Quantifying the economic effects of different fishery management regimes in two otherwise similar fisheries

In the southeast U.S., two very similar fisheries are managed by very different management regimes. In the Gulf of Mexico Reef Fish fishery, all major species are managed by individual transferable quotas (ITQs). The neighboring S. Atlantic Snapper-Grouper fishery continues to be managed by traditio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christopher Liese, Scott Crosson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2023-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10281562/?tool=EBI
_version_ 1827919203008512000
author Christopher Liese
Scott Crosson
author_facet Christopher Liese
Scott Crosson
author_sort Christopher Liese
collection DOAJ
description In the southeast U.S., two very similar fisheries are managed by very different management regimes. In the Gulf of Mexico Reef Fish fishery, all major species are managed by individual transferable quotas (ITQs). The neighboring S. Atlantic Snapper-Grouper fishery continues to be managed by traditional regulations such as vessel trip-limits and closed seasons. Using detailed landings and revenue data from logbooks together with trip-level and annual, vessel-level economic survey data, we develop financial statements for each fishery to estimate cost structures, profits, and resource rent. By comparing the two fisheries from an economic perspective, we illustrate the detrimental effects of the regulatory measures on the S. Atlantic Snapper-Grouper fishery and quantify the difference in economic outcomes, including estimating the difference in resource rent. We find that the choice of fishery management regime shows up as a regime shift in the productivity and profitability of the fisheries. The ITQ fishery generates substantially more resource rents than the traditionally managed fishery; the difference is a large fraction of revenue (~30%). In the S. Atlantic Snapper-Grouper fishery, the potential value of the resource has almost completely dissipated via lower ex-vessel prices and hundreds of thousands of gallons of wasted fuel. Excess use of labor is a lesser issue.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T03:54:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0e6684929a9645b38c4e53ee5bdd6f37
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T03:54:30Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-0e6684929a9645b38c4e53ee5bdd6f372023-06-22T05:31:38ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032023-01-01186Quantifying the economic effects of different fishery management regimes in two otherwise similar fisheriesChristopher LieseScott CrossonIn the southeast U.S., two very similar fisheries are managed by very different management regimes. In the Gulf of Mexico Reef Fish fishery, all major species are managed by individual transferable quotas (ITQs). The neighboring S. Atlantic Snapper-Grouper fishery continues to be managed by traditional regulations such as vessel trip-limits and closed seasons. Using detailed landings and revenue data from logbooks together with trip-level and annual, vessel-level economic survey data, we develop financial statements for each fishery to estimate cost structures, profits, and resource rent. By comparing the two fisheries from an economic perspective, we illustrate the detrimental effects of the regulatory measures on the S. Atlantic Snapper-Grouper fishery and quantify the difference in economic outcomes, including estimating the difference in resource rent. We find that the choice of fishery management regime shows up as a regime shift in the productivity and profitability of the fisheries. The ITQ fishery generates substantially more resource rents than the traditionally managed fishery; the difference is a large fraction of revenue (~30%). In the S. Atlantic Snapper-Grouper fishery, the potential value of the resource has almost completely dissipated via lower ex-vessel prices and hundreds of thousands of gallons of wasted fuel. Excess use of labor is a lesser issue.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10281562/?tool=EBI
spellingShingle Christopher Liese
Scott Crosson
Quantifying the economic effects of different fishery management regimes in two otherwise similar fisheries
PLoS ONE
title Quantifying the economic effects of different fishery management regimes in two otherwise similar fisheries
title_full Quantifying the economic effects of different fishery management regimes in two otherwise similar fisheries
title_fullStr Quantifying the economic effects of different fishery management regimes in two otherwise similar fisheries
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying the economic effects of different fishery management regimes in two otherwise similar fisheries
title_short Quantifying the economic effects of different fishery management regimes in two otherwise similar fisheries
title_sort quantifying the economic effects of different fishery management regimes in two otherwise similar fisheries
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10281562/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT christopherliese quantifyingtheeconomiceffectsofdifferentfisherymanagementregimesintwootherwisesimilarfisheries
AT scottcrosson quantifyingtheeconomiceffectsofdifferentfisherymanagementregimesintwootherwisesimilarfisheries