Dryland maize yield potentials and constraints: A case study in western Kansas

Abstract Water‐limited environments account for half of the earth's land surface, and dryland agriculture acreage is projected to expand due to climate changes. Examining typical dryland yield potentials and yield improvement measures is crucial for developing future dryland crop production sys...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shuang Sun, Xiaomao Lin, Gretchen F. Sassenrath, Ignacio Ciampitti, Prasanna Gowda, Qing Ye, Xiaoguang Yang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-02-01
Series:Food and Energy Security
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.328
_version_ 1824044210629640192
author Shuang Sun
Xiaomao Lin
Gretchen F. Sassenrath
Ignacio Ciampitti
Prasanna Gowda
Qing Ye
Xiaoguang Yang
author_facet Shuang Sun
Xiaomao Lin
Gretchen F. Sassenrath
Ignacio Ciampitti
Prasanna Gowda
Qing Ye
Xiaoguang Yang
author_sort Shuang Sun
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Water‐limited environments account for half of the earth's land surface, and dryland agriculture acreage is projected to expand due to climate changes. Examining typical dryland yield potentials and yield improvement measures is crucial for developing future dryland crop production systems. This case study used crop modeling to analyze dryland maize yield potential (YPd), farmers’ yield potential (YPf), and actual farm yields (Ya) from 1990 to 2015 in three counties in western Kansas (i.e., Thomas, Greeley, and Finney in the U.S. Great Plains region). The calibrated APSIM‐Maize model along with actual yields was used to estimate yield gaps attributed to: (a) agronomic factors (YG1 = YPd − YPf) and (b) socioeconomic constraints (YG2 = YPf − Ya). Observed climate conditions during maize‐growing seasons showed warming, brightening, and drying trends for all three counties in western Kansas from 1990 to 2015. Our results showed that the current actual farm yields (Ya) in western Kansas represented only 34%, 32%, and 28% of YPd in Thomas, Greeley, and Finney counties, respectively, indicating significant exploitable yield gaps. Agronomic factors (YG1) contributed the greatest to the yield gap in Greeley and Finney counties, whereas socioeconomic constraints (YG2) offered the greatest opportunity for improvement in Thomas county. Our analysis suggested that improving agronomic management could be a greater priority for further yield improvement in Greeley county, but selecting an appropriate hybrid was a greater priority in Finney county.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T00:07:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0e203bb46fdc4712922505f2326a4049
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2048-3694
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T00:07:36Z
publishDate 2022-02-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Food and Energy Security
spelling doaj.art-0e203bb46fdc4712922505f2326a40492022-12-21T18:07:37ZengWileyFood and Energy Security2048-36942022-02-01111n/an/a10.1002/fes3.328Dryland maize yield potentials and constraints: A case study in western KansasShuang Sun0Xiaomao Lin1Gretchen F. Sassenrath2Ignacio Ciampitti3Prasanna Gowda4Qing Ye5Xiaoguang Yang6State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences Beijing ChinaDepartment of Agronomy Kansas State University Manhattan Kansas USADepartment of Agronomy Kansas State University Manhattan Kansas USADepartment of Agronomy Kansas State University Manhattan Kansas USAUSDA ARS Stoneville Mississippi USACollege of Forestry Jiangxi Agricultural University Nanchang ChinaCollege of Resources and Environmental Sciences China Agricultural University Beijing ChinaAbstract Water‐limited environments account for half of the earth's land surface, and dryland agriculture acreage is projected to expand due to climate changes. Examining typical dryland yield potentials and yield improvement measures is crucial for developing future dryland crop production systems. This case study used crop modeling to analyze dryland maize yield potential (YPd), farmers’ yield potential (YPf), and actual farm yields (Ya) from 1990 to 2015 in three counties in western Kansas (i.e., Thomas, Greeley, and Finney in the U.S. Great Plains region). The calibrated APSIM‐Maize model along with actual yields was used to estimate yield gaps attributed to: (a) agronomic factors (YG1 = YPd − YPf) and (b) socioeconomic constraints (YG2 = YPf − Ya). Observed climate conditions during maize‐growing seasons showed warming, brightening, and drying trends for all three counties in western Kansas from 1990 to 2015. Our results showed that the current actual farm yields (Ya) in western Kansas represented only 34%, 32%, and 28% of YPd in Thomas, Greeley, and Finney counties, respectively, indicating significant exploitable yield gaps. Agronomic factors (YG1) contributed the greatest to the yield gap in Greeley and Finney counties, whereas socioeconomic constraints (YG2) offered the greatest opportunity for improvement in Thomas county. Our analysis suggested that improving agronomic management could be a greater priority for further yield improvement in Greeley county, but selecting an appropriate hybrid was a greater priority in Finney county.https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.328APSIM‐Maizeclimate changedryland maize yield potentialsWestern Kansasyield improvements
spellingShingle Shuang Sun
Xiaomao Lin
Gretchen F. Sassenrath
Ignacio Ciampitti
Prasanna Gowda
Qing Ye
Xiaoguang Yang
Dryland maize yield potentials and constraints: A case study in western Kansas
Food and Energy Security
APSIM‐Maize
climate change
dryland maize yield potentials
Western Kansas
yield improvements
title Dryland maize yield potentials and constraints: A case study in western Kansas
title_full Dryland maize yield potentials and constraints: A case study in western Kansas
title_fullStr Dryland maize yield potentials and constraints: A case study in western Kansas
title_full_unstemmed Dryland maize yield potentials and constraints: A case study in western Kansas
title_short Dryland maize yield potentials and constraints: A case study in western Kansas
title_sort dryland maize yield potentials and constraints a case study in western kansas
topic APSIM‐Maize
climate change
dryland maize yield potentials
Western Kansas
yield improvements
url https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.328
work_keys_str_mv AT shuangsun drylandmaizeyieldpotentialsandconstraintsacasestudyinwesternkansas
AT xiaomaolin drylandmaizeyieldpotentialsandconstraintsacasestudyinwesternkansas
AT gretchenfsassenrath drylandmaizeyieldpotentialsandconstraintsacasestudyinwesternkansas
AT ignaciociampitti drylandmaizeyieldpotentialsandconstraintsacasestudyinwesternkansas
AT prasannagowda drylandmaizeyieldpotentialsandconstraintsacasestudyinwesternkansas
AT qingye drylandmaizeyieldpotentialsandconstraintsacasestudyinwesternkansas
AT xiaoguangyang drylandmaizeyieldpotentialsandconstraintsacasestudyinwesternkansas