Higher TIER bumble bees and solitary bees recommendations for a semi-field experimental design
The publication of the proposed EFSA risk assessment guidance document of plant protection products for pollinators highlighted that there are no study designs for non-Apis pollinators available. Since no official guidelines exist for semi-field testing at present, protocols were proposed by the ICP...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Julius Kühn-Institut
2020-05-01
|
| Series: | Julius-Kühn-Archiv |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.openagrar.de/receive/openagrar_mods_00059809 |
| _version_ | 1797348534402416640 |
|---|---|
| author | Allan, Matthew J. Alscher, Annika Amsel, Kristin Classen, Christian Cornement, Magdaléna Elston, Charlotte Exeler, Nina Franke, Lea Frommberger, Malte Giffard, Hervé Guerola, Juan Sorlí Hecht-Rost, Sabine Hodapp, Bettina Hotopp, Ines Jenkins, Carole Jütte, Tobias Kimmel, Stefan Klein, Olaf Kullmann, Britta Lückmann, Johannes Persigehl, Markus Roessink, Ivo Schneider, Christof Schnurr, Alexander Tänzler, Verena van der Steen, Jozef J.M. |
| author_facet | Allan, Matthew J. Alscher, Annika Amsel, Kristin Classen, Christian Cornement, Magdaléna Elston, Charlotte Exeler, Nina Franke, Lea Frommberger, Malte Giffard, Hervé Guerola, Juan Sorlí Hecht-Rost, Sabine Hodapp, Bettina Hotopp, Ines Jenkins, Carole Jütte, Tobias Kimmel, Stefan Klein, Olaf Kullmann, Britta Lückmann, Johannes Persigehl, Markus Roessink, Ivo Schneider, Christof Schnurr, Alexander Tänzler, Verena van der Steen, Jozef J.M. |
| author_sort | Allan, Matthew J. |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The publication of the proposed EFSA risk assessment guidance document of plant protection products for pollinators highlighted that there are no study designs for non-Apis pollinators available. Since no official guidelines exist for semi-field testing at present, protocols were proposed by the ICPPR non-Apis working group and two years of ring-testing were conducted in 2016 and 2017 to develop a general test set-up. The ringtest design was based on the draft EFSA guidance document, OEPP/EPPO Guideline No. 170 and results of discussions regarding testing solitary bees and bumble bees during the meetings of the ICPPR non-Apis workgroup. Ring-tests were conducted with two different test organisms, one representative of a social bumble bee species (Bombus terrestris L; Hymenoptera, Apidae) and one representative of a solitary bee species (Osmia bicornis L; Hymenoptera, Megachilidae). The species are common species in Europe, commercially available and widely used for pollination services. Several laboratories participated in the higher-tier ring tests. 15 semi-field tests were conducted with bumble bees and 16 semi-field tests were done with solitary bees in 2016 and 2017. Two treatment groups were always included in the ringtests: an untreated control (water treated) and the treatment with dimethoate as a toxic reference item (optional other i.e. brood-affecting substances fenoxycarb or diflubenzuron). The toxic reference items were chosen based on their mode of action and long term experience in honey bee testing. A summary of the ringtest results will be given and the recommendations for the two semi-field test designs will be presented. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T12:07:22Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-0e2caa80e59b4d9ba74cc859e4cdd050 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1868-9892 2199-921X |
| language | deu |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T12:07:22Z |
| publishDate | 2020-05-01 |
| publisher | Julius Kühn-Institut |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Julius-Kühn-Archiv |
