Effect of inlet sweepback angle on the cavitation performance of an inducer

In order to study the effects of inlet sweepback angle on the cavitation performance of inducers based on the Reynolds N-S equation, RNG k-ε turbulent model, and Schnerr and Sauer cavitation model, a three-dimensional numerical calculation is employed to study the flow characteristics of a certain L...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiaorui Cheng, Yibin Li, Shuyan Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2019-01-01
Series:Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2019.1640134
_version_ 1819020652914409472
author Xiaorui Cheng
Yibin Li
Shuyan Zhang
author_facet Xiaorui Cheng
Yibin Li
Shuyan Zhang
author_sort Xiaorui Cheng
collection DOAJ
description In order to study the effects of inlet sweepback angle on the cavitation performance of inducers based on the Reynolds N-S equation, RNG k-ε turbulent model, and Schnerr and Sauer cavitation model, a three-dimensional numerical calculation is employed to study the flow characteristics of a certain LNG pump. Laws of the variation of cavitation performance, head, and efficiency with the change of sweepback were studied. Numerical analysis of the eight inducer projects with a sweepback angle from 120° to 290° was carried out. The results show that the cavitation bubbles first appear at the suction surface near the inlet side. With the decrease of net positive suction head (NPSHa), the bubbles spread to the outlet side of the inducer and the pressure surface. Finally, they fill the entire channel. When the inducer sweepback angle increases from 120° to 270°, the NPSHr of the pump reduces gradually, that is to say that the anti-cavitation performance of the pump has been improved. However, the NPSHr of the pump increases gradually when the inducer sweepback angle increases from 270° to 290°. In other words, there is an optimal sweepback from 120° to 290°, and efficiency and head of pump tend to be stable near the optimal sweepback.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T03:54:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0e436d32af4f44c49be6dcf433dfd3fd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1994-2060
1997-003X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T03:54:37Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics
spelling doaj.art-0e436d32af4f44c49be6dcf433dfd3fd2022-12-21T19:16:52ZengTaylor & Francis GroupEngineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics1994-20601997-003X2019-01-0113171372310.1080/19942060.2019.16401341640134Effect of inlet sweepback angle on the cavitation performance of an inducerXiaorui Cheng0Yibin Li1Shuyan Zhang2Lanzhou University of TechnologyLanzhou University of TechnologyLanzhou University of TechnologyIn order to study the effects of inlet sweepback angle on the cavitation performance of inducers based on the Reynolds N-S equation, RNG k-ε turbulent model, and Schnerr and Sauer cavitation model, a three-dimensional numerical calculation is employed to study the flow characteristics of a certain LNG pump. Laws of the variation of cavitation performance, head, and efficiency with the change of sweepback were studied. Numerical analysis of the eight inducer projects with a sweepback angle from 120° to 290° was carried out. The results show that the cavitation bubbles first appear at the suction surface near the inlet side. With the decrease of net positive suction head (NPSHa), the bubbles spread to the outlet side of the inducer and the pressure surface. Finally, they fill the entire channel. When the inducer sweepback angle increases from 120° to 270°, the NPSHr of the pump reduces gradually, that is to say that the anti-cavitation performance of the pump has been improved. However, the NPSHr of the pump increases gradually when the inducer sweepback angle increases from 270° to 290°. In other words, there is an optimal sweepback from 120° to 290°, and efficiency and head of pump tend to be stable near the optimal sweepback.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2019.1640134inducersweepback anglecavitationsimulation
spellingShingle Xiaorui Cheng
Yibin Li
Shuyan Zhang
Effect of inlet sweepback angle on the cavitation performance of an inducer
Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics
inducer
sweepback angle
cavitation
simulation
title Effect of inlet sweepback angle on the cavitation performance of an inducer
title_full Effect of inlet sweepback angle on the cavitation performance of an inducer
title_fullStr Effect of inlet sweepback angle on the cavitation performance of an inducer
title_full_unstemmed Effect of inlet sweepback angle on the cavitation performance of an inducer
title_short Effect of inlet sweepback angle on the cavitation performance of an inducer
title_sort effect of inlet sweepback angle on the cavitation performance of an inducer
topic inducer
sweepback angle
cavitation
simulation
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2019.1640134
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaoruicheng effectofinletsweepbackangleonthecavitationperformanceofaninducer
AT yibinli effectofinletsweepbackangleonthecavitationperformanceofaninducer
AT shuyanzhang effectofinletsweepbackangleonthecavitationperformanceofaninducer