Comparison of statistical and analytical hierarchy process methods on flood susceptibility mapping: In a case study of the Lake Tana sub-basin in northwestern Ethiopia

The flood is one of the frequently occurring natural hazards within the sub-basin of Lake Tana. The flood hazard within the sub-basin of Lake Tana causes damage to cropland, properties, and a fatality every season. Therefore, flood susceptibility modeling in this area is significant for hazard reduc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wubalem Azemeraw, Tesfaw Gashaw, Dawit Zerihun, Getahun Belete, Mekuria Tamrat, Jothimani Muralitharan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2021-12-01
Series:Open Geosciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2020-0329
_version_ 1818322792005763072
author Wubalem Azemeraw
Tesfaw Gashaw
Dawit Zerihun
Getahun Belete
Mekuria Tamrat
Jothimani Muralitharan
author_facet Wubalem Azemeraw
Tesfaw Gashaw
Dawit Zerihun
Getahun Belete
Mekuria Tamrat
Jothimani Muralitharan
author_sort Wubalem Azemeraw
collection DOAJ
description The flood is one of the frequently occurring natural hazards within the sub-basin of Lake Tana. The flood hazard within the sub-basin of Lake Tana causes damage to cropland, properties, and a fatality every season. Therefore, flood susceptibility modeling in this area is significant for hazard reduction and management purposes. Thus, the analytical hierarchy process (AHP), bivariate (information value [IV] and frequency ratio [FR]), and multivariate (logistic regression [LR]) statistical methods were applied. Using an intensive field survey, historical document, and Google Earth Imagery, 1,404-flood locations were determined, classified into 70% training datasets and 30% testing flood datasets using a subset within the geographic information system (GIS) environment. The statistical relationship between the probability of flood occurrence and 11 flood-driving factors was performed using the GIS tool. The flood susceptibility maps of the study area were developed by summing all weighted aspects using a raster calculator. It is classified into very low, low, moderate, high, and very high susceptibility classes using the natural breaks method. The accuracy and performance of the models were evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC). As the result indicated, the FR model has better performance (AUC = 99.1%) compared to the AHP model (AUC = 86.9%), LR model (AUC = 81.4%), and IV model (AUC = 78.2%). This research finds out that the applied methods are quite worthy for flood susceptibility modeling within the study area. In flood susceptibility modeling, method selection is not a serious challenge; the care should tend to the input parameter quality. Based on the AUC values, the FR model is comparatively better, followed by the AHP model for regional land use planning, flood hazard mitigation, and prevention purposes.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T11:02:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0e16ab042f9f4f44a5762883aca6ac86
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2391-5447
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T11:02:25Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher De Gruyter
record_format Article
series Open Geosciences
spelling doaj.art-0e16ab042f9f4f44a5762883aca6ac862022-12-21T23:49:12ZengDe GruyterOpen Geosciences2391-54472021-12-011311668168810.1515/geo-2020-0329Comparison of statistical and analytical hierarchy process methods on flood susceptibility mapping: In a case study of the Lake Tana sub-basin in northwestern EthiopiaWubalem Azemeraw0Tesfaw Gashaw1Dawit Zerihun2Getahun Belete3Mekuria Tamrat4Jothimani Muralitharan5Department of Geology, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, University of Gondar, P.O. BOX 196, Maraki Street, EthiopiaDepartment of Geology, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, University of Gondar, P.O. BOX 196, Maraki Street, EthiopiaDepartment of Geology, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, University of Gondar, P.O. BOX 196, Maraki Street, EthiopiaDepartment of Geology, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, University of Gondar, P.O. BOX 196, Maraki Street, EthiopiaDepartment of Geology, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, University of Gondar, P.O. BOX 196, Maraki Street, EthiopiaDepartment of Geology, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, University of Gondar, P.O. BOX 196, Maraki Street, EthiopiaThe