Towards Experiments to Test Violation of the Original Bell Inequality

The aim of this paper is to attract the attention of experimenters to the original Bell (OB) inequality that was shadowed by the common consideration of the Clauser–Horne–Shimony–Holt (CHSH) inequality. There are two reasons to test the OB inequality and not the CHSH in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrei Khrennikov, Irina Basieva
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-04-01
Series:Entropy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/20/4/280
_version_ 1798039361797750784
author Andrei Khrennikov
Irina Basieva
author_facet Andrei Khrennikov
Irina Basieva
author_sort Andrei Khrennikov
collection DOAJ
description The aim of this paper is to attract the attention of experimenters to the original Bell (OB) inequality that was shadowed by the common consideration of the Clauser–Horne–Shimony–Holt (CHSH) inequality. There are two reasons to test the OB inequality and not the CHSH inequality. First of all, the OB inequality is a straightforward consequence to the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen (EPR) argumentation. In addition, only this inequality is directly related to the EPR–Bohr debate. The second distinguishing feature of the OB inequality was emphasized by Itamar Pitowsky. He pointed out that the OB inequality provides a higher degree of violations of classicality than the CHSH inequality. For the CHSH inequality, the fraction of the quantum (Tsirelson) bound Q CHSH = 2 2 to the classical bound C CHSH = 2 , i.e., F CHSH = Q CHSH C CHSH = 2 is less than the fraction of the quantum bound for the OB inequality Q OB = 3 2 to the classical bound C OB = 1 , i.e., F OB = Q OB C OB = 3 2 . Thus, by violating the OB inequality, it is possible to approach a higher degree of deviation from classicality. The main problem is that the OB inequality is derived under the assumption of perfect (anti-) correlations. However, the last few years have been characterized by the amazing development of quantum technologies. Nowadays, there exist sources producing, with very high probability, the pairs of photons in the singlet state. Moreover, the efficiency of photon detectors was improved tremendously. In any event, one can start by proceeding with the fair sampling assumption. Another possibility is to use the scheme of the Hensen et al. experiment for entangled electrons. Here, the detection efficiency is very high.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T21:52:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0e605cc390d94071a4d9a03cd8fa1910
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1099-4300
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T21:52:50Z
publishDate 2018-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Entropy
spelling doaj.art-0e605cc390d94071a4d9a03cd8fa19102022-12-22T04:01:12ZengMDPI AGEntropy1099-43002018-04-0120428010.3390/e20040280e20040280Towards Experiments to Test Violation of the Original Bell InequalityAndrei Khrennikov0Irina Basieva1International Center for Mathematical Modeling in Physics, Engineering, Economics, and Cognitive Science, Linnaeus University, 351 95 Växjö, SwedenProkhorov General Physics Institute, Vavilov str. 38D, 119991 Moscow, RussiaThe aim of this paper is to attract the attention of experimenters to the original Bell (OB) inequality that was shadowed by the common consideration of the Clauser–Horne–Shimony–Holt (CHSH) inequality. There are two reasons to test the OB inequality and not the CHSH inequality. First of all, the OB inequality is a straightforward consequence to the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen (EPR) argumentation. In addition, only this inequality is directly related to the EPR–Bohr debate. The second distinguishing feature of the OB inequality was emphasized by Itamar Pitowsky. He pointed out that the OB inequality provides a higher degree of violations of classicality than the CHSH inequality. For the CHSH inequality, the fraction of the quantum (Tsirelson) bound Q CHSH = 2 2 to the classical bound C CHSH = 2 , i.e., F CHSH = Q CHSH C CHSH = 2 is less than the fraction of the quantum bound for the OB inequality Q OB = 3 2 to the classical bound C OB = 1 , i.e., F OB = Q OB C OB = 3 2 . Thus, by violating the OB inequality, it is possible to approach a higher degree of deviation from classicality. The main problem is that the OB inequality is derived under the assumption of perfect (anti-) correlations. However, the last few years have been characterized by the amazing development of quantum technologies. Nowadays, there exist sources producing, with very high probability, the pairs of photons in the singlet state. Moreover, the efficiency of photon detectors was improved tremendously. In any event, one can start by proceeding with the fair sampling assumption. Another possibility is to use the scheme of the Hensen et al. experiment for entangled electrons. Here, the detection efficiency is very high.http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/20/4/280original Bell inequalitypreparation of singlet statespossible experimental test
spellingShingle Andrei Khrennikov
Irina Basieva
Towards Experiments to Test Violation of the Original Bell Inequality
Entropy
original Bell inequality
preparation of singlet states
possible experimental test
title Towards Experiments to Test Violation of the Original Bell Inequality
title_full Towards Experiments to Test Violation of the Original Bell Inequality
title_fullStr Towards Experiments to Test Violation of the Original Bell Inequality
title_full_unstemmed Towards Experiments to Test Violation of the Original Bell Inequality
title_short Towards Experiments to Test Violation of the Original Bell Inequality
title_sort towards experiments to test violation of the original bell inequality
topic original Bell inequality
preparation of singlet states
possible experimental test
url http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/20/4/280
work_keys_str_mv AT andreikhrennikov towardsexperimentstotestviolationoftheoriginalbellinequality
AT irinabasieva towardsexperimentstotestviolationoftheoriginalbellinequality