‘Brave Enough’: A Qualitative Study of Veterinary Decisions to Withhold or Delay Antimicrobial Treatment in Pets
Veterinarians sometimes prescribe antimicrobials even when they know or suspect that they are unnecessary. The drivers of this behaviour must be understood to design effective antimicrobial stewardship interventions. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 22 veterinarians who treated compani...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-03-01
|
Series: | Antibiotics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/12/3/540 |
_version_ | 1827751657196224512 |
---|---|
author | Ri O. Scarborough Anna E. Sri Glenn F. Browning Laura Y. Hardefeldt Kirsten E. Bailey |
author_facet | Ri O. Scarborough Anna E. Sri Glenn F. Browning Laura Y. Hardefeldt Kirsten E. Bailey |
author_sort | Ri O. Scarborough |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Veterinarians sometimes prescribe antimicrobials even when they know or suspect that they are unnecessary. The drivers of this behaviour must be understood to design effective antimicrobial stewardship interventions. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 22 veterinarians who treated companion animals in Australia. The Theory of Planned Behaviour was used to organise interview themes, focusing on a decision to withhold antimicrobial therapy in the absence of a clear indication. Many background factors influenced antimicrobial-withholding decisions, including the veterinarian’s communication skills, general attitudes towards antimicrobial resistance (AMR), habits and energy levels. Client awareness of AMR and the veterinarian–client relationship were also important. Beliefs about the consequences of withholding antimicrobials (behavioural beliefs) were dominated by fears of the animal’s condition deteriorating and of failing to meet client expectations. These fears, weighed against the seemingly distant consequences of AMR, were major barriers to withholding antimicrobials. Normative beliefs were primarily focused on the expected approval (or disapproval) of the client and of other veterinarians. Control beliefs about the difficulty of withholding antimicrobials centred around client factors, most importantly, their capacity to adequately monitor their animal, to pay for further investigations, or to undertake non-antimicrobial management, such as wound care, at home. The use of antimicrobials by companion animal veterinarians in the absence of a clear indication is often powerfully driven by behavioural beliefs, chiefly, fears of clinical deterioration and of failing to meet client expectations. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-11T07:01:09Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-0e40ed819af14de69ce7bb40c903a2ae |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2079-6382 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-11T07:01:09Z |
publishDate | 2023-03-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Antibiotics |
spelling | doaj.art-0e40ed819af14de69ce7bb40c903a2ae2023-11-17T09:14:27ZengMDPI AGAntibiotics2079-63822023-03-0112354010.3390/antibiotics12030540‘Brave Enough’: A Qualitative Study of Veterinary Decisions to Withhold or Delay Antimicrobial Treatment in PetsRi O. Scarborough0Anna E. Sri1Glenn F. Browning2Laura Y. Hardefeldt3Kirsten E. Bailey4Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, AustraliaAsia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, AustraliaAsia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, AustraliaAsia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, AustraliaAsia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, AustraliaVeterinarians sometimes prescribe antimicrobials even when they know or suspect that they are unnecessary. The drivers of this behaviour must be understood to design effective antimicrobial stewardship interventions. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 22 veterinarians who treated companion animals in Australia. The Theory of Planned Behaviour was used to organise interview themes, focusing on a decision to withhold antimicrobial therapy in the absence of a clear indication. Many background factors influenced antimicrobial-withholding decisions, including the veterinarian’s communication skills, general attitudes towards antimicrobial resistance (AMR), habits and energy levels. Client awareness of AMR and the veterinarian–client relationship were also important. Beliefs about the consequences of withholding antimicrobials (behavioural beliefs) were dominated by fears of the animal’s condition deteriorating and of failing to meet client expectations. These fears, weighed against the seemingly distant consequences of AMR, were major barriers to withholding antimicrobials. Normative beliefs were primarily focused on the expected approval (or disapproval) of the client and of other veterinarians. Control beliefs about the difficulty of withholding antimicrobials centred around client factors, most importantly, their capacity to adequately monitor their animal, to pay for further investigations, or to undertake non-antimicrobial management, such as wound care, at home. The use of antimicrobials by companion animal veterinarians in the absence of a clear indication is often powerfully driven by behavioural beliefs, chiefly, fears of clinical deterioration and of failing to meet client expectations.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/12/3/540antibioticresistancestewardshipanimalOne Healthbarriers |
spellingShingle | Ri O. Scarborough Anna E. Sri Glenn F. Browning Laura Y. Hardefeldt Kirsten E. Bailey ‘Brave Enough’: A Qualitative Study of Veterinary Decisions to Withhold or Delay Antimicrobial Treatment in Pets Antibiotics antibiotic resistance stewardship animal One Health barriers |
title | ‘Brave Enough’: A Qualitative Study of Veterinary Decisions to Withhold or Delay Antimicrobial Treatment in Pets |
title_full | ‘Brave Enough’: A Qualitative Study of Veterinary Decisions to Withhold or Delay Antimicrobial Treatment in Pets |
title_fullStr | ‘Brave Enough’: A Qualitative Study of Veterinary Decisions to Withhold or Delay Antimicrobial Treatment in Pets |
title_full_unstemmed | ‘Brave Enough’: A Qualitative Study of Veterinary Decisions to Withhold or Delay Antimicrobial Treatment in Pets |
title_short | ‘Brave Enough’: A Qualitative Study of Veterinary Decisions to Withhold or Delay Antimicrobial Treatment in Pets |
title_sort | brave enough a qualitative study of veterinary decisions to withhold or delay antimicrobial treatment in pets |
topic | antibiotic resistance stewardship animal One Health barriers |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/12/3/540 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rioscarborough braveenoughaqualitativestudyofveterinarydecisionstowithholdordelayantimicrobialtreatmentinpets AT annaesri braveenoughaqualitativestudyofveterinarydecisionstowithholdordelayantimicrobialtreatmentinpets AT glennfbrowning braveenoughaqualitativestudyofveterinarydecisionstowithholdordelayantimicrobialtreatmentinpets AT laurayhardefeldt braveenoughaqualitativestudyofveterinarydecisionstowithholdordelayantimicrobialtreatmentinpets AT kirstenebailey braveenoughaqualitativestudyofveterinarydecisionstowithholdordelayantimicrobialtreatmentinpets |