Performance evaluation of SimPET-L and SimPET-XL: MRI-compatible small-animal PET systems with rat-body imaging capability

Abstract Background SimPET-L and SimPET-XL have recently been introduced with increased transaxial fields of view (FOV) compared with their predecessors (SimPET™ and SimPET-X), enabling whole-body positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of rats. We conducted performance evaluations of SimPET-L an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Minjee Seo, Guen Bae Ko, Kyeong Yun Kim, Jeong-Whan Son, Jung Woo Byun, Yun-Sang Lee, Kyeong Min Kim, Jang Woo Park, Kipom Kim, Taekwan Lee, Jae Sung Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2023-03-01
Series:EJNMMI Physics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-023-00534-x
_version_ 1797863442748538880
author Minjee Seo
Guen Bae Ko
Kyeong Yun Kim
Jeong-Whan Son
Jung Woo Byun
Yun-Sang Lee
Kyeong Min Kim
Jang Woo Park
Kipom Kim
Taekwan Lee
Jae Sung Lee
author_facet Minjee Seo
Guen Bae Ko
Kyeong Yun Kim
Jeong-Whan Son
Jung Woo Byun
Yun-Sang Lee
Kyeong Min Kim
Jang Woo Park
Kipom Kim
Taekwan Lee
Jae Sung Lee
author_sort Minjee Seo
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background SimPET-L and SimPET-XL have recently been introduced with increased transaxial fields of view (FOV) compared with their predecessors (SimPET™ and SimPET-X), enabling whole-body positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of rats. We conducted performance evaluations of SimPET-L and SimPET-XL and rat-body imaging with SimPET-XL to demonstrate the benefits of increased axial and transaxial FOVs. Procedures The detector blocks in SimPET-L and SimPET-XL consist of two 4 × 4 silicon photomultiplier arrays coupled with 20 × 9 array lutetium oxyorthosilicate crystals. SimPET-L and SimPET-XL have an inner diameter (bore size) of 7.6 cm, and they are composed of 40 and 80 detector blocks yielding axial lengths of 5.5 and 11 cm, respectively. Each system was evaluated according to the National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU4-2008 protocol. Rat imaging studies, such as 18F-NaF and 18F-FDG PET, were performed using SimPET-XL. Results The radial resolutions at the axial center measured using the filtered back projection, 3D ordered-subset expectation maximization (OSEM), and 3D OSEM with point spread functions correction were 1.7, 0.82, and 0.82 mm FWHM in SimPET-L and 1.7, 0.91, and 0.91 mm FWHM in SimPET-XL, respectively. The peak sensitivities of SimPET-L and SimPET-XL were 6.30% and 10.4% for an energy window of 100–900 keV and 4.44% and 7.25% for a window of 250–750 keV, respectively. The peak noise equivalent count rate with an energy window of 250–750 keV was 249 kcps at 44.9 MBq for SimPET-L and 349 kcps at 31.3 MBq for SimPET-XL. In SimPET-L, the uniformity was 4.43%, and the spill-over ratios in air- and water-filled chambers were 5.54% and 4.10%, respectively. In SimPET-XL, the uniformity was 3.89%, and the spill-over ratio in the air- and water-filled chambers were 3.56% and 3.60%. Moreover, SimPET-XL provided high-quality images of rats. Conclusion SimPET-L and SimPET-XL show adequate performance compared with other SimPET systems. In addition, their large transaxial and long axial FOVs provide imaging capability for rats with high image quality.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T22:36:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0e17c72a6f754893a62a3f27b7a9f2e2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2197-7364
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T22:36:46Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series EJNMMI Physics
spelling doaj.art-0e17c72a6f754893a62a3f27b7a9f2e22023-03-22T12:25:26ZengSpringerOpenEJNMMI Physics2197-73642023-03-0110111010.1186/s40658-023-00534-xPerformance evaluation of SimPET-L and SimPET-XL: MRI-compatible small-animal PET systems with rat-body imaging capabilityMinjee Seo0Guen Bae Ko1Kyeong Yun Kim2Jeong-Whan Son3Jung Woo Byun4Yun-Sang Lee5Kyeong Min Kim6Jang Woo Park7Kipom Kim8Taekwan Lee9Jae Sung Lee10Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of MedicineBrightonix Imaging Inc.Brightonix Imaging Inc.Brightonix Imaging Inc.Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University College of MedicineDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University College of MedicineKorea Institute of Radiological and Medical SciencesKorea Institute of Radiological and Medical SciencesBrain Research Core Facility, Korea Brain Research InstituteBrain Research Core Facility, Korea Brain Research InstituteDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of MedicineAbstract Background SimPET-L and SimPET-XL have recently been introduced with increased transaxial fields of view (FOV) compared with their predecessors (SimPET™ and SimPET-X), enabling whole-body positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of rats. We conducted performance evaluations of SimPET-L and SimPET-XL and rat-body imaging with SimPET-XL to demonstrate the benefits of increased axial and transaxial FOVs. Procedures The detector blocks in SimPET-L and SimPET-XL consist of two 4 × 4 silicon photomultiplier arrays coupled with 20 × 9 array lutetium oxyorthosilicate crystals. SimPET-L and SimPET-XL have an inner diameter (bore size) of 7.6 cm, and they are composed of 40 and 80 detector blocks yielding axial lengths of 5.5 and 11 cm, respectively. Each system was evaluated according to the National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU4-2008 protocol. Rat imaging studies, such as 18F-NaF and 18F-FDG PET, were performed using SimPET-XL. Results The radial resolutions at the axial center measured using the filtered back projection, 3D ordered-subset expectation maximization (OSEM), and 3D OSEM with point spread functions correction were 1.7, 0.82, and 0.82 mm FWHM in SimPET-L and 1.7, 0.91, and 0.91 mm FWHM in SimPET-XL, respectively. The peak sensitivities of SimPET-L and SimPET-XL were 6.30% and 10.4% for an energy window of 100–900 keV and 4.44% and 7.25% for a window of 250–750 keV, respectively. The peak noise equivalent count rate with an energy window of 250–750 keV was 249 kcps at 44.9 MBq for SimPET-L and 349 kcps at 31.3 MBq for SimPET-XL. In SimPET-L, the uniformity was 4.43%, and the spill-over ratios in air- and water-filled chambers were 5.54% and 4.10%, respectively. In SimPET-XL, the uniformity was 3.89%, and the spill-over ratio in the air- and water-filled chambers were 3.56% and 3.60%. Moreover, SimPET-XL provided high-quality images of rats. Conclusion SimPET-L and SimPET-XL show adequate performance compared with other SimPET systems. In addition, their large transaxial and long axial FOVs provide imaging capability for rats with high image quality.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-023-00534-xPET/MRIMolecular imagingNEMA performanceInstrumentation
spellingShingle Minjee Seo
Guen Bae Ko
Kyeong Yun Kim
Jeong-Whan Son
Jung Woo Byun
Yun-Sang Lee
Kyeong Min Kim
Jang Woo Park
Kipom Kim
Taekwan Lee
Jae Sung Lee
Performance evaluation of SimPET-L and SimPET-XL: MRI-compatible small-animal PET systems with rat-body imaging capability
EJNMMI Physics
PET/MRI
Molecular imaging
NEMA performance
Instrumentation
title Performance evaluation of SimPET-L and SimPET-XL: MRI-compatible small-animal PET systems with rat-body imaging capability
title_full Performance evaluation of SimPET-L and SimPET-XL: MRI-compatible small-animal PET systems with rat-body imaging capability
title_fullStr Performance evaluation of SimPET-L and SimPET-XL: MRI-compatible small-animal PET systems with rat-body imaging capability
title_full_unstemmed Performance evaluation of SimPET-L and SimPET-XL: MRI-compatible small-animal PET systems with rat-body imaging capability
title_short Performance evaluation of SimPET-L and SimPET-XL: MRI-compatible small-animal PET systems with rat-body imaging capability
title_sort performance evaluation of simpet l and simpet xl mri compatible small animal pet systems with rat body imaging capability
topic PET/MRI
Molecular imaging
NEMA performance
Instrumentation
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-023-00534-x
work_keys_str_mv AT minjeeseo performanceevaluationofsimpetlandsimpetxlmricompatiblesmallanimalpetsystemswithratbodyimagingcapability
AT guenbaeko performanceevaluationofsimpetlandsimpetxlmricompatiblesmallanimalpetsystemswithratbodyimagingcapability
AT kyeongyunkim performanceevaluationofsimpetlandsimpetxlmricompatiblesmallanimalpetsystemswithratbodyimagingcapability
AT jeongwhanson performanceevaluationofsimpetlandsimpetxlmricompatiblesmallanimalpetsystemswithratbodyimagingcapability
AT jungwoobyun performanceevaluationofsimpetlandsimpetxlmricompatiblesmallanimalpetsystemswithratbodyimagingcapability
AT yunsanglee performanceevaluationofsimpetlandsimpetxlmricompatiblesmallanimalpetsystemswithratbodyimagingcapability
AT kyeongminkim performanceevaluationofsimpetlandsimpetxlmricompatiblesmallanimalpetsystemswithratbodyimagingcapability
AT jangwoopark performanceevaluationofsimpetlandsimpetxlmricompatiblesmallanimalpetsystemswithratbodyimagingcapability
AT kipomkim performanceevaluationofsimpetlandsimpetxlmricompatiblesmallanimalpetsystemswithratbodyimagingcapability
AT taekwanlee performanceevaluationofsimpetlandsimpetxlmricompatiblesmallanimalpetsystemswithratbodyimagingcapability
AT jaesunglee performanceevaluationofsimpetlandsimpetxlmricompatiblesmallanimalpetsystemswithratbodyimagingcapability