A note on internet use and the 2016 U.S. presidential election outcome.

We use data from the American National Election Studies from 1996 to 2016 to study the role of the internet in the 2016 U.S. presidential election outcome. We compare trends in the Republican share of the vote between likely and unlikely internet users, and between actual internet users and non-user...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Levi Boxell, Matthew Gentzkow, Jesse M Shapiro
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6051565?pdf=render
_version_ 1811211882685530112
author Levi Boxell
Matthew Gentzkow
Jesse M Shapiro
author_facet Levi Boxell
Matthew Gentzkow
Jesse M Shapiro
author_sort Levi Boxell
collection DOAJ
description We use data from the American National Election Studies from 1996 to 2016 to study the role of the internet in the 2016 U.S. presidential election outcome. We compare trends in the Republican share of the vote between likely and unlikely internet users, and between actual internet users and non-users. Relative to prior years, the Republican share of the vote in 2016 was as high or higher among the groups least active online.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T05:19:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0e326c0ba7224a7c95923db3c51fb485
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T05:19:53Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-0e326c0ba7224a7c95923db3c51fb4852022-12-22T03:46:29ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01137e019957110.1371/journal.pone.0199571A note on internet use and the 2016 U.S. presidential election outcome.Levi BoxellMatthew GentzkowJesse M ShapiroWe use data from the American National Election Studies from 1996 to 2016 to study the role of the internet in the 2016 U.S. presidential election outcome. We compare trends in the Republican share of the vote between likely and unlikely internet users, and between actual internet users and non-users. Relative to prior years, the Republican share of the vote in 2016 was as high or higher among the groups least active online.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6051565?pdf=render
spellingShingle Levi Boxell
Matthew Gentzkow
Jesse M Shapiro
A note on internet use and the 2016 U.S. presidential election outcome.
PLoS ONE
title A note on internet use and the 2016 U.S. presidential election outcome.
title_full A note on internet use and the 2016 U.S. presidential election outcome.
title_fullStr A note on internet use and the 2016 U.S. presidential election outcome.
title_full_unstemmed A note on internet use and the 2016 U.S. presidential election outcome.
title_short A note on internet use and the 2016 U.S. presidential election outcome.
title_sort note on internet use and the 2016 u s presidential election outcome
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6051565?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT leviboxell anoteoninternetuseandthe2016uspresidentialelectionoutcome
AT matthewgentzkow anoteoninternetuseandthe2016uspresidentialelectionoutcome
AT jessemshapiro anoteoninternetuseandthe2016uspresidentialelectionoutcome
AT leviboxell noteoninternetuseandthe2016uspresidentialelectionoutcome
AT matthewgentzkow noteoninternetuseandthe2016uspresidentialelectionoutcome
AT jessemshapiro noteoninternetuseandthe2016uspresidentialelectionoutcome