On the Ends of the Network as a Zone of Friction (And Extraction)

In a world-order where planetary computational networks have restructured nearly all spheres of existence, what is not already networked lies in wait merely as standing-reserve. Today, it seems as if the network and the world are naturally interoperable. Thinking through Harun Farocki’s work...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sudipto Basu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Digital Aesthetics Research Cener 2020-08-01
Series:A Peer-Reviewed Journal About
Subjects:
Online Access:https://aprja.net//article/view/121486
_version_ 1797666410435969024
author Sudipto Basu
author_facet Sudipto Basu
author_sort Sudipto Basu
collection DOAJ
description In a world-order where planetary computational networks have restructured nearly all spheres of existence, what is not already networked lies in wait merely as standing-reserve. Today, it seems as if the network and the world are naturally interoperable. Thinking through Harun Farocki’s work on operational images, I however locate a zone of friction or incommensurability between the network and the world. Revisiting Norbert Wiener’s anti-aircraft predictor – a founding episode in the history of cybernetics – I show how this gap was bridged by a logic of (en)closures that reduced the living human form and the world to narrow operational ends; banishing the openness and indeterminacy of both life and nature into undesirable contingency. However, cybernetics’ relentless expansion into a universal episteme and planetary infrastructure since the Cold war necessarily floods the network with contingency; which it wards off by feeding on a disavowed living labor. I argue that this living labor is an uneasy reconciliation of mechanism and vitalism, which we may call habits. Drawing on the Marxian notion of general intellect, I posit how habits are key to generating network surplus value, and to cybernetic expansionism. Habits shape, prepare the outside for its subsumption into the network. Yet they are not given the status of productive activity, and consequently disavowed and vaporized by networks. I propose that this living labor be given a specific name – interfacing – and, following Georges Bataille’s critique of political economy, speculate on the reasons for its disavowal. Drawing on Bataille’s idea of the general in ‘general economy’ (that which is opposed to utilitarian or operational ends) and Hito Steyerl’s How Not to Be Seen, I try to imagine what an interface contiguous with the general intellect might be.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T19:58:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0dd8b848265c46759e9c388e736eff63
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2245-7755
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T19:58:08Z
publishDate 2020-08-01
publisher Digital Aesthetics Research Cener
record_format Article
series A Peer-Reviewed Journal About
spelling doaj.art-0dd8b848265c46759e9c388e736eff632023-10-04T12:47:42ZengDigital Aesthetics Research CenerA Peer-Reviewed Journal About2245-77552020-08-019110.7146/aprja.v9i1.121486On the Ends of the Network as a Zone of Friction (And Extraction)Sudipto Basu In a world-order where planetary computational networks have restructured nearly all spheres of existence, what is not already networked lies in wait merely as standing-reserve. Today, it seems as if the network and the world are naturally interoperable. Thinking through Harun Farocki’s work on operational images, I however locate a zone of friction or incommensurability between the network and the world. Revisiting Norbert Wiener’s anti-aircraft predictor – a founding episode in the history of cybernetics – I show how this gap was bridged by a logic of (en)closures that reduced the living human form and the world to narrow operational ends; banishing the openness and indeterminacy of both life and nature into undesirable contingency. However, cybernetics’ relentless expansion into a universal episteme and planetary infrastructure since the Cold war necessarily floods the network with contingency; which it wards off by feeding on a disavowed living labor. I argue that this living labor is an uneasy reconciliation of mechanism and vitalism, which we may call habits. Drawing on the Marxian notion of general intellect, I posit how habits are key to generating network surplus value, and to cybernetic expansionism. Habits shape, prepare the outside for its subsumption into the network. Yet they are not given the status of productive activity, and consequently disavowed and vaporized by networks. I propose that this living labor be given a specific name – interfacing – and, following Georges Bataille’s critique of political economy, speculate on the reasons for its disavowal. Drawing on Bataille’s idea of the general in ‘general economy’ (that which is opposed to utilitarian or operational ends) and Hito Steyerl’s How Not to Be Seen, I try to imagine what an interface contiguous with the general intellect might be. https://aprja.net//article/view/121486Operational imagenetwork extractivismhabitsgeneral intellectinterfacegeneral economy
spellingShingle Sudipto Basu
On the Ends of the Network as a Zone of Friction (And Extraction)
A Peer-Reviewed Journal About
Operational image
network extractivism
habits
general intellect
interface
general economy
title On the Ends of the Network as a Zone of Friction (And Extraction)
title_full On the Ends of the Network as a Zone of Friction (And Extraction)
title_fullStr On the Ends of the Network as a Zone of Friction (And Extraction)
title_full_unstemmed On the Ends of the Network as a Zone of Friction (And Extraction)
title_short On the Ends of the Network as a Zone of Friction (And Extraction)
title_sort on the ends of the network as a zone of friction and extraction
topic Operational image
network extractivism
habits
general intellect
interface
general economy
url https://aprja.net//article/view/121486
work_keys_str_mv AT sudiptobasu ontheendsofthenetworkasazoneoffrictionandextraction