Clinical epidemiology and outcomes of patients with gastric intestinal metaplasia in the Los Angeles County System

Abstract Background Gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) is a precursor to gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC). In the United States, there is no consensus on the utility of surveillance for GIM, and minority populations most affected by GAC are understudied. Our aims were to define clinical and endoscopic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Preeti Prakash, Shailavi Jain, Harry Trieu, Kenneth Chow, Deepthi Karunasiri, Tom Liang, Evan Yung, Holli Mason, Hongying Tan, James H. Tabibian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-05-01
Series:BMC Gastroenterology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-023-02797-1
_version_ 1797822780990816256
author Preeti Prakash
Shailavi Jain
Harry Trieu
Kenneth Chow
Deepthi Karunasiri
Tom Liang
Evan Yung
Holli Mason
Hongying Tan
James H. Tabibian
author_facet Preeti Prakash
Shailavi Jain
Harry Trieu
Kenneth Chow
Deepthi Karunasiri
Tom Liang
Evan Yung
Holli Mason
Hongying Tan
James H. Tabibian
author_sort Preeti Prakash
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) is a precursor to gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC). In the United States, there is no consensus on the utility of surveillance for GIM, and minority populations most affected by GAC are understudied. Our aims were to define clinical and endoscopic features, surveillance practices, and outcomes in patients with GIM in a multicenter safety-net system. Methods We identified patients with biopsy-proven GIM between 2016–2020 at the three medical centers comprising Los Angeles County Department of Health Services. Demographics, findings at index esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) first showing GIM, recommended interval for repeat EGD, and findings at repeat EGD were abstracted. Descriptive statistics were performed to characterize our cohort. T-tests and chi-squared (χ2) tests were used to compare patients with and without multifocal GIM. Results There were 342 patients with newly-diagnosed biopsy-proven GIM, 18 (5.2%) of whom had GAC at index EGD. Hispanic patients comprised 71.8% of patients. For most patients (59%), repeat EGD was not recommended. If recommended, 2–3 years was the most common interval. During a median time to repeat EGD of 13 months and cumulative follow-up of 119 patient-years, 29.5% of patients underwent at least one repeat EGD, of whom 14% had multifocal GIM not previously detected. Progression to dysplasia or GAC was not detected in any patients. Conclusion In a predominantly minority population with biopsy-proven GIM, there was a 5% incidence of GAC on index EGD. Though progression to neither dysplasia nor GAC was detected, there was significant variability in endoscopic sampling and surveillance practices.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T10:14:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0dbfa0f6a9cf4eeda7cd58a0bda5d86a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-230X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T10:14:14Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Gastroenterology
spelling doaj.art-0dbfa0f6a9cf4eeda7cd58a0bda5d86a2023-05-21T11:17:47ZengBMCBMC Gastroenterology1471-230X2023-05-012311810.1186/s12876-023-02797-1Clinical epidemiology and outcomes of patients with gastric intestinal metaplasia in the Los Angeles County SystemPreeti Prakash0Shailavi Jain1Harry Trieu2Kenneth Chow3Deepthi Karunasiri4Tom Liang5Evan Yung6Holli Mason7Hongying Tan8James H. Tabibian9David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA)David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA)Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern CaliforniaDepartment of Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical CenterDepartment of Pathology, Olive-View-UCLA Medical CenterDepartment of Pathology, Los Angeles County-University of Southern California Medical CenterDepartment of Pathology, Los Angeles County-University of Southern California Medical CenterDepartment of Pathology, Harbor-UCLA Medical CenterDepartment of Pathology, Olive-View-UCLA Medical CenterDavid Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA)Abstract Background Gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) is a precursor to gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC). In the United States, there is no consensus on the utility of surveillance for GIM, and minority populations most affected by GAC are understudied. Our aims were to define clinical and endoscopic features, surveillance practices, and outcomes in patients with GIM in a multicenter safety-net system. Methods We identified patients with biopsy-proven GIM between 2016–2020 at the three medical centers comprising Los Angeles County Department of Health Services. Demographics, findings at index esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) first showing GIM, recommended interval for repeat EGD, and findings at repeat EGD were abstracted. Descriptive statistics were performed to characterize our cohort. T-tests and chi-squared (χ2) tests were used to compare patients with and without multifocal GIM. Results There were 342 patients with newly-diagnosed biopsy-proven GIM, 18 (5.2%) of whom had GAC at index EGD. Hispanic patients comprised 71.8% of patients. For most patients (59%), repeat EGD was not recommended. If recommended, 2–3 years was the most common interval. During a median time to repeat EGD of 13 months and cumulative follow-up of 119 patient-years, 29.5% of patients underwent at least one repeat EGD, of whom 14% had multifocal GIM not previously detected. Progression to dysplasia or GAC was not detected in any patients. Conclusion In a predominantly minority population with biopsy-proven GIM, there was a 5% incidence of GAC on index EGD. Though progression to neither dysplasia nor GAC was detected, there was significant variability in endoscopic sampling and surveillance practices.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-023-02797-1EndoscopyGastric cancerSurveillanceRisk FactorsDisparities, Healthcare
spellingShingle Preeti Prakash
Shailavi Jain
Harry Trieu
Kenneth Chow
Deepthi Karunasiri
Tom Liang
Evan Yung
Holli Mason
Hongying Tan
James H. Tabibian
Clinical epidemiology and outcomes of patients with gastric intestinal metaplasia in the Los Angeles County System
BMC Gastroenterology
Endoscopy
Gastric cancer
Surveillance
Risk Factors
Disparities, Healthcare
title Clinical epidemiology and outcomes of patients with gastric intestinal metaplasia in the Los Angeles County System
title_full Clinical epidemiology and outcomes of patients with gastric intestinal metaplasia in the Los Angeles County System
title_fullStr Clinical epidemiology and outcomes of patients with gastric intestinal metaplasia in the Los Angeles County System
title_full_unstemmed Clinical epidemiology and outcomes of patients with gastric intestinal metaplasia in the Los Angeles County System
title_short Clinical epidemiology and outcomes of patients with gastric intestinal metaplasia in the Los Angeles County System
title_sort clinical epidemiology and outcomes of patients with gastric intestinal metaplasia in the los angeles county system
topic Endoscopy
Gastric cancer
Surveillance
Risk Factors
Disparities, Healthcare
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-023-02797-1
work_keys_str_mv AT preetiprakash clinicalepidemiologyandoutcomesofpatientswithgastricintestinalmetaplasiainthelosangelescountysystem
AT shailavijain clinicalepidemiologyandoutcomesofpatientswithgastricintestinalmetaplasiainthelosangelescountysystem
AT harrytrieu clinicalepidemiologyandoutcomesofpatientswithgastricintestinalmetaplasiainthelosangelescountysystem
AT kennethchow clinicalepidemiologyandoutcomesofpatientswithgastricintestinalmetaplasiainthelosangelescountysystem
AT deepthikarunasiri clinicalepidemiologyandoutcomesofpatientswithgastricintestinalmetaplasiainthelosangelescountysystem
AT tomliang clinicalepidemiologyandoutcomesofpatientswithgastricintestinalmetaplasiainthelosangelescountysystem
AT evanyung clinicalepidemiologyandoutcomesofpatientswithgastricintestinalmetaplasiainthelosangelescountysystem
AT hollimason clinicalepidemiologyandoutcomesofpatientswithgastricintestinalmetaplasiainthelosangelescountysystem
AT hongyingtan clinicalepidemiologyandoutcomesofpatientswithgastricintestinalmetaplasiainthelosangelescountysystem
AT jameshtabibian clinicalepidemiologyandoutcomesofpatientswithgastricintestinalmetaplasiainthelosangelescountysystem