| spelling | doaj.art-0e2caa80e59b4d9ba74cc859e4cdd0502024-01-23T05:03:50ZdeuJulius Kühn-InstitutJulius-Kühn-Archiv1868-98922199-921X2020-05-01465404510.5073/jka.2020.465.016Higher TIER bumble bees and solitary bees recommendations for a semi-field experimental designAllan, Matthew J.0Alscher, Annika1Amsel, Kristin2Classen, Christian3Cornement, Magdaléna4Elston, Charlotte5Exeler, Nina6Franke, Lea7Frommberger, Malte8Giffard, Hervé9Guerola, Juan Sorlí10Hecht-Rost, Sabine11Hodapp, Bettina12Hotopp, Ines13Jenkins, Carole14Jütte, Tobias15Kimmel, Stefan16Klein, Olaf17Kullmann, Britta18Lückmann, Johannes19Persigehl, Markus20Roessink, Ivo21Schneider, Christof22Schnurr, Alexander23Tänzler, Verena24van der Steen, Jozef J.M. 25Eurofins Agroscience Services Ecotox GmbH, Niefern-Öschelbronn, GermanyRifcon GmbH, Hirschberg, GermanyBioChem agrar GmbH, Machern/OT Gerichshain, GermanyRifcon GmbH, Hirschberg, GermanyInnovative Environmental Services (IES) Ltd, Witterswil, SwitzerlandSyngenta Ltd, Jealott’s Hill International Research Centre Bracknell, Berkshire, United KingdomBayer CropScience, Monheim, GermanyEurofins Agroscience Services Ecotox GmbH, Niefern-Öschelbronn, GermanyJulius Kühn-Institut Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Bee Protection, GermanyTestapi, Gennes, Gennes-Val-de-Loire, FranceTrialcamp SLU, Alcasser, SpainRifcon GmbH, Hirschberg, GermanyInnovative Environmental Services (IES) Ltd, Witterswil, Switzerlandtier3 solutions GmbH, Leverkusen, GermanyEnvigo, Alconbury, Huntingdon, United KingdomJulius Kühn-Institut Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Bee Protection, GermanyInnovative Environmental Services (IES) Ltd, Witterswil, SwitzerlandEurofins Agroscience Services Ecotox GmbH, Niefern-Öschelbronn, Germanytier3 solutions GmbH, Leverkusen, GermanyRifcon GmbH, Hirschberg, Germanytier3 solutions GmbH, Leverkusen, GermanyWageningen Environmental Research, Wageningen, The NetherlandsBASF, Limburgerhof, GermanyBioChem agrar GmbH, Machern/OT Gerichshain, GermanyIBACON GmbH, Roßdorf, GermanyAlveus AB Consultancy, Oisterwijk, The NetherlandsThe publication of the proposed EFSA risk assessment guidance document of plant protection products for pollinators highlighted that there are no study designs for non-Apis pollinators available. Since no official guidelines exist for semi-field testing at present, protocols were proposed by the ICPPR non-Apis working group and two years of ring-testing were conducted in 2016 and 2017 to develop a general test set-up. The ringtest design was based on the draft EFSA guidance document, OEPP/EPPO Guideline No. 170 and results of discussions regarding testing solitary bees and bumble bees during the meetings of the ICPPR non-Apis workgroup. Ring-tests were conducted with two different test organisms, one representative of a social bumble bee species (Bombus terrestris L; Hymenoptera, Apidae) and one representative of a solitary bee species (Osmia bicornis L; Hymenoptera, Megachilidae). The species are common species in Europe, commercially available and widely used for pollination services. Several laboratories participated in the higher-tier ring tests. 15 semi-field tests were conducted with bumble bees and 16 semi-field tests were done with solitary bees in 2016 and 2017. Two treatment groups were always included in the ringtests: an untreated control (water treated) and the treatment with dimethoate as a toxic reference item (optional other i.e. brood-affecting substances fenoxycarb or diflubenzuron). The toxic reference items were chosen based on their mode of action and long term experience in honey bee testing. A summary of the ringtest results will be given and the recommendations for the two semi-field test designs will be presented.https://www.openagrar.de/receive/openagrar_mods_00059809semi-field testingnon-apis beesbumble beessolitary bees |
