Nano-biolistics: a method of biolistic transfection of cells and tissues using a gene gun with novel nanometer-sized projectiles

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Biolistic transfection is proving an increasingly popular method of incorporating DNA or RNA into cells that are difficult to transfect using traditional methods. The technique routinely uses 'microparticles', which are ~1...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lummis Sarah CR, O'Brien John A
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-06-01
Series:BMC Biotechnology
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6750/11/66
_version_ 1818040276607827968
author Lummis Sarah CR
O'Brien John A
author_facet Lummis Sarah CR
O'Brien John A
author_sort Lummis Sarah CR
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Biolistic transfection is proving an increasingly popular method of incorporating DNA or RNA into cells that are difficult to transfect using traditional methods. The technique routinely uses 'microparticles', which are ~1 μm diameter projectiles, fired into tissues using pressurised gas. These microparticles are efficient at delivering DNA into cells, but cannot efficiently transfect small cells and may cause significant tissue damage, thus limiting their potential usefulness. Here we describe the use of 40 nm diameter projectiles - nanoparticles - in biolistic transfections to determine if they are a suitable alternative to microparticles.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Examination of transfection efficiencies in HEK293 cells, using a range of conditions including different DNA concentrations and different preparation procedures, reveals similar behaviour of microparticles and nanoparticles. The use of nanoparticles, however, resulted in ~30% fewer damaged HEK293 cells following transfection. Biolistic transfection of mouse ear tissue revealed similar depth penetration for the two types of particles, and also showed that < 10% of nuclei were damaged in nanoparticle-transfected samples, compared to > 20% in microparticle-transfected samples. Visualising details of small cellular structures was also considerably enhanced when using nanoparticles.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>We conclude that nanoparticles are as efficient for biolistic transfection as microparticles, and are more appropriate for use in small cells, when examining cellular structures and/or where tissue damage is a problem.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-10T08:11:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0e31ab0c5d664634a70c06f99788a295
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6750
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T08:11:57Z
publishDate 2011-06-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Biotechnology
spelling doaj.art-0e31ab0c5d664634a70c06f99788a2952022-12-22T01:56:33ZengBMCBMC Biotechnology1472-67502011-06-011116610.1186/1472-6750-11-66Nano-biolistics: a method of biolistic transfection of cells and tissues using a gene gun with novel nanometer-sized projectilesLummis Sarah CRO'Brien John A<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Biolistic transfection is proving an increasingly popular method of incorporating DNA or RNA into cells that are difficult to transfect using traditional methods. The technique routinely uses 'microparticles', which are ~1 μm diameter projectiles, fired into tissues using pressurised gas. These microparticles are efficient at delivering DNA into cells, but cannot efficiently transfect small cells and may cause significant tissue damage, thus limiting their potential usefulness. Here we describe the use of 40 nm diameter projectiles - nanoparticles - in biolistic transfections to determine if they are a suitable alternative to microparticles.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Examination of transfection efficiencies in HEK293 cells, using a range of conditions including different DNA concentrations and different preparation procedures, reveals similar behaviour of microparticles and nanoparticles. The use of nanoparticles, however, resulted in ~30% fewer damaged HEK293 cells following transfection. Biolistic transfection of mouse ear tissue revealed similar depth penetration for the two types of particles, and also showed that < 10% of nuclei were damaged in nanoparticle-transfected samples, compared to > 20% in microparticle-transfected samples. Visualising details of small cellular structures was also considerably enhanced when using nanoparticles.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>We conclude that nanoparticles are as efficient for biolistic transfection as microparticles, and are more appropriate for use in small cells, when examining cellular structures and/or where tissue damage is a problem.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6750/11/66
spellingShingle Lummis Sarah CR
O'Brien John A
Nano-biolistics: a method of biolistic transfection of cells and tissues using a gene gun with novel nanometer-sized projectiles
BMC Biotechnology
title Nano-biolistics: a method of biolistic transfection of cells and tissues using a gene gun with novel nanometer-sized projectiles
title_full Nano-biolistics: a method of biolistic transfection of cells and tissues using a gene gun with novel nanometer-sized projectiles
title_fullStr Nano-biolistics: a method of biolistic transfection of cells and tissues using a gene gun with novel nanometer-sized projectiles
title_full_unstemmed Nano-biolistics: a method of biolistic transfection of cells and tissues using a gene gun with novel nanometer-sized projectiles
title_short Nano-biolistics: a method of biolistic transfection of cells and tissues using a gene gun with novel nanometer-sized projectiles
title_sort nano biolistics a method of biolistic transfection of cells and tissues using a gene gun with novel nanometer sized projectiles
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6750/11/66
work_keys_str_mv AT lummissarahcr nanobiolisticsamethodofbiolistictransfectionofcellsandtissuesusingagenegunwithnovelnanometersizedprojectiles
AT obrienjohna nanobiolisticsamethodofbiolistictransfectionofcellsandtissuesusingagenegunwithnovelnanometersizedprojectiles