Cross-checking different sources of mobility information.

The pervasive use of new mobile devices has allowed a better characterization in space and time of human concentrations and mobility in general. Besides its theoretical interest, describing mobility is of great importance for a number of practical applications ranging from the forecast of disease sp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maxime Lenormand, Miguel Picornell, Oliva G Cantú-Ros, Antònia Tugores, Thomas Louail, Ricardo Herranz, Marc Barthelemy, Enrique Frías-Martínez, José J Ramasco
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4136853?pdf=render
_version_ 1819195541840461824
author Maxime Lenormand
Miguel Picornell
Oliva G Cantú-Ros
Antònia Tugores
Thomas Louail
Ricardo Herranz
Marc Barthelemy
Enrique Frías-Martínez
José J Ramasco
author_facet Maxime Lenormand
Miguel Picornell
Oliva G Cantú-Ros
Antònia Tugores
Thomas Louail
Ricardo Herranz
Marc Barthelemy
Enrique Frías-Martínez
José J Ramasco
author_sort Maxime Lenormand
collection DOAJ
description The pervasive use of new mobile devices has allowed a better characterization in space and time of human concentrations and mobility in general. Besides its theoretical interest, describing mobility is of great importance for a number of practical applications ranging from the forecast of disease spreading to the design of new spaces in urban environments. While classical data sources, such as surveys or census, have a limited level of geographical resolution (e.g., districts, municipalities, counties are typically used) or are restricted to generic workdays or weekends, the data coming from mobile devices can be precisely located both in time and space. Most previous works have used a single data source to study human mobility patterns. Here we perform instead a cross-check analysis by comparing results obtained with data collected from three different sources: Twitter, census, and cell phones. The analysis is focused on the urban areas of Barcelona and Madrid, for which data of the three types is available. We assess the correlation between the datasets on different aspects: the spatial distribution of people concentration, the temporal evolution of people density, and the mobility patterns of individuals. Our results show that the three data sources are providing comparable information. Even though the representativeness of Twitter geolocated data is lower than that of mobile phone and census data, the correlations between the population density profiles and mobility patterns detected by the three datasets are close to one in a grid with cells of 2×2 and 1×1 square kilometers. This level of correlation supports the feasibility of interchanging the three data sources at the spatio-temporal scales considered.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T02:14:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0e11a23771fd4b97b45b8a89c7d1cf30
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T02:14:24Z
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-0e11a23771fd4b97b45b8a89c7d1cf302022-12-21T18:03:41ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0198e10518410.1371/journal.pone.0105184Cross-checking different sources of mobility information.Maxime LenormandMiguel PicornellOliva G Cantú-RosAntònia TugoresThomas LouailRicardo HerranzMarc BarthelemyEnrique Frías-MartínezJosé J RamascoThe pervasive use of new mobile devices has allowed a better characterization in space and time of human concentrations and mobility in general. Besides its theoretical interest, describing mobility is of great importance for a number of practical applications ranging from the forecast of disease spreading to the design of new spaces in urban environments. While classical data sources, such as surveys or census, have a limited level of geographical resolution (e.g., districts, municipalities, counties are typically used) or are restricted to generic workdays or weekends, the data coming from mobile devices can be precisely located both in time and space. Most previous works have used a single data source to study human mobility patterns. Here we perform instead a cross-check analysis by comparing results obtained with data collected from three different sources: Twitter, census, and cell phones. The analysis is focused on the urban areas of Barcelona and Madrid, for which data of the three types is available. We assess the correlation between the datasets on different aspects: the spatial distribution of people concentration, the temporal evolution of people density, and the mobility patterns of individuals. Our results show that the three data sources are providing comparable information. Even though the representativeness of Twitter geolocated data is lower than that of mobile phone and census data, the correlations between the population density profiles and mobility patterns detected by the three datasets are close to one in a grid with cells of 2×2 and 1×1 square kilometers. This level of correlation supports the feasibility of interchanging the three data sources at the spatio-temporal scales considered.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4136853?pdf=render
spellingShingle Maxime Lenormand
Miguel Picornell
Oliva G Cantú-Ros
Antònia Tugores
Thomas Louail
Ricardo Herranz
Marc Barthelemy
Enrique Frías-Martínez
José J Ramasco
Cross-checking different sources of mobility information.
PLoS ONE
title Cross-checking different sources of mobility information.
title_full Cross-checking different sources of mobility information.
title_fullStr Cross-checking different sources of mobility information.
title_full_unstemmed Cross-checking different sources of mobility information.
title_short Cross-checking different sources of mobility information.
title_sort cross checking different sources of mobility information
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4136853?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT maximelenormand crosscheckingdifferentsourcesofmobilityinformation
AT miguelpicornell crosscheckingdifferentsourcesofmobilityinformation
AT olivagcanturos crosscheckingdifferentsourcesofmobilityinformation
AT antoniatugores crosscheckingdifferentsourcesofmobilityinformation
AT thomaslouail crosscheckingdifferentsourcesofmobilityinformation
AT ricardoherranz crosscheckingdifferentsourcesofmobilityinformation
AT marcbarthelemy crosscheckingdifferentsourcesofmobilityinformation
AT enriquefriasmartinez crosscheckingdifferentsourcesofmobilityinformation
AT josejramasco crosscheckingdifferentsourcesofmobilityinformation