Agronomic evaluation of sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid) genotypes forits cane yield and quality under different fertilizer levels
An experiment was conducted during 2021-22 to evaluate the performance of early maturing high yielding sugarcane varieties at ICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore. The experiment was planted in split plot design and replicated twice. Seven elite sugarcane genotypes Co 11015, Co 15005, Co 1...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Society for Sugarcane Research and Development
2024-02-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Sugarcane Research |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/JSR/article/view/139771 |
| _version_ | 1797334518113239040 |
|---|---|
| author | Arjun S Tayade Geetha Ponnaiyan Anusha S C Palaniswami P Govindaraj |
| author_facet | Arjun S Tayade Geetha Ponnaiyan Anusha S C Palaniswami P Govindaraj |
| author_sort | Arjun S Tayade |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
An experiment was conducted during 2021-22 to evaluate the performance of early maturing high yielding sugarcane varieties at ICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore. The experiment was planted in split plot design and replicated twice. Seven elite sugarcane genotypes Co 11015, Co 15005, Co 15006, Co 15007, Co 15009, Co 15010, Co 15021 were assessed agronomically with three standards checks i.e. Co 09004, Co 86032 and CoC 671 and two fertilizer levels i.e. 100 and 125 % RDF. The experiment was planted in wide row spacing (150 cm). The crop was harvested at 12th month and observation on NMC, cane height, cane girth, number of nodes, cane weight and cane yield per plot was recorded. Cane yield was influenced significantly due to different elite genotypes wherein, elite sugarcane genotypes, Co 15010 (139.79 t/ha) recorded significantly higher cane yield than the standards Co 86032 (114.85 t/ha), Co09004 (108.74 t/ha) and CoC 671(94.20 t/ha). Juice quality (Brix, sucrose, purity and CCS percent) were studied at harvest with random cane samples. Juice qualities were not influenced significantly due to fertilizer levels; however juice Brix, Sucrose%, Purity % and CCS % at harvest showed significant varietal differences.
|
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T08:21:57Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-0e2872aff10a4e5e86e9161bb7b6084b |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2249-927X 2582-4767 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T08:21:57Z |
| publishDate | 2024-02-01 |
| publisher | Society for Sugarcane Research and Development |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Sugarcane Research |
| spelling | doaj.art-0e2872aff10a4e5e86e9161bb7b6084b2024-02-02T05:24:05ZengSociety for Sugarcane Research and DevelopmentJournal of Sugarcane Research2249-927X2582-47672024-02-0112210.37580/JSR.2022.2.12.186-191Agronomic evaluation of sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid) genotypes forits cane yield and quality under different fertilizer levelsArjun S Tayade0Geetha Ponnaiyan1Anusha S2C PalaniswamiP Govindaraj3ICAR-Central Institute for Cotton Research, NagpurICAR- Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore - 7Scientist Sugar Research Institute, Drasa , Lautoka, Fiji An experiment was conducted during 2021-22 to evaluate the performance of early maturing high yielding sugarcane varieties at ICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore. The experiment was planted in split plot design and replicated twice. Seven elite sugarcane genotypes Co 11015, Co 15005, Co 15006, Co 15007, Co 15009, Co 15010, Co 15021 were assessed agronomically with three standards checks i.e. Co 09004, Co 86032 and CoC 671 and two fertilizer levels i.e. 100 and 125 % RDF. The experiment was planted in wide row spacing (150 cm). The crop was harvested at 12th month and observation on NMC, cane height, cane girth, number of nodes, cane weight and cane yield per plot was recorded. Cane yield was influenced significantly due to different elite genotypes wherein, elite sugarcane genotypes, Co 15010 (139.79 t/ha) recorded significantly higher cane yield than the standards Co 86032 (114.85 t/ha), Co09004 (108.74 t/ha) and CoC 671(94.20 t/ha). Juice quality (Brix, sucrose, purity and CCS percent) were studied at harvest with random cane samples. Juice qualities were not influenced significantly due to fertilizer levels; however juice Brix, Sucrose%, Purity % and CCS % at harvest showed significant varietal differences. https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/JSR/article/view/139771Sugarcane genotypes; Fertilizer level; Yield; Quality parameters |
| spellingShingle | Arjun S Tayade Geetha Ponnaiyan Anusha S C Palaniswami P Govindaraj Agronomic evaluation of sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid) genotypes forits cane yield and quality under different fertilizer levels Journal of Sugarcane Research Sugarcane genotypes; Fertilizer level; Yield; Quality parameters |
| title | Agronomic evaluation of sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid) genotypes forits cane yield and quality under different fertilizer levels |
| title_full | Agronomic evaluation of sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid) genotypes forits cane yield and quality under different fertilizer levels |
| title_fullStr | Agronomic evaluation of sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid) genotypes forits cane yield and quality under different fertilizer levels |
| title_full_unstemmed | Agronomic evaluation of sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid) genotypes forits cane yield and quality under different fertilizer levels |
| title_short | Agronomic evaluation of sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid) genotypes forits cane yield and quality under different fertilizer levels |
| title_sort | agronomic evaluation of sugarcane saccharum spp hybrid genotypes forits cane yield and quality under different fertilizer levels |
| topic | Sugarcane genotypes; Fertilizer level; Yield; Quality parameters |
| url | https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/JSR/article/view/139771 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT arjunstayade agronomicevaluationofsugarcanesaccharumspphybridgenotypesforitscaneyieldandqualityunderdifferentfertilizerlevels AT geethaponnaiyan agronomicevaluationofsugarcanesaccharumspphybridgenotypesforitscaneyieldandqualityunderdifferentfertilizerlevels AT anushas agronomicevaluationofsugarcanesaccharumspphybridgenotypesforitscaneyieldandqualityunderdifferentfertilizerlevels AT cpalaniswami agronomicevaluationofsugarcanesaccharumspphybridgenotypesforitscaneyieldandqualityunderdifferentfertilizerlevels AT pgovindaraj agronomicevaluationofsugarcanesaccharumspphybridgenotypesforitscaneyieldandqualityunderdifferentfertilizerlevels |