‘Boys Don’t Cry’ – An Ambiguous Statement?

As has often been observed in the literature, an utterance of a generic such as ‘Boys don’t cry’ can convey a normative behavioral rule that applies to boys, roughly: that boys shouldn’t cry. This observation has led many authors to the claim that generics are ambiguous: they allow both for a descri...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Katharina Felka
Format: Article
Language:ces
Published: Institute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of Sciences 2021-08-01
Series:Organon F
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/09211842orgf.2021.28305.pdf
_version_ 1818843798866755584
author Katharina Felka
author_facet Katharina Felka
author_sort Katharina Felka
collection DOAJ
description As has often been observed in the literature, an utterance of a generic such as ‘Boys don’t cry’ can convey a normative behavioral rule that applies to boys, roughly: that boys shouldn’t cry. This observation has led many authors to the claim that generics are ambiguous: they allow both for a descriptive as well as a normative reading. The present paper argues against this common assumption: it argues that the observation in question should be addressed at the level of pragmatics, rather than at the level of semantics. In particular, the paper argues that the normative force of utterances of generics results from the presence of a conversational implicature. This result should somewhat alleviate the task of finding a proper semantic analysis of generics since it shows that at least one of their intriguing features need not be reflected in their truth-conditions.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T05:03:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0e53985d7b7a415995387f68529d28d4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1335-0668
2585-7150
language ces
last_indexed 2024-12-19T05:03:36Z
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher Institute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of Sciences
record_format Article
series Organon F
spelling doaj.art-0e53985d7b7a415995387f68529d28d42022-12-21T20:35:01ZcesInstitute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of SciencesOrganon F1335-06682585-71502021-08-01283581595https://doi.org/10.31577/orgf.2021.28305‘Boys Don’t Cry’ – An Ambiguous Statement?Katharina Felka0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4921-8815University of GrazAs has often been observed in the literature, an utterance of a generic such as ‘Boys don’t cry’ can convey a normative behavioral rule that applies to boys, roughly: that boys shouldn’t cry. This observation has led many authors to the claim that generics are ambiguous: they allow both for a descriptive as well as a normative reading. The present paper argues against this common assumption: it argues that the observation in question should be addressed at the level of pragmatics, rather than at the level of semantics. In particular, the paper argues that the normative force of utterances of generics results from the presence of a conversational implicature. This result should somewhat alleviate the task of finding a proper semantic analysis of generics since it shows that at least one of their intriguing features need not be reflected in their truth-conditions.https://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/09211842orgf.2021.28305.pdfgenericsnormative genericssemantics-pragmatics interfaceconversational implicatures
spellingShingle Katharina Felka
‘Boys Don’t Cry’ – An Ambiguous Statement?
Organon F
generics
normative generics
semantics-pragmatics interface
conversational implicatures
title ‘Boys Don’t Cry’ – An Ambiguous Statement?
title_full ‘Boys Don’t Cry’ – An Ambiguous Statement?
title_fullStr ‘Boys Don’t Cry’ – An Ambiguous Statement?
title_full_unstemmed ‘Boys Don’t Cry’ – An Ambiguous Statement?
title_short ‘Boys Don’t Cry’ – An Ambiguous Statement?
title_sort boys don t cry an ambiguous statement
topic generics
normative generics
semantics-pragmatics interface
conversational implicatures
url https://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/09211842orgf.2021.28305.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT katharinafelka boysdontcryanambiguousstatement