The effects of time of day and chronotype on cognitive and physical performance in healthy volunteers
Abstract Background Whether you are a morning lark or a night owl has proven to be a key contributor in the timing of peak athletic performance. Recent evidence suggests that accounting for these differences, known as one’s chronotype, results in significantly different diurnal performance profiles....
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2018-10-01
|
Series: | Sports Medicine - Open |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40798-018-0162-z |
_version_ | 1818195199578341376 |
---|---|
author | Elise R. Facer-Childs Sophie Boiling George M. Balanos |
author_facet | Elise R. Facer-Childs Sophie Boiling George M. Balanos |
author_sort | Elise R. Facer-Childs |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background Whether you are a morning lark or a night owl has proven to be a key contributor in the timing of peak athletic performance. Recent evidence suggests that accounting for these differences, known as one’s chronotype, results in significantly different diurnal performance profiles. However, there is limited research investigating multiple measures of performance simultaneously over the course of a socially constrained day. Objectives This study aimed to investigate the impact of chronotype on indices of cognitive and physical performance at different times of day in healthy volunteers. Methods We recruited 56 healthy individuals categorised as early (ECT, n = 25) or late (LCT, n = 31) chronotypes using the Munich ChronoType Questionnaire, circadian phase markers and objective actigraphy. Measures of cognitive and physical performance, along with self-reported daytime sleepiness, were taken at multiple times of day (14:00 h, 20:00 h and 08:00 h the following morning). Results Here, we find significantly different diurnal variation profiles between ECTs and LCTs, for daytime sleepiness, psychomotor vigilance, executive function and isometric grip strength. LCTs were significantly impaired in all measures in the morning compared to ECTs. Conclusion Our results provide evidence to support the notion that ‘night owls’ are compromised earlier in the day. We offer new insight into how differences in habitual sleep patterns and circadian rhythms impact cognitive and physical measures of performance. These findings may have implications for the sports world, e.g. athletes, coaches and teams, who are constantly looking for ways to minimise performance deficits and maximise performance gains. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-12T01:14:24Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-0decd82b7b3649b8a7221d65f6712d0d |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2199-1170 2198-9761 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-12T01:14:24Z |
publishDate | 2018-10-01 |
publisher | SpringerOpen |
record_format | Article |
series | Sports Medicine - Open |
spelling | doaj.art-0decd82b7b3649b8a7221d65f6712d0d2022-12-22T00:43:23ZengSpringerOpenSports Medicine - Open2199-11702198-97612018-10-014111210.1186/s40798-018-0162-zThe effects of time of day and chronotype on cognitive and physical performance in healthy volunteersElise R. Facer-Childs0Sophie Boiling1George M. Balanos2School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of BirminghamSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of BirminghamSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of BirminghamAbstract Background Whether you are a morning lark or a night owl has proven to be a key contributor in the timing of peak athletic performance. Recent evidence suggests that accounting for these differences, known as one’s chronotype, results in significantly different diurnal performance profiles. However, there is limited research investigating multiple measures of performance simultaneously over the course of a socially constrained day. Objectives This study aimed to investigate the impact of chronotype on indices of cognitive and physical performance at different times of day in healthy volunteers. Methods We recruited 56 healthy individuals categorised as early (ECT, n = 25) or late (LCT, n = 31) chronotypes using the Munich ChronoType Questionnaire, circadian phase markers and objective actigraphy. Measures of cognitive and physical performance, along with self-reported daytime sleepiness, were taken at multiple times of day (14:00 h, 20:00 h and 08:00 h the following morning). Results Here, we find significantly different diurnal variation profiles between ECTs and LCTs, for daytime sleepiness, psychomotor vigilance, executive function and isometric grip strength. LCTs were significantly impaired in all measures in the morning compared to ECTs. Conclusion Our results provide evidence to support the notion that ‘night owls’ are compromised earlier in the day. We offer new insight into how differences in habitual sleep patterns and circadian rhythms impact cognitive and physical measures of performance. These findings may have implications for the sports world, e.g. athletes, coaches and teams, who are constantly looking for ways to minimise performance deficits and maximise performance gains.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40798-018-0162-zDiurnal variationChronotypePerformanceAthletesSportsCircadian rhythms |
spellingShingle | Elise R. Facer-Childs Sophie Boiling George M. Balanos The effects of time of day and chronotype on cognitive and physical performance in healthy volunteers Sports Medicine - Open Diurnal variation Chronotype Performance Athletes Sports Circadian rhythms |
title | The effects of time of day and chronotype on cognitive and physical performance in healthy volunteers |
title_full | The effects of time of day and chronotype on cognitive and physical performance in healthy volunteers |
title_fullStr | The effects of time of day and chronotype on cognitive and physical performance in healthy volunteers |
title_full_unstemmed | The effects of time of day and chronotype on cognitive and physical performance in healthy volunteers |
title_short | The effects of time of day and chronotype on cognitive and physical performance in healthy volunteers |
title_sort | effects of time of day and chronotype on cognitive and physical performance in healthy volunteers |
topic | Diurnal variation Chronotype Performance Athletes Sports Circadian rhythms |
url | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40798-018-0162-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eliserfacerchilds theeffectsoftimeofdayandchronotypeoncognitiveandphysicalperformanceinhealthyvolunteers AT sophieboiling theeffectsoftimeofdayandchronotypeoncognitiveandphysicalperformanceinhealthyvolunteers AT georgembalanos theeffectsoftimeofdayandchronotypeoncognitiveandphysicalperformanceinhealthyvolunteers AT eliserfacerchilds effectsoftimeofdayandchronotypeoncognitiveandphysicalperformanceinhealthyvolunteers AT sophieboiling effectsoftimeofdayandchronotypeoncognitiveandphysicalperformanceinhealthyvolunteers AT georgembalanos effectsoftimeofdayandchronotypeoncognitiveandphysicalperformanceinhealthyvolunteers |