3ebcbdd14cfa93920a46cc1a1d632023-12-11T17:35:06ZengMDPI AGJournal of Intelligence2079-32002021-02-01911110.3390/jintelligence9010011The Relationship between Theory of Mind and Intelligence: A Formative <i>g</i> ApproachEster Navarro0Sara Anne Goring1Andrew R. A. Conway2Division of Behavioral and Organizational Sciences, School of Social Science, Policy and Evaluation, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA 91711, USADivision of Behavioral and Organizational Sciences, School of Social Science, Policy and Evaluation, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA 91711, USADivision of Behavioral and Organizational Sciences, School of Social Science, Policy and Evaluation, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA 91711, USATheory of Mind (ToM) is the ability understand that other people’s mental states may be different from one’s own. Psychometric models have shown that individual differences in ToM can largely be attributed to general intelligence (<i>g</i>) (Coyle et al. 2018). Most psychometric models specify <i>g</i> as a reflective latent variable, which is interpreted as a general ability that plays a causal role in a broad range of cognitive tasks, including ToM tasks. However, an alternative approach is to specify <i>g</i> as a formative latent variable, that is, an overall index of cognitive ability that does not represent a psychological attribute (Kovacs and Conway 2016). Here we consider a formative <i>g</i> approach to the relationship between ToM and intelligence. First, we conducted an SEM with reflective <i>g</i> to test the hypothesis that ToM is largely accounted for by a general ability. Next, we conducted a model with formative <i>g</i> to determine whether the relationship between ToM and intelligence is influenced by domain-specific tasks. Finally, we conducted a redundancy analysis to examine the contribution of each <i>g</i> variable. Results suggest that the relationship between ToM and intelligence in this study was influenced by language-based tasks, rather than solely a general ability.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/9/1/11general intelligencetheory of mindfactor analysisstructural equation modeling
spellingShingle Ester Navarro
Sara Anne Goring
Andrew R. A. Conway
The Relationship between Theory of Mind and Intelligence: A Formative <i>g</i> Approach
Journal of Intelligence
general intelligence
theory of mind
factor analysis
structural equation modeling
title The Relationship between Theory of Mind and Intelligence: A Formative <i>g</i> Approach
title_full The Relationship between Theory of Mind and Intelligence: A Formative <i>g</i> Approach
title_fullStr The Relationship between Theory of Mind and Intelligence: A Formative <i>g</i> Approach
title_full_unstemmed The Relationship between Theory of Mind and Intelligence: A Formative <i>g</i> Approach
title_short The Relationship between Theory of Mind and Intelligence: A Formative <i>g</i> Approach
title_sort relationship between theory of mind and intelligence a formative i g i approach
topic general intelligence
theory of mind
factor analysis
structural equation modeling
url https://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/9/1/11
work_keys_str_mv AT esternavarro therelationshipbetweentheoryofmindandintelligenceaformativeigiapproach
AT saraannegoring therelationshipbetweentheoryofmindandintelligenceaformativeigiapproach
AT andrewraconway therelationshipbetweentheoryofmindandintelligenceaformativeigiapproach
AT esternavarro relationshipbetweentheoryofmindandintelligenceaformativeigiapproach
AT saraannegoring relationshipbetweentheoryofmindandintelligenceaformativeigiapproach
AT andrewraconway relationshipbetweentheoryofmindandintelligenceaformativeigiapproach