flood is one of the frequently occurring natural hazards within the sub-basin of Lake Tana. The flood hazard within the sub-basin of Lake Tana causes damage to cropland, properties, and a fatality every season. Therefore, flood susceptibility modeling in this area is significant for hazard reduction and management purposes. Thus, the analytical hierarchy process (AHP), bivariate (information value [IV] and frequency ratio [FR]), and multivariate (logistic regression [LR]) statistical methods were applied. Using an intensive field survey, historical document, and Google Earth Imagery, 1,404-flood locations were determined, classified into 70% training datasets and 30% testing flood datasets using a subset within the geographic information system (GIS) environment. The statistical relationship between the probability of flood occurrence and 11 flood-driving factors was performed using the GIS tool. The flood susceptibility maps of the study area were developed by summing all weighted aspects using a raster calculator. It is classified into very low, low, moderate, high, and very high susceptibility classes using the natural breaks method. The accuracy and performance of the models were evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC). As the result indicated, the FR model has better performance (AUC = 99.1%) compared to the AHP model (AUC = 86.9%), LR model (AUC = 81.4%), and IV model (AUC = 78.2%). This research finds out that the applied methods are quite worthy for flood susceptibility modeling within the study area. In flood susceptibility modeling, method selection is not a serious challenge; the care should tend to the input parameter quality. Based on the AUC values, the FR model is comparatively better, followed by the AHP model for regional land use planning, flood hazard mitigation, and prevention purposes.https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2020-0329gumararibbinventorygeographic information system
spellingShingle Wubalem Azemeraw
Tesfaw Gashaw
Dawit Zerihun
Getahun Belete
Mekuria Tamrat
Jothimani Muralitharan
Comparison of statistical and analytical hierarchy process methods on flood susceptibility mapping: In a case study of the Lake Tana sub-basin in northwestern Ethiopia
Open Geosciences
gumara
ribb
inventory
geographic information system
title Comparison of statistical and analytical hierarchy process methods on flood susceptibility mapping: In a case study of the Lake Tana sub-basin in northwestern Ethiopia
title_full Comparison of statistical and analytical hierarchy process methods on flood susceptibility mapping: In a case study of the Lake Tana sub-basin in northwestern Ethiopia
title_fullStr Comparison of statistical and analytical hierarchy process methods on flood susceptibility mapping: In a case study of the Lake Tana sub-basin in northwestern Ethiopia
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of statistical and analytical hierarchy process methods on flood susceptibility mapping: In a case study of the Lake Tana sub-basin in northwestern Ethiopia
title_short Comparison of statistical and analytical hierarchy process methods on flood susceptibility mapping: In a case study of the Lake Tana sub-basin in northwestern Ethiopia
title_sort comparison of statistical and analytical hierarchy process methods on flood susceptibility mapping in a case study of the lake tana sub basin in northwestern ethiopia
topic gumara
ribb
inventory
geographic information system
url https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2020-0329
work_keys_str_mv AT wubalemazemeraw comparisonofstatisticalandanalyticalhierarchyprocessmethodsonfloodsusceptibilitymappinginacasestudyofthelaketanasubbasininnorthwesternethiopia
AT tesfawgashaw comparisonofstatisticalandanalyticalhierarchyprocessmethodsonfloodsusceptibilitymappinginacasestudyofthelaketanasubbasininnorthwesternethiopia
AT dawitzerihun comparisonofstatisticalandanalyticalhierarchyprocessmethodsonfloodsusceptibilitymappinginacasestudyofthelaketanasubbasininnorthwesternethiopia
AT getahunbelete comparisonofstatisticalandanalyticalhierarchyprocessmethodsonfloodsusceptibilitymappinginacasestudyofthelaketanasubbasininnorthwesternethiopia
AT mekuriatamrat comparisonofstatisticalandanalyticalhierarchyprocessmethodsonfloodsusceptibilitymappinginacasestudyofthelaketanasubbasininnorthwesternethiopia
AT jothimanimuralitharan comparisonofstatisticalandanalyticalhierarchyprocessmethodsonfloodsusceptibilitymappinginacasestudyofthelaketanasubbasininnorthwesternethiopia