Actor/observer asymmetry in risky decision making

Are people willing to gamble more for themselves than what they deem reasonable for others? We addressed this question in a simplified computer gambling task in which subjects chose from a set of 10 cards. Subjects selected one card at a time after being instructed that 9 cards were good (win a doll...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Diego Fernandez-Duque, Timothy Wifall
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2007-02-01
Series:Judgment and Decision Making
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S193029750000022X/type/journal_article
_version_ 1827827238362415104
author Diego Fernandez-Duque
Timothy Wifall
author_facet Diego Fernandez-Duque
Timothy Wifall
author_sort Diego Fernandez-Duque
collection DOAJ
description Are people willing to gamble more for themselves than what they deem reasonable for others? We addressed this question in a simplified computer gambling task in which subjects chose from a set of 10 cards. Subjects selected one card at a time after being instructed that 9 cards were good (win a dollar per card) and one was really bad (lose all the money and end the game). Subjects could stop playing at any time to collect their winnings. Some subjects played the game, others observed a confederate. Both groups took risks beyond what was rational (i.e., 5 cards) but actors were riskier than observers. The actor/observer asymmetry occurred even after controlling for monetary outcome (i.e., having observers win prizes) and after controlling for how the question was framed (i.e., asking observers what they themselves would do as opposed to what the confederate should do). We discuss these results in relation to theories of decision making that emphasize separate contributions of rational and experiential systems.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T03:24:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0e030373370e47c9bac67a8322486ca0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1930-2975
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T03:24:40Z
publishDate 2007-02-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Judgment and Decision Making
spelling doaj.art-0e030373370e47c9bac67a8322486ca02023-09-03T13:42:58ZengCambridge University PressJudgment and Decision Making1930-29752007-02-0121810.1017/S193029750000022XActor/observer asymmetry in risky decision makingDiego Fernandez-Duque0Timothy Wifall1Department of Psychology, Villanova UniversityDepartment of Psychology, Villanova UniversityAre people willing to gamble more for themselves than what they deem reasonable for others? We addressed this question in a simplified computer gambling task in which subjects chose from a set of 10 cards. Subjects selected one card at a time after being instructed that 9 cards were good (win a dollar per card) and one was really bad (lose all the money and end the game). Subjects could stop playing at any time to collect their winnings. Some subjects played the game, others observed a confederate. Both groups took risks beyond what was rational (i.e., 5 cards) but actors were riskier than observers. The actor/observer asymmetry occurred even after controlling for monetary outcome (i.e., having observers win prizes) and after controlling for how the question was framed (i.e., asking observers what they themselves would do as opposed to what the confederate should do). We discuss these results in relation to theories of decision making that emphasize separate contributions of rational and experiential systems.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S193029750000022X/type/journal_articlemetacognitiongamblingaffect
spellingShingle Diego Fernandez-Duque
Timothy Wifall
Actor/observer asymmetry in risky decision making
Judgment and Decision Making
metacognition
gambling
affect
title Actor/observer asymmetry in risky decision making
title_full Actor/observer asymmetry in risky decision making
title_fullStr Actor/observer asymmetry in risky decision making
title_full_unstemmed Actor/observer asymmetry in risky decision making
title_short Actor/observer asymmetry in risky decision making
title_sort actor observer asymmetry in risky decision making
topic metacognition
gambling
affect
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S193029750000022X/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT diegofernandezduque actorobserverasymmetryinriskydecisionmaking
AT timothywifall actorobserverasymmetryinriskydecisionmaking