Operation Enduring Freedom: Institutional Constraints, Alliance Commitments, and the Power Capabilities of Counterterrorism
'What prompted states to participate in the War on Terror? Conventional wisdom concludes that the endeavor is an unpopular exercise in US imperialism, yet this argument is juxtaposed with the overwhelming amount of international support in its initial stages. Additionally, while there is a grea...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of St Andrews
2014-06-01
|
Series: | Journal of Terrorism Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://jtr.st-andrews.ac.uk/articles/880 |
_version_ | 1818681808202498048 |
---|---|
author | Kyle T Kattelman |
author_facet | Kyle T Kattelman |
author_sort | Kyle T Kattelman |
collection | DOAJ |
description | 'What prompted states to participate in the War on Terror? Conventional wisdom concludes that the endeavor is an unpopular exercise in US imperialism, yet this argument is juxtaposed with the overwhelming amount of international support in its initial stages. Additionally, while there is a great depth and breadth of information on aggregate terrorist attacks and their theoretical motivation, there is relatively little with regards to counterterrorist behavior. This study represents the first of its kind to examine from a global perspective the counterterrorist behavior of states by linking it to the conflict theories of general and immediate deterrence. The results will show how democratic characteristics inhibit military commitment while alliance obligations act as an outside constraint that engenders preemptive behavior. However, once committed militarily, state capabilities are the main influence on the level of preemptive action applied. This analysis supports the utilization of traditional conflict theories when examining state counterterrorist behavior.' <div>' '</div> |
first_indexed | 2024-12-17T10:08:50Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-0e5ea6b06e3d418b90e4b865e3cb854e |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2049-7040 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-17T10:08:50Z |
publishDate | 2014-06-01 |
publisher | University of St Andrews |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Terrorism Research |
spelling | doaj.art-0e5ea6b06e3d418b90e4b865e3cb854e2022-12-21T21:53:04ZengUniversity of St AndrewsJournal of Terrorism Research2049-70402014-06-015210.15664/jtr.880715Operation Enduring Freedom: Institutional Constraints, Alliance Commitments, and the Power Capabilities of CounterterrorismKyle T Kattelman'What prompted states to participate in the War on Terror? Conventional wisdom concludes that the endeavor is an unpopular exercise in US imperialism, yet this argument is juxtaposed with the overwhelming amount of international support in its initial stages. Additionally, while there is a great depth and breadth of information on aggregate terrorist attacks and their theoretical motivation, there is relatively little with regards to counterterrorist behavior. This study represents the first of its kind to examine from a global perspective the counterterrorist behavior of states by linking it to the conflict theories of general and immediate deterrence. The results will show how democratic characteristics inhibit military commitment while alliance obligations act as an outside constraint that engenders preemptive behavior. However, once committed militarily, state capabilities are the main influence on the level of preemptive action applied. This analysis supports the utilization of traditional conflict theories when examining state counterterrorist behavior.' <div>' '</div>http://jtr.st-andrews.ac.uk/articles/880terrorismcounterterrorismalliancescollective action |
spellingShingle | Kyle T Kattelman Operation Enduring Freedom: Institutional Constraints, Alliance Commitments, and the Power Capabilities of Counterterrorism Journal of Terrorism Research terrorism counterterrorism alliances collective action |
title | Operation Enduring Freedom: Institutional Constraints, Alliance Commitments, and the Power Capabilities of Counterterrorism |
title_full | Operation Enduring Freedom: Institutional Constraints, Alliance Commitments, and the Power Capabilities of Counterterrorism |
title_fullStr | Operation Enduring Freedom: Institutional Constraints, Alliance Commitments, and the Power Capabilities of Counterterrorism |
title_full_unstemmed | Operation Enduring Freedom: Institutional Constraints, Alliance Commitments, and the Power Capabilities of Counterterrorism |
title_short | Operation Enduring Freedom: Institutional Constraints, Alliance Commitments, and the Power Capabilities of Counterterrorism |
title_sort | operation enduring freedom institutional constraints alliance commitments and the power capabilities of counterterrorism |
topic | terrorism counterterrorism alliances collective action |
url | http://jtr.st-andrews.ac.uk/articles/880 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kyletkattelman operationenduringfreedominstitutionalconstraintsalliancecommitmentsandthepowercapabilitiesofcounterterrorism |