Investigating the Influence of Pore Shape on Shale Gas Recovery with CO<sub>2</sub> Injection Using Molecular Simulation

Carbon-dioxide-enhanced shale gas recovery technology has significant potential for large-scale emissions reduction and can help achieve carbon neutrality targets. Previous theoretical studies mainly focused on gas adsorption in one-dimensional pores without considering the influence from the pore g...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Juan Zhou, Shiwang Gao, Lianbo Liu, Tieya Jing, Qian Mao, Mingyu Zhu, Wentao Zhao, Bingxiao Du, Xu Zhang, Yuling Shen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-02-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/3/1529
Description
Summary:Carbon-dioxide-enhanced shale gas recovery technology has significant potential for large-scale emissions reduction and can help achieve carbon neutrality targets. Previous theoretical studies mainly focused on gas adsorption in one-dimensional pores without considering the influence from the pore geometry. This study evaluates the effects of pore shape on shale gas adsorption. The pure and competitive gas adsorption processes of CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> in nanopores were investigated using molecular simulations to improve the prediction of shale gas recovery efficiency. Meanwhile, quantitative analysis was conducted on the effects of the pore shape on the CO<sub>2</sub>-EGR efficiency. The results indicate that the density of the adsorption layer in pores is equally distributed in the axial direction when the cone angle is zero; however, when the cone angle is greater than zero, the density of the adsorption layer decreases. Smaller cone-angle pores have stronger gas adsorption affinities, making it challenging to recover the adsorbed CH<sub>4</sub> during the pressure drawdown process. Concurrently, this makes the CO<sub>2</sub> injection method, based on competitive adsorption, efficient. For pores with larger cone angles, the volume occupied by the free gas is larger; thus, the pressure drawdown method displays relatively high recovery efficiency.
ISSN:1996-1073