| spellingShingle | Allan, Matthew J. Alscher, Annika Amsel, Kristin Classen, Christian Cornement, Magdaléna Elston, Charlotte Exeler, Nina Franke, Lea Frommberger, Malte Giffard, Hervé Guerola, Juan Sorlí Hecht-Rost, Sabine Hodapp, Bettina Hotopp, Ines Jenkins, Carole Jütte, Tobias Kimmel, Stefan Klein, Olaf Kullmann, Britta Lückmann, Johannes Persigehl, Markus Roessink, Ivo Schneider, Christof Schnurr, Alexander Tänzler, Verena van der Steen, Jozef J.M. Higher TIER bumble bees and solitary bees recommendations for a semi-field experimental design Julius-Kühn-Archiv semi-field testing non-apis bees bumble bees solitary bees |
| title | Higher TIER bumble bees and solitary bees recommendations for a semi-field experimental design |
| title_full | Higher TIER bumble bees and solitary bees recommendations for a semi-field experimental design |
| title_fullStr | Higher TIER bumble bees and solitary bees recommendations for a semi-field experimental design |
| title_full_unstemmed | Higher TIER bumble bees and solitary bees recommendations for a semi-field experimental design |
| title_short | Higher TIER bumble bees and solitary bees recommendations for a semi-field experimental design |
| title_sort | higher tier bumble bees and solitary bees recommendations for a semi field experimental design |
| topic | semi-field testing non-apis bees bumble bees solitary bees |
| url | https://www.openagrar.de/receive/openagrar_mods_00059809 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT allanmatthewj highertierbumblebeesandsolitarybeesrecommendationsforasemifieldexperimentaldesign AT alscherannika highertierbumblebeesandsolitarybeesrecommendationsforasemifieldexperimentaldesign AT amselkristin highertierbumblebeesandsolitarybeesrecommendationsforasemifieldexperimentaldesign AT classenchristian highertierbumblebeesandsolitarybeesrecommendationsforasemifieldexperimentaldesign AT cornementmagdalena highertierbumblebeesandsolitarybeesrecommendationsforasemifieldexperimentaldesign AT elstoncharlotte highertierbumblebeesandsolitarybeesrecommendationsforasemifieldexperimentaldesign AT exelernina highertierbumblebeesandsolitarybeesrecommendationsforasemifieldexperimentaldesign AT frankelea highertierbumblebeesandsolitarybeesrecommendationsforasemifieldexperimentaldesign AT frommbergermalte highertierbumblebeesandsolitarybeesrecommendationsforasemifieldexperimentaldesign AT giffardherve highertierbumblebeesandsolitarybeesrecommendationsforasemifieldexperimentaldesign AT guerolajuansorli highertierbumblebeesandsolitarybeesrecommendationsforasemifieldexperimentaldesign AT hechtrostsabine highertierbumblebeesandsolitarybeesrecommendationsforasemifieldexperimentaldesign AT hodappbettina highertierbumblebeesandsolitarybeesrecommendationsforasemifieldexperimentaldesign AT hotoppines highertierbumblebeesandsolitarybeesrecommendationsforasemifieldexperimentaldesign AT jenkinscarole highertierbumblebeesandsolitarybeesrecommendationsforasemifieldexperimentaldesign AT juttetobias highertierbumblebeesandsolitarybeesrecommendationsforasemifieldexperimentaldesign AT kimmelstefan highertierbumblebeesandsolitarybeesrecommendationsforasemifieldexperimentaldesign AT kleinolaf highertierbumblebeesandsolitarybeesrecommendationsforasemifieldexperimentaldesign AT kullmannbritta highertierbumblebeesandsolitarybeesrecommendationsforasemifieldexperimentaldesign AT luckmannjohannes highertierbumblebeesandsolitarybeesrecommendationsforasemifieldexperimentaldesign AT persigehlmarkus highertierbumblebeesandsolitarybeesrecommendationsforasemifieldexperimentaldesign AT roessinkivo highertierbumblebeesandsolitarybeesrecommendationsforasemifieldexperimentaldesign AT schneiderchristof highertierbumblebeesandsolitarybeesrecommendationsforasemifieldexperimentaldesign AT schnurralexander highertierbumblebeesandsolitarybeesrecommendationsforasemifieldexperimentaldesign AT tanzlerverena highertierbumblebeesandsolitarybeesrecommendationsforasemifieldexperimentaldesign AT vandersteenjozefjm highertierbumblebeesandsolitarybeesrecommendationsforasemifieldexperimentaldesign |